Skip to content

· Public charity

New York Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association Inc

The organization represents the interest of thousands of new york horse owners and trainers to provide effective leadership for the racing industry.

$1.2M
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$540k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$4.4MAnimals$2.9MPublic Benefit$900kReligion$697kHuman Services$319kRecreation & Sports$181kPhilanthropy$25kOther$0
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $1,015,990, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,213,682 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $197,692 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
  • $250k+2 grants · $850k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEST$540,050
TAKE2 2ND CAREER$310,000
RACETRACK CHAPLAIN$62,900
THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE$25,000
BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION$21,325
PERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEY FUND$21,000
THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE$20,000
VARIOUS BENEVOLENCE UNDER 5000$15,715
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $274k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE: $25k → 15%THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE: $25k → 15%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $26k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $26k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $24k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $23k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $23k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $23k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $22k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $21k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $11k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 14 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$11M
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+182%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
AnimalsHuman ServicesEmploymentPhilanthropyReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BE
    BACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM OF NEW YORK INC
    8× · 2019–2026 · $4.8M · revenue +5% · 33% of their budget
  • T2
    TAKE 2 SECOND CAREER THOROUGHBRED PROGRAM INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $3.0M · revenue +141% · 89% of their budget
  • RT
    RACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY OF AMERICA METROPOLITAN NEW YORK DIVISION
    10× · 2017–2026 · $667k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HEART OF HORSE RACING INC
    one grant, 2025 · $175k
  • TG
    THE GRAYSON FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +182% · 62% of their budget
  • BC
    BENDFGJOCKEY CLUB FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Racing Association Foundation
Animals
2
Kentucky Racing Health and Welfare Fund Inc

To provide exclusively for the benefit, aid, relief, and assistance of the racing personnel employed in connection with horse racing who can demonstrate their need for financial assistance.

—
3
Jana Domino Thoroughbred Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
4
Thoroughbred Charities of America Inc

TCA's mission is to fund and facilitate the support of Thoroughbreds and the people who care for them.

Animals
5
Keeping Racing Alive
Recreation & Sports
6
Southern Tier Harness Horsemen's Association Inc

To promote the welfare of harness racing in new york, and in doing so promote the welfare of our members.

Community Improvement
7
Saratoga Harness Horsepersons Association Inc

To promote harness racing with special regard to the saratoga springs, new york area and promote the welfare of its members.

—
8
Impact Horse- Connecting Humans and Horses
Animals
9
Tierney Equine Foundation
Recreation & Sports
10
Racing Medication and Testing Consortium

The mission of the consortium is to engage in research, education, and advocacy for science-based initiatives that promote the health and safety of the racehorse and the integrity of competition.

Animals
11
Standardbred Racing Investigative Fund

To protect the health, safety, and welfare of horses.

Animals
12
New England Horsemen's Benevolent Protective Association Inc

The organization's main purpose is to promote the sport of thoroughbred horse racing and promote the welfare of the personnel within the industry.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance Foundati Dba Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance; the most unlike its peers is The Grayson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM OF NEW YORK INC: $4,845,570 · EmploymentBACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM OF NEW YORK INCTAKE 2 SECOND CAREER THOROUGHBRED PROGRAM INC: $3,010,000 · AnimalsTAKE 2 SECOND CAREER THOROUGHBRE…+1 more: $100,000 · AnimalsBEST: $900,000 · OtherBESTDONATIONS & GRANTS - VARIOUS OTHERS: $396,356 · OtherDONATIONS & GRANT…VARIOUS BENEVELOLENCE UNDER 5000: $91,551 · OtherVARIOUS BENEVELOL…Individual grant recipient: $85,830 · OtherVARIOUS BENEVOLENCE UNDER 5000: $83,804 · OtherVARIOUS EQUINE UNDER 5000: $67,648 · Other+3 more: $61,001 · OtherRACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY OF AMERICA METROPOLITAN NEW YORK DIVISION: $666,830 · ReligionBelmont Child Care Association Inc: $223,675 · Human ServicesTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE FKA THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE HEART OF HORSE RACING INC: $175,000 · Recreation & SportsPERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC: $119,665 · Philanthropy
Employment$4,845,570Animals$3,110,000Other$1,686,190Religion$666,830Human Services$273,675Recreation & Sports$175,000Philanthropy$119,665

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM OF NEW YORK INC: $4,845,570 over 8y, 33% of budgetTAKE 2 SECOND CAREER THOROUGHBRED PROGRAM INC: $3,010,000 over 10y, 89% of budgetRACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY OF AMERICA METROPOLITAN NEW YORK DIVISION: $666,830 over 10y, 9.8% of budgetBelmont Child Care Association Inc: $223,675 over 10y, 2.3% of budgetPERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC: $119,665 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE FOUNDATI DBA THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE: $100,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE FKA THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE GRAYSON FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 62% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds TAKE 2 SECOND CAREER THOROUGHBRED PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds RACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY OF AMERICA METROPOLITAN NEW YORK DIVISION ↗
  • Who funds Belmont Child Care Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HEART OF HORSE RACING INC ↗
  • Who funds PERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE FOUNDATI DBA THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE FKA THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GRAYSON FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New York Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New York Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New York Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph