Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nicholas And Anita Mercede Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$111kPhilanthropy$64kInternational$35kArts & Culture$32kEnvironment$15kRecreation & Sports$11kHuman Services$7kEmployment$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$95k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ireland Fund-Celtic Fndtn$12,000
Abilis$5,000
Westport Library$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SILVERSOURCE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$229k · 9 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
15

Total granted

$229k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
+46%

Still filing today

56%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEmploymentEnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE IRELAND FUND-CELTIC FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $64k
  • SH
    STAMFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $50k
  • IF
    Ireland Fund-Celtic Fndtn
    2× · 2023–2024 · $32k

Funded once

  • MR
    MILL RIVER COLLABORATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +68%
  • HF
    HILARITY FOR CHARITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +120%
  • SW
    SAFE WATER NETWORK
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
4
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

5
Northwell Inc

Northwell, inc. is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, scientific and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. northwell, inc. is organized and operated exclusively for the…

Health
6
Lungevity Foundation Inc

Lungevity's vision is a world where no one dies of lung cancer. lungevity foundation is firmly committed to making an immediate impact on increasing quality-of-life and survivorship of people with lung cancer by accelerating research into…

Health
7
Western Connecticut Health Network Affiliates Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

8
West Colebrook Farm Company
Arts & Culture
9
Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc

To raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distributions to danbury and new milford hospitals and other not-for profit health care affiliates.

Health
10
Dana-Farber Inc

The purpose and activities of dana-farber, inc. are to promote and support the exempt missions of dana-farber cancer institute and to provide investment management services.

Unclassified
11
Northwell Health Foundation

Northwell health foundation inc. is dedicated toward helping donors, patients, and leaders link their vision and philanthropic support toward helping the underserved and uninsured, advancing the latest frontiers in medical technology and…

Health
12
Western Connecticut Health Network Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mill River Collaborative Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Silversource Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE IRELAND FUND-CELTIC FOUNDATION — $63,751 · OtherTHE IRELAND FUND-CELTIC FOUNDATIONSTAMFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherSTAMFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONIreland Fund-Celtic Fndtn — $32,000 · OtherIreland Fund-Celtic FndtnIndividual grant recipient — $11,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAFE WATER NETWORK — $10,000 · OtherSAFE WATER NETWORK+9 more — $13,300 · Other+9 moreNorwalk Hospital Foundation — $20,000 · HealthNorwalk Hospital Founda…SERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK — $12,500 · HealthSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S N…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY…HILARITY FOR CHARITY INC — $10,000 · HealthHILARITY FOR CHARITY IN…ABILIS INC — $5,000 · HealthABILIS INCRon Foley Foundation Inc — $2,500 · HealthFAIRFIELD THEATRE COMPANY INC — $23,500 · Arts & CultureFAIRFIELD T…Stamford Museum & Nature Center Inc — $5,000 · Arts & CultureStamford Mu…MILL RIVER COLLABORATIVE INC — $11,000 · Recreation & SportsTEAM WOOFGANG & CO INC — $6,000 · EmploymentGREEN MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY INCORPORATED — $5,000 · EnvironmentAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · International
Other$180,551Health$60,000Arts & Culture$28,500Recreation & Sports$11,000Employment$6,000Environment$5,000International$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAIRFIELD THEATRE COMPANY INC — $23,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNorwalk Hospital Foundation — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK — $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMILL RIVER COLLABORATIVE INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILARITY FOR CHARITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTEAM WOOFGANG & CO INC — $6,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetStamford Museum & Nature Center Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABILIS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIBECA FILM INSTITUTE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRon Foley Foundation Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF SILVERSOURCE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARHILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Rich Foundation Inc · Stamford Rotary Trust Fund · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nicholas And Anita Mercede Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 17%
  • Mill River Collaborative Inc100% of income from government
  • Abilis Inc74% of income from government
  • Green Mountain Conservancy Incorporated49% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc17% of income from government
  • Stamford Museum & Nature Center Inc9% of income from government
  • Fairfield Theatre Company Inc0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nicholas And Anita Mercede Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Nicholas And Anita Mercede Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph