Skip to content
Nonprofit Association of Oregon at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Nonprofit Association of Oregon

The mission of the Nonprofit Association of Oregon is to strengthen the collective voice, leadership, and capacity of nonprofits to enrich the lives of all oregonians.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Community Improvement$31kHuman Services$30kArts & Culture$10kEnvironment$10kEducation$9k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KE KUKUI FOUNDATION$10,000
ROGUE RIVER COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
SISKIYOU FIELD INSTITUTE$10,000
SOMALI OREGON SERVICE CENTER$9,900
AFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK$9,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROGUE RIVER COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 13%AFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwest Somali Community

Our mission to empower African immigrants and refugees especially those from the East African population in Oregon. Since it started the organization found ways to improve the Somali community members access to services provided to…

Education
2
Somali Cultural Center

Amplifying Somali Voices & Building Communities

Arts & Culture
3
Somali American Council of Oregon

SACOO mission is to empower the Somali community by enhancing relationships between members of the community and between the community and state wide and/or federal agencies while also promoting cultural expression and diversity. In…

International
4
Portland Esl Scholarship Fund
Philanthropy
5
Seattle Indian Center
Human Services
6
Four Rivers Welcome Center

The Welcome Center assists refugee immigrants in Malheur County to find the resources they need to build successful futures in our community.

Human Services
7
Rohingya Youth Association of Portland

To support Rohingya and Burmese immigrant and refugee families to become independent empowered and established in their new environment.

Arts & Culture
8
Wakulima Usa

Our Food Production Center will serve as our primary storage production and distribution facility. The coop will aggregate purchase store and distribute farm inputs for members and will act as an integrator collecting the output from…

Food & Nutrition
9
Somali Community Services of Seattle

Helping & supporing the somali community

Human Services
10
Southern Oregon Indian Center

To provide for the spiritual and cultural nees of First Nations People in Southern Oregon; to educate about Native culture and provide opportunities to support cultural preservation; work with children by providing field trips and camps.

Arts & Culture
11
Somali Bridge

To provide reliable and culturally appropriate news and information to the Somali Community in King County.

Human Services
12
Po Rotary Community Service Fund

Provide programs & projects to community

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Somali Oregon Service Center; the most unlike its peers is Project Ledo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH WASCO ALLIANCE: $10,900 · Community ImprovementSOUTH WASCO ALLIANCECorvallis Multicultural Literacy Center: $10,900 · Community ImprovementCorvallis Multicultural Literacy Cente…UNITED COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $8,700 · Community ImprovementUNITED COMMUNITY PARTNERS INCROGUE RIVER COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesROGUE RIVER COMMUNITY CEN…AFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK: $9,900 · Human ServicesAFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORKKE KUKUI FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsKE KUKUI FOU…SISKIYOU FIELD INSTITUTE: $10,000 · EnvironmentSISKIYOU FIE…SOMALI OREGON SERVICE CENTER: $9,900 · Civil RightsSOMALI OREGO…PROJECT LEDO: $8,900 · EducationPROJECT LED…
Community Improvement$30,500Human Services$19,900Recreation & Sports$10,000Environment$10,000Civil Rights$9,900Education$8,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTH WASCO ALLIANCE: $10,900 over 1y, 12% of budgetCorvallis Multicultural Literacy Center: $10,900 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetROGUE RIVER COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetKE KUKUI FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSISKIYOU FIELD INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSOMALI OREGON SERVICE CENTER: $9,900 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetAFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK: $9,900 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT LEDO: $8,900 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $8,700 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …The Roundhouse Founda…The Collins FoundationThe Ford Family Found…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nonprofit Association of Oregon funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nonprofit Association of Oregon. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • South Wasco Alliance: 100% of income from government
  • Corvallis Multicultural Literacy Center: 37% of income from government
  • Afghan Support Network: 29% of income from government
  • Siskiyou Field Institute: 17% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nonprofit Association of Oregon’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home