Skip to content
Next Chapter a de Lisi Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Next Chapter a de Lisi Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$190kEnvironment$165kArts & Culture$78kHuman Services$40kHealth$29kRecreation & Sports$29kInternational$5k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$25,000
DUCHESNE ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART$25,000
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$25,000
DUCHESNE ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART$25,000
CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC$10,000
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FUND$5,000
ACHIEVEMENT FIRST BRIDGEPORT ACADEMY INC$5,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$5,000
GUADALUPE CENTER INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HORSEMENS DISTRESS FUND INC: $10k → 9%HORSEMENS DISTRESS FUND INC: $5k → 9%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $5k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $5k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Next Chapter a de Lisi Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Next Chapter a de Lisi Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$404k · 10 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$404k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+16%

Still filing today

90%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $145k · revenue +226%
  • TC
    THE CONNECTICUT RIVER FOUNDATION AT STEAMBOAT DOCK INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +16%
  • AF
    ACHIEVEMENT FIRST BRIDGEPORT ACADEMY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • TE
    THE EQUUS EFFECT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +16%
  • THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +201%
  • AI
    ALIGHT INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…

Animals
2
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
3
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

—
4
Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Inc

Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…

Environment
5
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
6
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
7
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
11
Us Navy Memorial Foundation

The navy memorial mission is to honor, recognize and celebrate the men and women of the sea services and the important contributions made by them while serving in the united states navy, marine corps, coast guard and merchant marine. the…

Arts & Culture
12
Connectocean Conservation and Outreach Inc

Connectocean conservation and outreach is dedicated to fostering ocean stewardship and conserving aquatic ecosystems through community engagement, education, and collaborative conservation efforts. our mission is to connect communities to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $145,000 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INCCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INCTexas A&M Foundation: $50,000 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationACHIEVEMENT FIRST BRIDGEPORT ACADEMY INC: $45,000 · EducationACHIEVEMENT FIRST BRIDGEPORT …Special Operations Fund: $40,000 · EducationSpecial Operations FundSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationDUCHESNE ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART: $50,000 · OtherDUCHESNE ACADEMY OF …NAPLES EQUESTRIAN CHALLENGE INC: $29,000 · OtherNAPLES EQUESTRIAN CH…HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $9,000 · OtherHIGH HOPES THERAPEUT…THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $2,500 · OtherTHE CONNECTICUT RIVER FOUNDATION AT STEAMBOAT DOCK INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CONNECTICUT …+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureGuadalupe Center Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE HORSEMEN'S DISTRESS FUND INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE EQUUS EFFECT INC: $12,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,500 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · Religion
Environment$160,000Education$140,000Other$95,500Arts & Culture$77,500Human Services$40,000Health$17,500Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $145,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT RIVER FOUNDATION AT STEAMBOAT DOCK INC: $75,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVEMENT FIRST BRIDGEPORT ACADEMY INC: $45,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Operations Fund: $40,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HORSEMEN'S DISTRESS FUND INC: $15,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE EQUUS EFFECT INC: $12,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetARTSCONNECTION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Next Chapter a de Lisi Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Next Chapter a de Lisi Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Equus Effect Inc: 16% of income from government
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Next Chapter a de Lisi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home