· Private foundation
Newell B Sargent Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $6k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCHWAB CHARITABLE TRUST | $500,000 |
| GOTTSCHE REHABILIATION AND WELLNESS CENTER | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.
3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- SCSCHWAB CHARITABLE TRUST9× · 2017–2025 · $5.5M
- WSWYOMING STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +73%
- ALAMERICAN LEGION POST #322× · 2017–2018 · $10k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $31k
- WHWYOMING HEALTH BUSINESS COALITIONone grant, 2017 · $30k
- SHSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENone grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
None
To insure that wyoming's past remains accessible to present and future generations and to educate, support and foster the study of wyoming history.
Crisis mission: to provide temporary care and shelter for abused, abandoned or neglected children long term mission: to provide a residency program for children without a stable home.
To companion the end of life journey with skill and compassion.
The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.
Provide shelter, food, medical care and adoption services to abused, neglected, homeless and abandoned animals.
To collect, preserve, and tell the stories of the people and places of the yellowstone river valley and northern high plains region by implementing comprehensive arts and humanities projects, programs and exhibits based on broad regional…
Promoting mental wellness and providing essential mental health services in teton county regardless of a persons ability to pay.
Dedicated to serving the health, wellness, recreational, and social needs of cheyenne county and surrounding area
Yellowstone valley animal shelter is dedicated to strengthening the human-animal bond by providing compassionate and high-quality care, education, and resources to the community.
The mission of the western montana mental health center is to assist individuals and communities with the challenges of mental health, substance use, and co-occurring disorders in order to achieve their highest quality of life in a…
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Worland Youth Learning Center ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WYOMING STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NICOLAYSEN ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds RAINHORSE EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MONTANA RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CRISIS PREVENTION & RESPONSE CENTER ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Newell B Sargent Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Newell B Sargent Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Newell B Sargent Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Newell B Sargent Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Newell B Sargent’s filings →