Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nordemann Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$89k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$184kFood & Nutrition$72kHealth$71kEducation$47kHuman Services$37kArts & Culture$35kHousing & Shelter$20kRecreation & Sports$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k25 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$2,500
Median grant
12
States reached
$539k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$12,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA$8,000
FEEDING AMERICA$8,000
Individual grant recipient$6,500
INTO THE LOOKING GLASS-MEDI-COS$5,000
FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE$5,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$3,500
ST JUDES HOSPITAL$3,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$2,700
AMERICARES$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT$2,500
HOLE IN THE WALL GANG$2,500
COUSTEAU SOCIETY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $3k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $2k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $5k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $5k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $4k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $4k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $4k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $4k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $4k → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $4k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $2k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $2k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $2k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $2k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$571k · 40 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
6

Total granted

$571k
$17k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +98%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $69k · revenue +81%
  • Feeding America
    8× · 2017–2024 · $54k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • M(
    MEDI-COS (CAREYES)-IN THE LOOKING GLASS
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • IT
    INTO THE LOOKING GLASS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
2
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
3
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
4
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
7
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
8
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
11
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
12
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Huntington Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA: $45,500 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICAIndividual grant recipient: $26,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINTO THE LOOKING GLASS-MEDI-COS: $20,000 · OtherINTO THE LOOKING GLASS-MEDI-COSIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $11,500 · OtherKNME: $8,500 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,000 · OtherWellspring Living Inc: $10,500 · Other+24 more: $82,800 · Other+24 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $69,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $69,400 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $20,500 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $13,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $9,100 · International+1 more: $2,500 · InternationalFeeding America: $54,200 · Food & NutritionFeeding Am…FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesLong Island Cares Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesChildren of the Night: $4,900 · Human ServicesWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $18,000 · EnvironmentThe Cousteau Society Inc: $12,700 · EnvironmentHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $20,300 · Housing & ShelterHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $15,500 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $3,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$236,300International$184,000Food & Nutrition$54,200Human Services$44,400Environment$30,700Housing & Shelter$20,300Recreation & Sports$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $69,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $69,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $54,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $32,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $20,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $20,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $15,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cousteau Society Inc: $12,700 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWellspring Living Inc: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $9,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $7,300 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of the Night: $4,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $4,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHUNTINGTON COMMUNITY FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSt Vincent Hospital: $2,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRASAD PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDELANCEY STREET CALIFORNIA: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds The Cousteau Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellspring Living Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND ↗
  • Who funds Children of the Night ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON COMMUNITY FIRST AID SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds St Vincent Hospital ↗
  • Who funds THE PRASAD PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC9.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nordemann Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nordemann Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nordemann’s filings →

More from the funding graph