Skip to content
New York State Rural Housing Coalition Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

New York State Rural Housing Coalition Inc

The coalition is a statewide membership organization dedicated to strengthening and revitalizing rural new york by assisting housing and community development providers.

$75k
Granted FY2020
14
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2020 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,357
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC$5,357
ITHACA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES$5,357
GENESEE VALLEY RURAL PRESERVATION$5,357
SNOW BELT HOUSING CO INC$5,357
PUTNAM COUNTY HOUSING CORP$5,357
ARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT$5,357
WYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION$5,357
CATTARAUGUS COMMUNITY ACTION INC$5,357
MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION$5,357
MOHAWK INDIAN HOUSING CORP$5,357
RUPCO$5,357
VETERANS & COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION$5,357
CHAUTAUQUA OPPORTUNITIES INC$5,357
KEUKA HOUSING COUNCIL INC$5,357
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Otsego Rural Housing Assistance Inc

To address the housing needs of low and moderate income residents of otsego county and to assest in improving housing and related retail and service establishments in rural communities within the county

—
2
Albany County Rural Housing Alliance

Community renewal services

Housing & Shelter
3
Cayuga County Homsite Development Corporation

To help the underpriviledged by providing counseling, job training, rental assistance and housing rehabilitation services to qualified residents

Housing & Shelter
4
Housing Assistance Program of Essex County Inc

To administer section 8 housing in clinton and essex counties, ny while also assisting low income resident complete home purchases and home renovations to maintain safe and adequate housing.

Housing & Shelter
5
Rural Communities Housing Development Corporation - Parent

To provide decent and affordable housing to low and moderate income persons.

Housing & Shelter
6
Community Services Housing Development Corporation

The stabilization of the community's housing stock through the development of low- and moderate income housing, with the creation of ancillary social service programs thereby enabling community residents and tenants to have safe, clean and…

Housing & Shelter
7
Cny Fair Housing Inc

We work to eliminate housing discrimination, promote open communities, and ensure equal access to housing opportunity for all people in central and northern new york.

—
8
Community Affordable Housing Inc

To provide low to moderate income housing.

—
9
Housing Connections Inc

To administer housing assistance programs for low and moderate income persons who are eligible for rental assistance under federal guidelines as mandated by hud.

Housing & Shelter
10
Community Housing Improvement Program

To provide healthy, sustainable, affordable housing to qualified residents of the north valley.

—
11
The Housing Assistance Corporation

The housing assistance corporation is a public, non-profit organization committed to providing safe and affordable housing for persons of limited income living in henderson county and surrounding areas, because we believe every human being…

Housing & Shelter
12
Community Housing Council
Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Genesee Valley Rural Preservation Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RUPCO INC: $5,357 · Housing & ShelterRUPCO INCSNOWBELT HOUSING COMPANY INC: $5,357 · Housing & ShelterSNOWBELT HOUSING COMPANY INCVETERANS & COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION: $5,357 · Housing & ShelterVETERANS & COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITIONMOHAWK INDIAN HOUSING CORPORATION: $5,357 · Housing & ShelterMOHAWK INDIAN HOUSING CORPORATIONITHACA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $5,357 · Housing & ShelterITHACA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INCKEUKA HOUSING COUNCIL INC: $5,357 · Housing & ShelterKEUKA HOUSING COUNCIL INCCHAUTAUQUA OPPORTUNITIES INC: $5,357 · Community ImprovementCHAUTAUQUA OPPORTUNITIES INCWYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $5,357 · Community ImprovementWYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION …DELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC: $5,357 · Community ImprovementDELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INCGENESEE VALLEY RURAL PRESERVATION COUNCIL INC: $5,357 · Community ImprovementGENESEE VALLEY RURAL PRESERVATIO…PUTNAM COUNTY HOUSING CORPORATION: $5,357 · OtherPUTNAM COUNTY HO…CATTARAUGUS COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $5,357 · OtherCATTARAUGUS COMM…ARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT: $5,357 · HealthMOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $5,357 · Human Services
Housing & Shelter$32,142Community Improvement$21,428Other$10,714Health$5,357Human Services$5,357

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT: $5,357 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUPCO INC: $5,357 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA OPPORTUNITIES INC: $5,357 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $5,357 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC: $5,357 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSNOWBELT HOUSING COMPANY INC: $5,357 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPUTNAM COUNTY HOUSING CORPORATION: $5,357 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGENESEE VALLEY RURAL PRESERVATION COUNCIL INC: $5,357 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS & COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION: $5,357 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCATTARAUGUS COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $5,357 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $5,357 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOHAWK INDIAN HOUSING CORPORATION: $5,357 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetITHACA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $5,357 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEUKA HOUSING COUNCIL INC: $5,357 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New York State Rural Housing Coalition Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New York State Rural Housing Coalition Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New York State Rural Housing Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home