Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Norbert H Hardner Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$320k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$357kHealth$313kHousing & Shelter$260kYouth Development$169kReligion$134kInternational$107kEnvironment$107kAnimals$80kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $203k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cathedral Preparatory School$60,000
Trout Unlimited$50,000
Homefront Inc$40,000
Communities In Schools$25,000
Hyde Square Task Force$20,000
Sisters Of Saint Joseph Of NW PA$18,000
Amazon Conservation Team$15,000
Breakthrough Austin$15,000
Erie City Mission$15,000
Georgetown Project$12,500
Partners In Sustainable Development$12,100
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Hands On Hartford$10,000
Georgetown Area Parkinsons Support$10,000
Carolyns House Hospice$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $295k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Hospice of Central Pennsylvania: $20k → 12%Homefront Inc: $45k → 9%Hands on Hartford: $10k → 11%Hospice of Central Pennsylvania: $20k → 12%Homefront Inc: $45k → 9%Hands On Hartford: $10k → 11%Hospice of Central Pennsylvania: $10k → 12%Homefront Inc: $40k → 9%Hands on Hartford: $10k → 11%Homefront Inc: $40k → 9%Hands On Hartford: $5k → 11%Homefront Inc: $40k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
NY
MA
PA
CT
MO
VA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Norbert H Hardner Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Norbert H Hardner Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 18 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$1.5M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+19%

Still filing today

72%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HOMEFRONT INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $210k · revenue +42%
  • THE HYDE SQUARE TASK FORCE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +104%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $77k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • CO
    Community of Caring Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +19%
  • MI
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Picower Institute
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • MP
    MIT Picower Institute
    one grant, 2023 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
2
Gardens for Health International

Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition

International
3
Habitat for Humanity of the Tri-State Inc

Construction/repair of homes for qualified low-income individuals and families. homes are sold based on fair market value as established by a third-party, independent appraisal with no homebuyer paying more than 30% of their monthly income…

Housing & Shelter
4
Trickle Up Program Inc

Trickle up helps people in extreme poverty and vulnerability advance their economic and social well-being. we drive large-scale change by partnering with governments, global institutions, and local organizations.

Community Improvement
5
Trenton Health Team Inc

Trenton Health Team's mission is to improve community health and well-being in the community of greater Trenton, New Jersey.

Health
6
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

7
Coming Home of Middlesex County

The mission of Coming Home is to create a system to end homelessness in Middlesex County by fostering collaborations and public-private partnerships among all stakeholders to ensure that people have a stable place to call home and…

Human Services
8
Transformca dba Transform

Transform works to ensure that people of all incomes thrive in a world safe from climate chaos.

Community Improvement
9
Home First - Interfaith Housing and Family Services

Home-first offers permanent solutions to homelessness by providing transitional housing and permanent housing, homelessness prevention assitance and support services to strengthen families and build commun

10
Partnership Housing Inc

Partnership housing, inc. brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
11
Hancock County Habitat for Humanity

Partnering with economically disadvantaged individuals and families. Hancock County Habitat For Humanity seeks to eliminate poverty housing and to make decent, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.

12
Habitat for Humanity Seattle-King County

Habitat for humanity brings people together as volunteers, homeowners, donors, and community members to create strength, stability, and self-reliance through shelter. working with volunteers, families, individuals, corporations,…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Westchester Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hospice of Central Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHEDRAL PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $210,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL PREPARATORY SCHOOLCommunities in Schools — $165,000 · OtherCommunities in SchoolsSisters of Saint Joseph of NW PA — $133,500 · OtherSisters of Saint Joseph of NW PAVilla Maria Academy — $90,000 · OtherVilla Maria AcademyIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFamilies in Transition — $50,000 · OtherFamilies in Transition+12 more — $142,400 · Other+12 moreHOMEFRONT INC — $210,000 · Human ServicesHOMEFRONT INCHOSPICE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF CENTRAL P…HANDS ON HARTFORD INC — $34,600 · Human ServicesHANDS ON HARTFORD IN…HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $60,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHT…Sea Turtle Conservancy — $60,000 · InternationalSea Turtle …PARTNERS IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL — $46,900 · InternationalPARTNERS IN…+1 more — $3,000 · InternationalThe Georgetown Project — $69,000 · HealthCommunity of Caring Inc — $35,000 · HealthTHE HYDE SQUARE TASK FORCE INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $76,600 · AnimalsBREAKTHROUGH — $55,000 · Education
Other$840,900Human Services$294,600International$169,900Health$104,000Community Improvement$100,000Animals$76,600Education$55,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOMEFRONT INC — $210,000 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetTHE HYDE SQUARE TASK FORCE INC — $100,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $76,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Georgetown Project — $69,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSea Turtle Conservancy — $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH — $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFamilies in Transition — $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL — $46,900 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetCommunity of Caring Inc — $35,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHANDS ON HARTFORD INC — $34,600 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITY MISSION OF THE EVANGELICAL CHURCHES OF ERIE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWAVE HILL INCORPORATED — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHANKAR SERVICE FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOMEFRONT INC
  • Who funds THE HYDE SQUARE TASK FORCE INC
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds The Georgetown Project
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
  • Who funds Sea Turtle Conservancy
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds Families in Transition
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds Community of Caring Inc
  • Who funds HANDS ON HARTFORD INC
  • Who funds AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM
  • Who funds CITY MISSION OF THE EVANGELICAL CHURCHES OF ERIE
  • Who funds WAVE HILL INCORPORATED
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC
  • Who funds Fueled by Kids Inc
  • Who funds SHANKAR SERVICE FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Norbert H Hardner Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 20%
  • The Hyde Square Task Force Inc52% of income from government
  • Hands On Hartford Inc20% of income from government
  • Sea Turtle Conservancy1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Norbert H Hardner Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Norbert H Hardner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph