How much did NEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC grant in FY2024?

Human Services$6.1MPublic Benefit$597kHealth$572kEducation$514kSocial Science$400kHousing & Shelter$225kCommunity Improvement$90kPhilanthropy$80kCrime & Legal$30kOther$1.7M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

supply earlyearly headhead startstart classrooms

2019

supply earlyearly headhead startstart classroomsfoundlingsystemsupervision

2020

parent parentfoundlingsystemsupervision

2021

supportspersondisabilities liveafricanparent parentparentspersons

2022

citys ecosystemchangeecosystem smallsmall childchild welfarewelfare carryingcarrying out

2023

city's ecosystemchangeecosystem smallsmall childchild welfarewelfare carryingcarrying out

2024

city's ecosystememotional disturbancedisturbance sedaimschild welfarecarryingout

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$50k–250k15 grants · $1.6M
$250k+1 grant · $432k

$91,136

Median grant

States reached

$12M

Total assets

Largest grants

PUBLIC POLICY LAB$431,715
NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN$202,751
URBAN INSTITUTE$193,953
MERCYFIRST$178,722
NEW YORK COUNCIL ON ADOPTABLE CHILDREN$117,297
DUKE UNIVERSITY$111,485
NOT ON MY WATCH INC$100,000
FOSTER CARE UNPLUGGED FCUP INC$96,821
CORA GROUP INC$91,136
INSTITUTE FOR A RESTORATIVE FUTURE LLC$90,967
NEW TOMORROW PARTNERS LLC (COMMUNITY IMPACT ADVISORS)$75,000
DAY ONE NEW YORK INC$75,000
ADOPTIVE AND FOSTER FAMILY COALITION OF NY$75,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$75,000
THE ALEX HOUSE PROJECT INC$75,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $5.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$9.7M · 30 repeat orgs$579k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$9.7M

$489k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%

+3%

Still filing today

83%

64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CA
CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY (YV LIFESET)
5× · 2018–2022 · $1.4M · revenue +33%
TN
THE NY FOUNDLING (YV LIFESET)
4× · 2019–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +62%
NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $600k · revenue +61%

Funded once

MF
MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY
one grant, 2019 · $90k · revenue -86%
FF
FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK
one grant, 2021 · $80k · revenue -34%
AI
ACKERMAN INSTITUTE FOR THE FAMILY
one grant, 2021 · $68k · revenue -12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Advocates for Children of New York

To ensure a high-quality education for new york students who face barriers to academic success, focusing on students from low-income backgrounds.

Crime & Legal

Families Together in New York

Establish a unified voice for children and youth with emotional, behavioral, and social challenges. the organizational mission is to ensure that every family has access to needed information, support and services.

Human Services

1199SEIUGREATER New York Child Care

To establish child care youth programs and related services for fund eligible 1199 members in order to increase their access to high quality, affordable child care and youth related services and information. to assist parents reconciling…

Membership Benefit

Alternatives for Children

To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.

—

The Child Study Center of New York

To provide a program for children with special needs, ages three to five years by utilizing the disciplines of psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy as integral functions of the educational program.

—

Child Care Associates

To assist family successes through excellence in comprehensive child care and development services.

—

N Y C Mission Society

Nyc mission society improves the lives of families in the city's most underserved communities.

Human Services

Children in Conflict Inc

Children in conflict protects, educates, and provides hope for children caught up in conflict.

Human Services

New York State Childrens' Alliance Inc

The new york state children's alliance is an organization created to promote the development,growth, and continuation of multidisciplinary teams and child advocacy centers throughout new york state in order to better serve abused and…

Crime & Legal

Childnet Youth & Family Services

To provide safe homes, education and counseling to vulnerable children and families.

Human Services

Jewish Family and Children's Service

To support people of all backgrounds to reach their full potential.

Human Services

United Children's Services of

Children's services

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundling and the most unlike its peers is The Urban Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/46

the rest of the field

10%

5,620/57,492

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

35/37

Grantees still filing

29/37

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$6,056,216Other$1,867,269Public Benefit$596,715Health$572,461Education$513,546Social Science$400,000Housing & Shelter$225,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationNY23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption · Hearts to Homes Furnishings Inc · The New York Community Trust · Pinkerton Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Workforce Professionals Training · The Ira Decamp Foundation Xxxxx2009 · Fund for the City of New York Inc · Van Ameringen Foundation Inc · New York Women's Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NOT ON MY WATCH INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~11 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 823809384 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NOT ON MY WATCH INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 11 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to New Yorkers for Children Inc?

Find your warmest path to New Yorkers for Children Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to New Yorkers for Children Inc?

More from the funding graph

NEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to New Yorkers for Children Inc?

More from the funding graph