· Public charity
New York Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association Inc
The organization represents the interest of thousands of new york horse owners and trainers to provide effective leadership for the racing industry.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $1,237,601 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,434,196 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $196,595 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $88k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $238k
- $250k+2 grants · $903k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BEST | $598,139 |
| TAKE2 2ND CAREER | $305,000 |
| HEART OF HORSE RACING INC | $175,000 |
| RACETRACK CHAPLAIN | $63,000 |
| THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE | $25,000 |
| BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION | $22,000 |
| PERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEY FUND | $21,000 |
| THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE | $20,000 |
| VARIOUS BENEVOLENCE UNDER 5000 | $8,462 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $227k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BEBACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM OF NEW YORK INC7× · 2019–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +5% · 33% of their budget
- T2TAKE 2 SECOND CAREER THOROUGHBRED PROGRAM INC9× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +141% · 89% of their budget
- RTRACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY OF AMERICA METROPOLITAN NEW YORK DIVISION9× · 2017–2025 · $604k · revenue +143%
Funded once
- TGTHE GRAYSON FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +182% · 62% of their budget
- BCBENDFGJOCKEY CLUB FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide exclusively for the benefit, aid, relief, and assistance of the racing personnel employed in connection with horse racing who can demonstrate their need for financial assistance.
TCA's mission is to fund and facilitate the support of Thoroughbreds and the people who care for them.
To promote harness racing with special regard to the saratoga springs, new york area and promote the welfare of its members.
To promote the welfare of harness racing in new york, and in doing so promote the welfare of our members.
The organization's main purpose is to promote the sport of thoroughbred horse racing and promote the welfare of the personnel within the industry.
To protect the health, safety, and welfare of horses.
The mission of the consortium is to engage in research, education, and advocacy for science-based initiatives that promote the health and safety of the racehorse and the integrity of competition.
Kentucky thoroughbred owners & breeders foundation, inc. (ktob foundation) supports and funds equine research, in particular research to study and find a prevention or cure to the condition in horses commonly known as mare reproductive…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance Foundati Dba Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance and the most unlike its peers is The Grayson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds TAKE 2 SECOND CAREER THOROUGHBRED PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds RACE TRACK CHAPLAINCY OF AMERICA METROPOLITAN NEW YORK DIVISION ↗
- Who funds Belmont Child Care Association Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HEART OF HORSE RACING INC ↗
- Who funds PERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE FOUNDATI DBA THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE GRAYSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR THE HORSE FKA THE AAEP FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New York Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.