Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nicholson Dimes Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Philanthropy$105kHuman Services$105kReligion$101kInternational$47kHealth$5kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $51k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSION INDIA$10,800
NEW COVENANT MISSIONS$10,560
STCH MINISTRIES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BRIDGE TO HOPE$10,000
CHILD HOPE INTERNATIONAL$6,200
TEXAS ARMS OF LOVE$5,000
HOPE FOR THE FATHERLESS$5,000
PETRA CARES$5,000
MISSION X MISSION INC$5,000
AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES$5,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$5,000
PROJECT ONE LOVE$5,000
THE BRYAN MUSEUM$5,000
FCA$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $5k → 10%PROJECT ONE LOVE: $5k → 9%THE BRYAN MUSEUM: $5k → 14%1557 MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%STCH MINISTRIES: $10k → 29%CAMPUS CRUSADE F: $23k → 13%BRIDGE TO HOPE: $10k → 15%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN: $2k → 15%AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $10k → 8%FAMILY FOUNDATION FCA: $8k → 9%EVANGELISM EXPLOSION INTERNATIONAL: $23k → 12%HOPE FOR THE FATHERLESS: $5k → 3%15 57 MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%CRU FOUNDATION: $17k → 13%AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $5k → 8%FCA: $3k → 9%EVANGELISM EXPLOSION: $10k → 12%15 57 MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE F: $13k → 13%15 57 MINISTRIES: $249 → 16%CRU FOUNDATION: $9k → 13%15 57 MINISTRIES: $40 → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $5k → 13%PETRA CARES: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MI
OR
CT
CA
CO
MO
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Nicholson Dimes Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 47% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 100%.

Nicholson Dimes Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$89k · 5 repeat orgs$279k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$89k
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+69%

Still filing today

80%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionInternationalHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 1M
    1557 MINISTRIES
    2× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +19%
  • AN
    AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +8%
  • MX
    MISSION X MISSION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • GO
    GENERATION ONE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -2%
  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE F
    one grant, 2022 · $36k
  • CF
    CRU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project New Hope International

Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…

—
2
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
3
Orphans Hope International
—
4
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
5
Prepare the Way Ministry

Education, Humanitarian, Community outreach and evangelism ministry. Provide Orphan Care, Train Youth in Career Paths, Train Pastors and Others in Bible School, Prison Ministry, Provide Elementary School for about 300 Children

International
6
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
7
Pearl Ministries Inc

Pearl Ministries partners with individuals, families, and churches to help orphans and vulnerable children in Uganda, the Pearl of Africa, through gospel centered, holistic development of family and community in partnership with indigenous…

Religion
8
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
9
Touch the World Ministries Inc

To seek to proclaim the name of Jesus Christ, to promote Christian principles and the spiritual and physical well being of the world. Major programs include: Orphan ministries, including building orphanages, feeding and educating children,…

Religion
10
Mission 10 10 Foundation

Ministry organization operating in Ethiopia. We provide foster care to kids abandoned to the street, including housing, food, clothing, education, a savings fund, spiritual nurturing. We also support families of kids in the community that…

Religion
11
Be Hope International
Religion
12
Hope Outreach International Ministries

Evangelizing the lost through gospel crusades, camps and conferences; Empowering orphans and widows and those in need through Christ-centered vocational training; and Equipping ministers of the gospel through Christian seminars and…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Hope International; the most unlike its peers is Bridge to Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMPUS CRUSADE F: $36,217 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FCRU FOUNDATION: $25,835 · OtherCRU FOUNDATIONEVANGELISM EXPLOSION III INTERNATIONAL INC: $22,500 · OtherEVANGELISM EXPLOSION III INTERNATIONAL INCMISSION INDIA: $20,800 · OtherMISSION INDIASTCH MINISTRIES: $10,000 · OtherSTCH MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAMILY FOUNDATION FCA: $7,665 · Other+6 more: $25,400 · Other+6 moreGENERATION ONE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesGENERATION ONE INCHere I Am Orphan Ministries Inc: $20,930 · Human ServicesHere I Am Orphan Ministries Inc1557 MINISTRIES: $22,290 · Religion1557 MINI…MISSION X MISSION INC: $10,000 · ReligionMISSION X…AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 · EducationPetra Cares: $5,000 · EducationNEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC: $10,560 · InternationalHOPE FOR THE FATHERLESS: $5,000 · InternationalBRIDGE TO HOPE INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyChild Hope International: $6,200 · Arts & CultureFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $5,000 · Health
Other$158,417Human Services$120,930Religion$32,290Education$20,000International$15,560Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$6,200Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGENERATION ONE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget1557 MINISTRIES: $22,290 over 2y, 15% of budgetHere I Am Orphan Ministries Inc: $20,930 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC: $10,560 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMISSION X MISSION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetChild Hope International: $6,200 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHOPE FOR THE FATHERLESS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPetra Cares: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GENERATION ONE INC ↗
  • Who funds 1557 MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Here I Am Orphan Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds NEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE TO HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION X MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Child Hope International ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR THE FATHERLESS ↗
  • Who funds Petra Cares ↗
  • Who funds FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nicholson Dimes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nicholson Dimes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nicholson Dimes Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Nicholson Dimes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nicholson Dimes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph