· Public charity
New Yorkers for Children Inc
New yorkers for children (nyfc) improves the well-being of youth and families in the child welfare system with an emphasis on older youth aging out of the system.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $2,070,447 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,540,963 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $470,516 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+1 grant · $432k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PUBLIC POLICY LAB | $431,715 |
| NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN | $202,751 |
| URBAN INSTITUTE | $193,953 |
| MERCYFIRST | $178,722 |
| NEW YORK COUNCIL ON ADOPTABLE CHILDREN | $117,297 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $111,485 |
| NOT ON MY WATCH INC | $100,000 |
| FOSTER CARE UNPLUGGED FCUP INC | $96,821 |
| CORA GROUP INC | $91,136 |
| INSTITUTE FOR A RESTORATIVE FUTURE LLC | $90,967 |
| THE ALEX HOUSE PROJECT INC | $75,000 |
| DAY ONE NEW YORK INC | $75,000 |
| NEW TOMORROW PARTNERS LLC (COMMUNITY IMPACT ADVISORS) | $75,000 |
| ADOPTIVE AND FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NY | $75,000 |
| JEREMIAH PROGRAM | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $5.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY5× · 2018–2022 · $1.4M · revenue +70%
- NYNEW YORK FOUNDLING4× · 2019–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +63%
NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC4× · 2021–2024 · $600k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- TMTHE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITYone grant, 2019 · $90k · revenue -89%
- FFFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INCone grant, 2021 · $80k · revenue -47%
- AIACKERMAN INSTITUTE FOR THE FAMILYone grant, 2021 · $68k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.
Forestdale's mission is to ensure that children have the assets they need to thrive.
Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.
We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.
Little flower is committed to improving the well-being of the children, families, and individuals with developmental disabilities across nyc and long island so they can reach their full potential. little flower transforms caring into…
Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…
The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.
The organization is dedicated to combining education and advocacy to expand opportunities for children and families in order to strengthen the voice of the latino community based on the belief that the most effective way to support latino…
To foster the healthy development of children and families and seek to empower them to respond constructively to negative societal factors including racism and its related consequences. through comprehensive, high quality mental health and…
Provide social, legal & behavioral health services to individuals and families affected by life-altering events.
Cfr's mission is to defend the rights of parents and youth through free, holistic interdisciplinary legal and social work representation.
Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundling and the most unlike its peers is Achillea Peer Tutoring Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING ↗
- Who funds NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds MERCYFIRST ↗
- Who funds SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC POLICY LAB INC ↗
- Who funds GRAHAM WINDHAM ↗
- Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK COUNCIL ON ADOPTABLE CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds FCUP Inc ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NOT ON MY WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds ADOPTIVE & FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds Alex House Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Day One of New York Inc ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds RISING GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds COMMONPOINT NY INC ↗
- Who funds AT THE TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN OF BELLEVUE INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY ↗
- Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds ACKERMAN INSTITUTE FOR THE FAMILY ↗
- Who funds SINERGIA INC ↗
- Who funds ACHILLEA PEER TUTORING INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGE OF STATEN ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pinkerton Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Ira Decamp Foundation Xxxxx2009 · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Redlich Horwitz Foundation · Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption · The New York Community Trust · Hearts to Homes Furnishings Inc · Tiger Foundation · Fund for the City of New York Inc · Conrad N Hilton Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Yorkers for Children Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.