· Private foundation
Cecil Mauger Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION | $32,245 |
| LICKING COUNTY COALITION OF CARE | $15,000 |
| HARTFORD LIBRARY ASSOC | $10,000 |
| TOGETHER WE GROW INC | $7,500 |
| LICKING COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO | $5,000 |
| JOHN & CHRISTINE WARNER FD FOR | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NDNEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS4× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +755%
- SVST VINCENT DE PAUL HOUSING FACILITIES INC3× · 2018–2024 · $25k · revenue +255%
- TWTOGETHER WE GROW INC4× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +109%
Funded once
- OHOLD HOME STRETCH MATING FUNDone grant, 2024 · $25k
- GCGRANVILLE CHRISTIAN ACADEMYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +80%
- NRNEWARK ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -88%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through partnership, guiding those in need to sustainable housing.
Improving people's lives in licking county, ohio by raising, prioritizing, awarding and monitoring funds allocated to programs that demonstrate success in the areas of education, income, health, and basic needs.
To lessen the burdens of county government and to alleviate poverty in the local area by decreasing unemployment and increasing economic opportunities for the residents of licking county.
The licking county chamber of commerce is a business organization that supports our member businesses and advances the economic well being of the licking county community.
To improve the quality of life for licking county seniors by contributing to their independence and healthy lifestyles.
Promote higher business standards in realtors of licking county
The mission of licking county foundation is to improve the quality of life for all citizens of licking county and to distribute earnings from permanent charitable assets to benefit the entire community.
See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…
The mission of licking county foundation is to improve the quality of life for all citizens of licking county and to distribute earnings from permanent charitable assets to benefit the entire community.
The mission of the licking land trust is the preservation and permanent protection of central ohio green spaces, wetlands, woods, farmlands, riparian corridors, and scenic vistas, and education about the importance of green spaces and…
To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…
The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Licking County Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is St Vincent De Paul Housing Facilities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL HOUSING FACILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE GROW INC ↗
- Who funds GRANVILLE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds NEWARK ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC ↗
- Who funds LICKING CO COALITION OF CARE ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds NORTHRIDGE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS OF LICKING COUNTY OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds Licking County Family YMCA ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LICKING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CAMP O BANNON OF LICKING COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
- Who funds LICKING COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NEWARK CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
- Who funds THE DAWES ARBORETUM ↗
- Who funds LICKING COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Licking County Foundation Inc · First Federal Foundation · The John and Mary Alford Foundation · Park National Corporation Foundation · The Lindorf Family Foundation · The Englefield Foundation · Licking Memorial Health Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Energy Cooperative Roundup Foundation Inc · The Lefevre Foundation · The Patricia R and Herbert J Murphy Foundation · The O'Neill Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cecil Mauger Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cecil Mauger Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Cecil Mauger Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.