Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nia Fund Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$500
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Civil Rights$61kHousing & Shelter$38kEducation$17kEnvironment$17kArts & Culture$13kPhilanthropy$5kPublic Benefit$5kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NIA IMANI FAMILY INC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NIA IMANI FAMILY INC: $21k → 17%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%NIA IMANI FAMILY INC: $17k → 17%NIA IMANI FAMILY INC: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$108k · 3 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +255% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
25

Total granted

$108k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+255%
+35%

Still filing today

67%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Crime & LegalEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE PEOPLE CORPORATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $60k
  • NIA IMANI FAMILY INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $38k · revenue +255%
  • ID
    Infact DBA Corporate Accountability
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • MILWAUKEE FILM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue -33%
  • MC
    MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WI
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
2
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

3
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
4
Milwaukee Water Commons Inc

Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…

Environment
5
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
6
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
7
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
8
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

9
Legal Action of Wisconsin Inc

Legal action exists to provide creative, effective, and high-quality legal representation in order to achieve justice for low-income people and others to whom it would otherwise be denied. we advocate for empowerment and systemic change to…

Crime & Legal
10
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midwest Environmental Advocates Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr16%23%35–55yr19%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr16%53%20–35yr16%16%35–55yr19%9%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
8%
3,022/36,502

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE PEOPLE CORPORATION — $60,000 · OtherPEOPLE FOR PEOPLE PEOPLE CORPORATIONMEDICAL COLLEGE OF WI — $11,000 · OtherMEDICAL COLLEGE OF WIROTARY CLUB OF MILWAUKEE — $5,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF MILWAUKEECOMMUNITY ADVOCATES INC — $3,000 · Other+9 more — $3,400 · OtherNIA IMANI FAMILY INC — $38,000 · Human ServicesNIA IMANI FAMILY INC+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesInfact DBA Corporate Accountability — $10,000 · EnvironmentInfact DBA…URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentURBAN ECOL…+1 more — $250 · EnvironmentMILWAUKEE FILM INC — $12,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $250 · Arts & CultureALVERNO COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC — $250 · EducationRCM COMMUNITY FUND — $5,000 · PhilanthropyWISCONSIN JUSTICE INITIATIVE INC — $1,500 · Crime & LegalMIDWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES INC — $1,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $338 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE INC — $150 · Crime & Legal
Other$82,400Human Services$38,100Environment$15,250Arts & Culture$12,250Education$6,250Philanthropy$5,000Crime & Legal$2,988

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNIA IMANI FAMILY INC — $38,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetMILWAUKEE FILM INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInfact DBA Corporate Accountability — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF MILWAUKEE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALVERNO COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRCM COMMUNITY FUND — $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ADVOCATES INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN JUSTICE INITIATIVE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTECHNOSERVE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC MILWAUKEE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $338 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIANO ARTS OF WISCONSIN INC — $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRainforest Action Network — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nia Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nia Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Nia Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph