· Public charity
New York State Rural Housing Coalition Inc
The coalition is a statewide membership organization dedicated to strengthening and revitalizing rural new york by assisting housing and community development providers.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATTARAUGUS COMMUNITY ACTION INC | $5,357 |
| ITHACA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES | $5,357 |
| KEUKA HOUSING COUNCIL INC | $5,357 |
| WYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION | $5,357 |
| MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION | $5,357 |
| MOHAWK INDIAN HOUSING CORP | $5,357 |
| RUPCO | $5,357 |
| GENESEE VALLEY RURAL PRESERVATION | $5,357 |
| PUTNAM COUNTY HOUSING CORP | $5,357 |
| ARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT | $5,357 |
| VETERANS & COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION | $5,357 |
| CHAUTAUQUA OPPORTUNITIES INC | $5,357 |
| SNOW BELT HOUSING CO INC | $5,357 |
| DELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC | $5,357 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To address the housing needs of low and moderate income residents of otsego county and to assest in improving housing and related retail and service establishments in rural communities within the county
Community renewal services
To help the underpriviledged by providing counseling, job training, rental assistance and housing rehabilitation services to qualified residents
To administer section 8 housing in clinton and essex counties, ny while also assisting low income resident complete home purchases and home renovations to maintain safe and adequate housing.
To provide decent and affordable housing to low and moderate income persons.
The stabilization of the community's housing stock through the development of low- and moderate income housing, with the creation of ancillary social service programs thereby enabling community residents and tenants to have safe, clean and…
We work to eliminate housing discrimination, promote open communities, and ensure equal access to housing opportunity for all people in central and northern new york.
To provide low to moderate income housing.
To administer housing assistance programs for low and moderate income persons who are eligible for rental assistance under federal guidelines as mandated by hud.
To provide healthy, sustainable, affordable housing to qualified residents of the north valley.
The housing assistance corporation is a public, non-profit organization committed to providing safe and affordable housing for persons of limited income living in henderson county and surrounding areas, because we believe every human being…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Genesee Valley Rural Preservation Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds RUPCO INC ↗
- Who funds CHAUTAUQUA OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds SNOWBELT HOUSING COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds PUTNAM COUNTY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GENESEE VALLEY RURAL PRESERVATION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds VETERANS & COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION ↗
- Who funds CATTARAUGUS COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds MOHAWK VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds MOHAWK INDIAN HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ITHACA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds KEUKA HOUSING COUNCIL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New York State Rural Housing Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.