Skip to content
New2You A Green Store at a glance

· Public charity

New2You A Green Store

Operate Thrift Store that provides customers with exceptional service and job opportunities for the community.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$168kHealth$80kFood & Nutrition$35kHuman Services$15kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $28,059, the rows itemized in this filing. The $44,834 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,775 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$161k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Williamsburg Christian Academy$13,000
FISH Inc$10,000
Care Net Peninsula$5,059
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Lackey Clinic: $5k → 5%FISH Inc: $10k → 7%Lackey Clinic: $5k → 5%FISH Inc: $10k → 7%FISH Inc: $10k → 7%FISH Inc: $10k → 7%Williamsburg House of Mercy: $5k → 7%Williamsburg House of Mercy: $5k → 7%Community of Faith Mission: $5k → 7%Community of Faith Mission: $5k → 7%The ARC of Greater Williamsburg: $5k → 7%Hospice House of Williamsburg: $5k → 7%The ARC of Greater Williamsburg: $5k → 7%The ARC of Greater Williamsburg: $5k → 7%Hospice House of Williamsburg: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$303k · 8 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$303k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    CARE NET RESOURCE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +80%
  • FI
    FISH INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +556%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF GREATER WILLIAMSBURG
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +472%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VIRGINIA PENINSULA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -17%
  • WA
    WMBG AREA MEDICAL ASSISTANCE CORP
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Williamsburg Community Health Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Peninsula Institute for Community Health

Providing medical and dental care to indigent patients.

Health
3
Williamsburg Area Faith in Action I

Williamsburg area faith in action provides non-medical support services to the eldferly, chronically ill, and disabled. the services performed include transportation, visits to homes, assistance with light house/yard work, shopping…

Human Services
4
Williamson Health and Wellness Center Inc

Williamson health and wellness center, inc. (the center) is a nonstock, nonprofit organization providing a community health center and public health/community care to clients in southern west virginia, primarily in mingo county. the…

Health
5
Williamsburg Community Child Care Center

To provide high quality learning experiences for children ages six weeks to sixth grade. This will allow us to strengthen the connection between home and our center to provide the best environment for each child.

Human Services
6
Hospice Care Corporation D/B/a West Virginia Caring

To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.

—
7
Help and Outreach Point of Entry Inc

Hope, inc. assists those in need obtain healthcare, social, and basic living services. this is accomplished through outreach to the homeless, assessments of needs and eligibility, guidance and education, assistance with obtaining…

Human Services
8
Hospice House of Hampton Roads Inc

The mission of the hospice house of hampton roads is to provide the highest quality hospice care in an environment that reflects compassion, dignity, and respect for patients and their caregivers, ensuring that no one in our community…

Human Services
9
Outer Cape Health Services Inc

Outer cape health services, inc.'s mission is to provide a full range of healthcare and supportive social services that promote the health and well-being of all who live in or visit the ten outermost towns of cape cod.

Health
10
Williamsburg Regional Hospital

Williamsburg regional hospital is a not for profit acute care hospital with 25 licensed beds, providing excellence in patient care in an environment that is respectful of others, adaptive to change, accountable for outcomes, and attentive…

Health
11
Pregnancy Help Center of Williamson County Dba Wilco Womens Center

The mission of WilCo Womens Center (WWC) is to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ by compassionately meeting the spiritual, emotional, and physical needs of women, men, and their unborn children. We affirm the sanctity of all human life by…

Human Services
12
Hospice of Central Pennsylvania

Our vision is a community that embraces specialized care at the end of life with the same importance that is given at the beginning of life. our guiding principles are service - to make a difference in the lives of our patients/families,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Williamsburg House of Mercy; the most unlike its peers is Care Net Resource Pregnancy Centers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILLIAMSBURG CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $167,628 · EducationWILLIAMSBURG CHRISTIAN ACADEMYFISH INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesFISH INCTHE ARC OF GREATER WILLIAMSBURG: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF GREATER WILLIAMSBURGWILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY: $10,000 · Human ServicesWILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCYHOSPICE HOUSE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE HOUSE INCOLIVET MEDICAL MINISTRY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesOLIVET MEDICAL MINISTRY INCCommunity of Faith Mission: $10,000 · Human ServicesCommunity of Faith MissionCARE NET RESOURCE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC: $40,458 · HealthCARE NET RESOU…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VIRGINIA PENINSULA INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentWMBG AREA MEDICAL ASSISTANCE CORP: $5,000 · Other
Education$167,628Human Services$95,000Health$40,458Youth Development$10,000Other$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILLIAMSBURG CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $167,628 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetCARE NET RESOURCE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC: $40,458 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetFISH INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTHE ARC OF GREATER WILLIAMSBURG: $25,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetWILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPICE HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VIRGINIA PENINSULA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOLIVET MEDICAL MINISTRY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity of Faith Mission: $10,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetWMBG AREA MEDICAL ASSISTANCE CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Langley for Families …United Way of the Vir…Williamsburg Communit…Greater Williamsburg …Peninsula Community F…Sentara HealthDominion Energy Chari…The Kp and Phoebe Tso…Raymond James Charita…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…
Langley for Families - the Foundation of LfcuVA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Langley for Families - the Foundation of Lfcu · United Way of the Virginia Peninsula · Williamsburg Community Health Foundation · Greater Williamsburg Community Trust · Peninsula Community Foundation of Virginia Inc · Sentara Health · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Kp and Phoebe Tsolainos Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New2You A Green Store funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New2You A Green Store. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New2You A Green Store?

    Find your warmest path to New2You A Green Store through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New2You A Green Store’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home