Loading…
· Public charity
Nonprofit Association of Oregon
The mission of the Nonprofit Association of Oregon is to strengthen the collective voice, leadership, and capacity of nonprofits to enrich the lives of all oregonians.
$49k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
2
Communities
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2024.
Community Improvement$31kHuman Services$20kRecreation & Sports$10kEnvironment$10kCivil Rights$10kEducation$9k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2023
—
2024
education
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
- ROGUE RIVER COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
- KE KUKUI FOUNDATION$10,000
- SISKIYOU FIELD INSTITUTE$10,000
- AFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK$9,900
- SOMALI OREGON SERVICE CENTER$9,900
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Oromo Cultural Center
The primary objective of the Oromo Cultural Center is to foster education, cultural growth, social integration, and job search support for underserved communities, with a particular focus on the Oromo community residing within the Seattle…
Arts & Culture
2
Rohingya Youth Association of Portland
To support refugees to adjust to the american culture. to tore and advise its members to be good citizens.
Arts & Culture
3
Somali American Council of Oregon
To support with basics of life and protect their civil rights of the one of the poorest, linguistically challenged and underserved or in many cases not served community in Oregon. We also focus on uplifting and supporting this mostly…
International
4
Seattle Indian Center
Human Services
5
Lao Community Service Center
Lao Community Service center's mission is to united the Lao Community in the Pacific Northwest. We assist the Lao Community with social, cultural, and educational services.
Human Services
6
Oregon Karen Association
The Oregon Karen Association's mission statement is to enhance the quality of life for the Karen Community in Oregon.
Community Improvement
7
Four Rivers Welcome Center
Services to refugees and immigrants
Human Services
8
Kukatonon
To inspire confidence, commitment, and vitality amoung children, families, and communities; and to broaden awareness of african and african american cultural traditions throughout oregon.
—
9
Multicultural Association of Southern Oregon
Education, Public Benefit
Arts & Culture
10
Nw Community Center
our mission is to promote community development though multi-culture and multi lingual program. NWCC collaborates with native and multi-ethnic communties to support culturaland educational community service
Arts & Culture
11
Kiawanda Community Center
The mission of the organization is to promote community participation through intergenerational activities, programs and projects that meet the needs of the citizens of south Tillamook county.
Human Services
12
Oregon Origins Project
Oregon Origins Project's mission is to explore the ancient origins of the state of Oregon through creative expression, by presenting events which engage artists, Indigenous culture bearers, scientists, and others to share artistic,…
Arts & Culture
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Somali Oregon Service Center and the most unlike its peers is Corvallis Multicultural Lit Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Community Improvement$30,500Human Services$19,900Recreation & Sports$10,000Environment$10,000Civil Rights$9,900Education$8,900
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTH WASCO ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CORVALLIS MULTICULT LITERACY ↗
- Who funds ROGUE RIVER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds KE KUKUI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SISKIYOU FIELD INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SOMALI OREGON SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LEDO ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Oregon Community FoundationOR16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Nonprofit Association of Oregon funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
- Corvallis Multicultural Literacy Center — 48% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOUTH WASCO ALLIANCE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 473377980 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SOUTH WASCO ALLIANCE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Nonprofit Association of Oregon?
Find your warmest path to Nonprofit Association of Oregon through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines