Skip to content
New York State Tribute Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

New York State Tribute Foundation Inc

To act as a resource to further awareness of issues relating to death and dying, use its knowledge and resources to forge community based partnerships.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$328kHuman Services$244kEducation$131kScience & Tech$52k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $143,350, the rows itemized in this filing. The $160,965 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,615 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN$50,000
NYSFDA$35,000
SUNY CANTON$12,300
HOSPICE-VNSW WPHC INC$10,000
ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$10,000
SIBSPLACE INC$7,250
SCOTT J BEIGEL MEMORIAL FUND$6,500
HUDSON VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$6,150
AMERICAN ACADEMY MCALLISTER INSTITUTE$6,150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $254k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SIBSPLACE INC: $7k → 6%SCOTT J BEIGEL MEMORIAL FUND: $7k → 7%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $50k → 17%SIBSPLACE INC: $7k → 6%COPE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 7%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $50k → 17%THE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF LONG ISLAND: $10k → 7%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $50k → 17%THE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF LONG ISLAND INC: $8k → 7%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $50k → 17%THE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF LONG ISLAND: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$650k · 8 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$650k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+3%

Still filing today

88%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NYS FUNERAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $182k · revenue +32%
  • SM
    ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +59%
  • TN
    The Neighborhood House of Long Island
    3× · 2019–2024 · $23k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • FI
    FDSS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $52k
  • CF
    COPE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -21%
  • MB
    M&T BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
HospiceCare in the Berkshires Inc

Organized to provide hospice and palliative care services to residents of the local Berkshire County community.

Human Services
2
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
3
Hospice of Metropolitan Erie Inc

To provide support to the terminally ill

Human Services
4
Hospice & Palliative Care Inc

To provide end of life care, bereavement counseling and spiritual services to the terminally ill and their families in oneida, herkimer, and eastern madison counties, new york.

—
5
Hospice Care Network

Our mission is to enable persons to live with peace and dignity in a caring environment during the final stages of life by offering care and comfort to both them and to those whom they share their lives.

Human Services
6
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
7
High Peaks Hospice & Palliative Care in

Dignity, comfort and peace at the end of life high peaks hospice & palliative care, inc provides end of life care that listens with respect, cares with compassion, supports with choice, and comforts with understanding wherever you call home

Human Services
8
Hospice of Hillsdale County Inc

Hospice care to the terminally ill & grief counselling to patients families

—
9
Hospice of Chenango County Inc

To provide end of life care and bereavement counseling to the terminally ill and their families in chenango county, new york.

—
10
Smh Case Management Inc

SMH Case Management, Inc. helps patients and families navigate the challenges of caring for a loved one at home by assisting families in accessing a full range of resources and programs within the community. Skilled case managers…

Health
11
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
12
Home Health and Hospice Care

Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for Bereaved Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cope Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NYS FUNERAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION INC: $181,950 · OtherNYS FUNERAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION INCSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON: $83,840 · OtherSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTONFDSS INC: $51,721 · OtherFDSS INCHOSPICE - VNSWWPHC INC: $51,500 · OtherHOSPICE - VNSWWPHC INC+3 more: $19,338 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CHILDRENS GRIEF: $200,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CHILDRENS GRIEFThe Neighborhood House of Long Island: $22,500 · Human ServicesThe Neighborhood House of Long IslandSIBS PLACE INC: $14,500 · Human ServicesSIBS PLACE INCCOPE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $6,500 · Human ServicesST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC: $60,500 · HealthST MARYS …UR MEDICINE HOME CARE CERTIFIED SERVICES INC: $6,000 · HealthUR MEDICI…AMERICAN ACADEMY MCALLISTER INSTITUTE OF FUNERAL SERVICES INC: $35,420 · EducationHUDSON VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,150 · EducationRETHINK THE CONVERSATION LTD: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$388,349Human Services$253,500Health$66,500Education$41,570Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CHILDRENS GRIEF: $200,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetNYS FUNERAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION INC: $181,950 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC: $60,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE - VNSWWPHC INC: $51,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY MCALLISTER INSTITUTE OF FUNERAL SERVICES INC: $35,420 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Neighborhood House of Long Island: $22,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetSIBS PLACE INC: $14,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCOPE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSCOTT J BEIGEL MEMORIAL FUND INC: $6,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUR MEDICINE HOME CARE CERTIFIED SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHope for Bereaved Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetRETHINK THE CONVERSATION LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO3.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New York State Tribute Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New York State Tribute Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New York State Tribute’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home