· Public charity
Nonprofit Association of Oregon
The mission of the Nonprofit Association of Oregon is to strengthen the collective voice, leadership, and capacity of nonprofits to enrich the lives of all oregonians.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROGUE RIVER COMMUNITY CENTER | $10,000 |
| KE KUKUI FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SISKIYOU FIELD INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| SOMALI OREGON SERVICE CENTER | $9,900 |
| AFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK | $9,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission to empower African immigrants and refugees especially those from the East African population in Oregon. Since it started the organization found ways to improve the Somali community members access to services provided to…
Amplifying Somali Voices & Building Communities
SACOO mission is to empower the Somali community by enhancing relationships between members of the community and between the community and state wide and/or federal agencies while also promoting cultural expression and diversity. In…
The Welcome Center assists refugee immigrants in Malheur County to find the resources they need to build successful futures in our community.
To support Rohingya and Burmese immigrant and refugee families to become independent empowered and established in their new environment.
Our Food Production Center will serve as our primary storage production and distribution facility. The coop will aggregate purchase store and distribute farm inputs for members and will act as an integrator collecting the output from…
Helping & supporing the somali community
To provide for the spiritual and cultural nees of First Nations People in Southern Oregon; to educate about Native culture and provide opportunities to support cultural preservation; work with children by providing field trips and camps.
To provide reliable and culturally appropriate news and information to the Somali Community in King County.
Provide programs & projects to community
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Somali Oregon Service Center and the most unlike its peers is Project Ledo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTH WASCO ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Corvallis Multicultural Literacy Center ↗
- Who funds KE KUKUI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SISKIYOU FIELD INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ROGUE RIVER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds AFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SOMALI OREGON SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LEDO ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nonprofit Association of Oregon funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- South Wasco Alliance — 100% of income from government
- Corvallis Multicultural Literacy Center — 37% of income from government
- Afghan Support Network — 29% of income from government
- Siskiyou Field Institute — 17% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.