Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nicholas W Genematas II Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$112k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$119kHuman Services$39kHealth$25kYouth Development$22kReligion$17kEducation$16kInternational$13kHousing & Shelter$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$111,937
Median grant
1
States reached
$211k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STANLEY - DAF$111,937
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $3k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF HARRISBURG CAPITA: $4k → 8%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $2k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF HARRISBURG CAPITA: $4k → 8%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $2k → 12%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $2k → 12%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $2k → 12%CASA DE LA LUZ FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $2k → 12%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $500 → 12%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $1k → 12%EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRA: $2k → 15%ST LUKE'S IN THE DESERT INC: $2k → 15%EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRA: $2k → 15%EASTER SEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRA: $1k → 15%EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRA: $1k → 15%EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRA: $1k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $2k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $2k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$133k · 19 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
23

Total granted

$133k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+44%

Still filing today

79%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +213%
  • WM
    WORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED
    6× · 2017–2022 · $13k · revenue +9%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $11k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • RR
    Roots & Roads Community Hospice Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +116%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CHECK-UP CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2023 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
2
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
3
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
4
Phoenix Children's Hospital

To advance hope, healing and the best healthcare for children and their families.

Health
5
Tucson Medical Center

Tucson medical center's mission is to deliver caring, personalized, quality healthcare to patients and their families in an environment that is supportive, education-focused and compassionate.

Health
6
Children's Clinics for Rehabilitative Services

The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.

Health
7
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
8
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
9
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
10
Arizona Youth Partnership

Arizona youth partnership, (azyp), empowers youth to harness their strengths to live healthy and purposeful lives.

Health
11
Southern Az Childrens Advocacy Ctr Inc

The mission of the chidrens advocacy center of southern arizona is to provide a safe, compassionate, healing environment for children who have been a victim or witnessed a crime. vision: provide each child with the safety they need to tell…

Crime & Legal
12
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easterseals Blake Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cochise Canine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Social ServicesPennsylvania Advocacy Organ…Youth and Family Community …Hospital Systems and Health…Southern Arizona Community …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr18%29%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr14%11%35–55yr14%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr18%17%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr14%12%35–55yr14%42%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
15%
2,864/19,721

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
23/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY - DAF — $111,937 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY - DAFOLIVIA'S HOUSE GRIEF LOSS CENTER — $16,000 · OtherOLIVIA'S HOUSE GRIEF LOSS CENTERBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AZ — $9,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AZ+19 more — $38,000 · Other+19 moreBETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC — $13,500 · Human ServicesBETHESDA MISSION OF …CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC — $10,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHAMPIONS…FAMILY PROMISE OF HARRISBURG CAPITAL REGION — $8,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF HA…EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRAM — $7,000 · Human ServicesEASTSIDE NEIGHBORS V…YOUTH ON THEIR OWN — $4,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWNYWCA GREATER HARRISBURG — $2,500 · Human ServicesRoots & Roads Community Hospice Foundation — $2,500 · Human Services+2 more — $3,000 · Human Services+2 moreIntegrative Touch — $8,500 · HealthVICKIE'S ANGEL WALK INC — $2,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $2,000 · HealthCARE FUND — $1,500 · HealthCommunity Check Up Center of S — $1,500 · HealthLITERACY CONNECTS — $7,000 · EducationIMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL — $6,500 · EducationMake Way For Books — $2,000 · EducationWORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED — $13,000 · InternationalTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc — $7,500 · Recreation & SportsHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON — $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$175,437Human Services$51,500Health$15,500Education$15,500International$13,000Recreation & Sports$7,500Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC — $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED — $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC — $10,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetIntegrative Touch — $8,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF HARRISBURG CAPITAL REGION — $8,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc — $7,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS — $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetIMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL — $6,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN — $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS — $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEYTON WALKER FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYWCA GREATER HARRISBURG — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRoots & Roads Community Hospice Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMake Way For Books — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA DENTAL FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetVICKIE'S ANGEL WALK INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSt Lukes in the Desert Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBoys to Men Tucson Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARE FUND — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDARDS HOUSE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCommunity Check Up Center of S — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Hs Lopez Family F…Arizona Community Fou…Connie Hillman Family…The Foundation for En…Elizabeth Read Taylor…The Carl & Mabel Shur…United Way of Tucson …United Way of the Cap…Tucson Osteopathic Me…Fred & Christine Arms…Kautz Family Foundati…
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ31.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Elizabeth Read Taylor Foundation · The Carl & Mabel Shurtz Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · United Way of the Capital Region · Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Kautz Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nicholas W Genematas II Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines