Skip to content
Nicholas W Genematas II Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Nicholas W Genematas II Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$112k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$119kHuman Services$39kHealth$25kYouth Development$22kReligion$17kEducation$16kInternational$13kHousing & Shelter$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$111,937
Median grant
1
States reached
$211k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STANLEY - DAF$111,937
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $3k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF HARRISBURG CAPITA: $4k → 8%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $2k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF HARRISBURG CAPITA: $4k → 8%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $2k → 12%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $2k → 12%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $2k → 12%CASA DE LA LUZ FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $2k → 12%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $500 → 12%CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA: $1k → 12%ST LUKE'S IN THE DESERT INC: $2k → 15%EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRA: $2k → 15%EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRA: $2k → 15%EASTER SEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRA: $1k → 15%EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRA: $1k → 15%EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRA: $1k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $2k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $2k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$133k · 19 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
23

Total granted

$133k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+44%

Still filing today

79%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +213%
  • WM
    WORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED
    6× · 2017–2022 · $13k · revenue +9%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $11k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CHECK-UP CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • RR
    Roots & Roads Community Hospice Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +116%
  • TC
    TUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
2
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
3
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
4
Phoenix Children's Hospital

To advance hope, healing and the best healthcare for children and their families.

Health
5
Tucson Medical Center

Tucson medical center's mission is to deliver caring, personalized, quality healthcare to patients and their families in an environment that is supportive, education-focused and compassionate.

Health
6
Children's Clinics for Rehabilitative Services

The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.

Health
7
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
8
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
9
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
10
Arizona Youth Partnership

Arizona youth partnership, (azyp), empowers youth to harness their strengths to live healthy and purposeful lives.

Health
11
Southern Az Childrens Advocacy Ctr Inc

The mission of the chidrens advocacy center of southern arizona is to provide a safe, compassionate, healing environment for children who have been a victim or witnessed a crime. vision: provide each child with the safety they need to tell…

Crime & Legal
12
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easterseals Blake Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Cochise Canine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
23/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY - DAF: $111,937 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY - DAFOLIVIA'S HOUSE GRIEF LOSS CENTER: $16,000 · OtherOLIVIA'S HOUSE GRIEF LOSS CENTERBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AZ: $9,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AZ+19 more: $38,000 · Other+19 moreBETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC: $13,500 · Human ServicesBETHESDA MISSION OF …CENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHAMPIONS…FAMILY PROMISE OF HARRISBURG CAPITAL REGION: $8,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF HA…EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRAM: $7,000 · Human ServicesEASTSIDE NEIGHBORS V…YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $4,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWNRoots & Roads Community Hospice Foundation: $2,500 · Human ServicesYWCA GREATER HARRISBURG: $2,500 · Human Services+2 more: $3,000 · Human Services+2 moreIntegrative Touch: $8,500 · HealthVICKIE'S ANGEL WALK INC: $2,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $2,000 · HealthCommunity Check Up Center of S: $1,500 · HealthCARE FUND: $1,500 · HealthLITERACY CONNECTS: $7,000 · EducationIMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL: $6,500 · EducationMake Way For Books: $2,000 · EducationWORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED: $13,000 · InternationalTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$175,437Human Services$51,500Health$15,500Education$15,500International$13,000Recreation & Sports$7,500Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBETHESDA MISSION OF HARRISBURG INC: $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CHAMPIONS OF PA INC: $10,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetIntegrative Touch: $8,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF HARRISBURG CAPITAL REGION: $8,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc: $7,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetIMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL: $6,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPEYTON WALKER FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRoots & Roads Community Hospice Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetYWCA GREATER HARRISBURG: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVICKIE'S ANGEL WALK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARIZONA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMake Way For Books: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Lukes in the Desert Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Check Up Center of S: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDARDS HOUSE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys to Men Tucson Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCARE FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Hs Lopez Family F…Arizona Community Fou…Connie Hillman Family…The Foundation for En…Elizabeth Read Taylor…The Carl & Mabel Shur…United Way of Tucson …United Way of the Cap…Tucson Osteopathic Me…Fred & Christine Arms…Kautz Family Foundati…
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ31.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Elizabeth Read Taylor Foundation · The Carl & Mabel Shurtz Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · United Way of the Capital Region · Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Kautz Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nicholas W Genematas II Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nicholas W Genematas II Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nicholas W Genematas II’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home