Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nissie and Ethel Grossman Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2022
16
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$500
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

52% of Nissie and Ethel Grossman Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Combined Jewish Philanthropies Of Greater Boston Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Nissie and Ethel Grossman Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $3k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
12
’18
10
’19
12
’20
5
’21
11
’22
3
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$44kHealth$35kReligion$9kArts & Culture$4kEducation$3kHuman Services$3kInternational$1kCivil Rights$250
02FY2022 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$150
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROFEH INTERNATIONAL$500
TEMPLE AHAVAT ACHIM$450
HEBREW SENIOR LIFE$400
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES$400
NEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMY$350
LOWN RESEARCH FOUNDATION$200
YIDDISH BOOK CENTER$187
TEMPLE ISRAEL$150
TEMPLE EMANUEL OF NEWTON$100
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$100
JACK SOBLE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$100
HEBREW COLLEGE$100
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF GREATER BOYNTON BEACH$75
NATIONAL PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION$50
PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LOWN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $200 → 7%TEMPLE AHAVAT ACHIM: $536 → 10%YIDDISH BOOK CENTER: $2k → 12%JACK SOBLE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $100 → 11%LOWN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $100 → 7%TEMPLE AHAVAT ACHIM: $450 → 10%YIDDISH BOOK CENTER: $2k → 12%CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF GREATER BOYNTON BEACH: $100 → 11%LOWN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $100 → 7%YIDDISH BOOK CENTER: $600 → 12%LOWN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $100 → 7%TEMPLE EMANUEL OF NEWTON: $4k → 8%YIDDISH BOOK CENTER: $187 → 12%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $2k → 7%TEMPLE EMANUEL OF NEWTON: $300 → 8%NEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $2k → 7%TEMPLE EMANUEL OF NEWTON: $100 → 8%ST LUKE'S-SAN LUCAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $400 → 7%HEBREW COLLEGE: $100 → 8%NEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $350 → 7%TEMPLE EMANUEL OF NEWTON: $100 → 8%HEBREW SENIOR LIFE: $400 → 16%NEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $300 → 7%HEBREW COLLEGE: $100 → 8%HEBREW SENIOR LIFE: $300 → 16%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $169 → 7%TEMPLE EMANUEL OF NEWTON: $100 → 8%HEBREW SENIOR LIFE: $200 → 16%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $150 → 7%HEBREW COLLEGE: $100 → 8%HEBREW SENIOR LIFE: $200 → 16%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $100 → 7%TEMPLE EMANUEL OF NEWTON: $100 → 8%HEBREW SENIOR LIFE: $200 → 16%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $100 → 7%HEBREW SENIOR LIFE: $100 → 16%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $34k → 16%TEMPLE ISRAEL: $1k → 16%TEMPLE ISRAEL: $204 → 16%ROFEH INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 7%TEMPLE ISRAEL: $200 → 16%ROFEH INTERNATIONAL: $200 → 7%TEMPLE ISRAEL: $200 → 16%ROFEH INTERNATIONAL: $100 → 7%TEMPLE ISRAEL: $150 → 16%ROFEH INTERNATIONAL: $100 → 7%COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES: $42k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22k · 18 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$22k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+32%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue +99%
  • RI
    ROFEH INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $1k · revenue +106%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $519 · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LUKE'S-SAN LUCAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • JT
    JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2018 · $50
  • NB
    NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50 · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
3
Hebrew Seniorlife Hospice Care Inc

The mission of hsl hospice is to provide exceptional care to terminally ill patients and their families allowing patients to attain the highest quality of life possible. hsl hospice aims to provide the highest quality hospice service that…

Human Services
4
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
5
Jewish Healthcare Center Inc

The center owns and operates a 141 bed skilled nursing facility that provides inpatient long-term care and recuperative services for its patients.

Health
6
Passaic Hebrew Institute

YBH of Passaic, a K-8 yeshiva in Passaic, New Jersey, emphasizes the primacy of Torah and Yiras Shomayim and offers a serious and comprehensive General Studies curriculum. YBH stresses the importance of middos tovos and acting with…

Education
7
Hillel Foundation of Cambridge Inc
Religion
8
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
9
Jack M Barrack Hebrew Academy

Jack m. barrack hebrew academy is a pluralistic jewish day school for students in grades six through twelve from a broad variety of backgrounds. the school integrates a comprehensive and rigorous college preparatory curriculum with the…

—
10
Partners in Jewish Life Inc

Partners in Jewish Life Inc. is dedicated to inspiring a lifelong connection to Judaism through meaningful learning personal relationships and community engagement. The organization creates transformative Jewish educational experiences for…

Religion
11
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
12
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jack M Soble Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $42,164 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston …+1 more: $1,400 · PhilanthropyDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $33,500 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncTEMPLE EMANUEL OF NEWTON: $4,304 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUEL OF N…NEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $2,800 · OtherNEW ENGLAND HEBREW …JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $2,700 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHI…TEMPLE ISRAEL INCORPORATED: $1,954 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL INCOR…ST LUKE'S-SAN LUCAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1,400 · OtherST LUKE'S-SAN LUCAS…ROFEH INC: $1,000 · OtherROFEH INCTEMPLE AHAVAT ACHIM: $986 · OtherTEMPLE AHAVAT ACHIM+10 more: $2,394 · Other+10 moreNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $4,189 · Arts & CultureHEBREW COLLEGE: $441 · EducationPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $125 · EducationThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $100 · Education
Philanthropy$43,564Health$33,500Other$17,538Arts & Culture$4,189Education$666

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $42,164 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $33,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $4,189 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $2,800 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHebrew Senior Life Inc: $1,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH INC: $1,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $519 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW COLLEGE: $441 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Hebrew Senior Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds JACK M SOBLE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reuben and Lizzie Grossman Foundation IncMA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reuben and Lizzie Grossman Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nissie and Ethel Grossman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nissie and Ethel Grossman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • New England Hebrew Academy: 10% of income from government
  • Perkins School for the Blind: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Hebrew Senior Life Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nissie and Ethel Grossman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nissie and Ethel Grossman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nissie and Ethel Grossman’s filings →

More from the funding graph