Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nicholas Angelo Petrucci Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$340k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of NICHOLAS ANGELO PETRUCCI CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $275k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTMORELAND FOOD BANK$65,000
VETERANS LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC$25,000
NORWIN AREA MEALS ON WHEELS$25,000
ROSEDALE CIVIC ASSOCIATION$25,000
PRESENTATION OF CHRIST CHURCH$25,000
UNION MISSION OF LATROBE INC$25,000
CASA OF WESTMORELAND INC$25,000
LIGHTS OF LIFE MINISTIES INC$25,000
CENTRAL WESTMORELAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC$25,000
CALVARY CHURCH$25,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE LAUREL REGION$25,000
PREGNANCY CARE CENTERS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIGHTS OF LIFE MINISTIES INC: $25k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $25k → 11%LIGHTS OF LIFE MINISTIES INC: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$690k · 10 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$690k
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+23%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Food & NutritionEducationCrime & LegalHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CASA OF WESTMORELAND INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue +1%
  • VL
    VETERANS LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +4%
  • NA
    Norwin Area Meals on Wheels
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • WP
    WILLIAM PENN VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSOCIATION OF PENN TOWNSHIP
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -10% · 25% of their budget
  • WC
    WESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +23%
  • CJ
    CR JRS CHIP
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Meals On Wheels of Northeastern Pa Inc

Provides nourishing, well-balanced meals to homebound, elderly, and/or disabled persons throughout lackawanna county to improve the health and quality of life of the local community.

2
Life'swork of Western Pennsylvania

We partner with people with disabilities, people with other barriers, young adults, children, and families to pursue their hopes and dreams through strengthening workplace abilities, building life skills, and developing meaningful…

3
Meals On Wheels of Chester County

To provide nutritious meals and personal interaction to homebound adults living in chester county to help them live independently in their own homes.

Human Services
4
Mckeesport Meals on Wheels Inc

McKeesport Area Meals on Wheels provides meals to numerous McKeesport Area elderly anddisabled individuals throughtout the calender year.

Food & Nutrition
5
Westminster Rescue Mission

The westminster rescue mission is a community that provides clinical, physical, and spiritual resources to heal the addicted and feed the hungry. we take a holistic approach with christ as the foundation of our work.

Housing & Shelter
6
Meals On Wheels Inc

Meals on wheels of greater lynchburg addresses the hunger, isolation, and unique needs of the homebound. driven by volunteers who embody compassionate care, meals on wheels strengthens our community by delivering hot, nutritious meals,…

7
Hope Rescue Mission of the City of Reading

The organization offers food, clothing and shelter to the unhomed of berks county. services offered include education and work development, providing spiritual transformation through discipleship, church attendence, bibel study and prayer…

8
Westminster Homes of the Lehigh Valley

Our mission is to provide clean safe & affordable sober living housing to individuals to experience living in a structured peer supported environment enhancing their ability to be part of a recovery program and experience the benefits of a…

Housing & Shelter
9
Western Fairfax Christian Ministries

To provide food and financial support for persons at risk of hunger and homelessness living in western Fairfax County Virginia.

Human Services
10
West Chester Food Cupboard

The west chester food cupboard is one of the largest hunger relief agencies in chester county. we are the primary source of food assistance for low- income residents living in and around the west chester area school district. west chester…

Food & Nutrition
11
Whole Life Services Inc

Whole life services, inc.'s daily operations are motivated by and driven by persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (id/dd), their families, and others in the community supporting their lives. in order to empower people to…

Human Services
12
Meals On Wheels of Salem County Inc

The mission of Meals on Wheels of Salem County (MOW) is to provide hot nutritious meals to disabled and persons who are over the age of 60 and unable to provide for themselves, prepare their own meals and make daily purchases of foods and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Light of Life Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Care Centers Dba Network of Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTMORELAND FOOD BANK — $130,000 · OtherWESTMORELAND FOOD BANKCALVARY CHURCH — $105,000 · OtherCALVARY CHURCHROSEDALE CIVIC ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · OtherROSEDALE CIVIC ASSOCIATIONVETERANS LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC — $50,000 · OtherVETERANS LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INCUNION MISSION OF LATROBE INC — $50,000 · OtherUNION MISSION OF LATROBE INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE LAUREL REGION — $50,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE LAUREL REGIONCentral Westmoreland Habitat for Humanity Inc — $50,000 · OtherCentral Westmoreland Habitat for Humanity IncPRESENTATION OF CHRIST CHURCH — $25,000 · OtherNorwin Area Meals on Wheels — $50,000 · Food & NutritionNorwin Area M…WESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 · Food & NutritionWESTMORELAND …CASA OF WESTMORELAND INC — $80,000 · Crime & LegalCASA OF WE…LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF …WILLIAM PENN VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSOCIATION OF PENN TOWNSHIP — $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPREGNANCY CARE CENTERS DBA NETWORK OF LIFE — $25,000 · HealthCR JRS CHIP — $15,000 · Education
Other$510,000Food & Nutrition$100,000Crime & Legal$80,000Human Services$75,000Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Health$25,000Education$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCASA OF WESTMORELAND INC — $80,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWILLIAM PENN VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSOCIATION OF PENN TOWNSHIP — $50,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetVETERANS LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNION MISSION OF LATROBE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNorwin Area Meals on Wheels — $50,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE LAUREL REGION — $50,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetCentral Westmoreland Habitat for Humanity Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTERS DBA NETWORK OF LIFE — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCR JRS CHIP — $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of Southwestern PennsylvaniaPA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nicholas Angelo Petrucci Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph