Skip to content

· Public charity

New York State Casa Assoc Inc

To broadly support and develop local volunteer advocacy on behalf of the best interests of abused and neglected children in new york state.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$206k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$3.4MHealth$3.0MHuman Services$1.6M
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$91,261
Median grant
1
States reached
$916k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MHA OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC$205,692
EAC$159,777
CASA OF ROCHESTERMONROE COUNTY$130,673
GREATER MENTAL HEALTH OF NY INC$125,451
THE RESOLUTION CENTER INC$107,545
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY JUSTICE$101,613
ACCESSCNY$91,261
CASA OF THE SOUTHERN TIER$86,408
MHA OF DUTCHESS COUNTY$86,293
DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER$82,214
ACCORD A CTR FOR DISPUTE RES$60,743
CASA OF CHATAUQUA COUNTY$56,553
GENESEE COUNTY CASA$55,651
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $534k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CASA OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $86k → 13%CASA OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $77k → 13%CASA OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $75k → 13%CASA OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $75k → 13%CASA OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $74k → 13%CASA OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $69k → 13%CASA OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $28k → 13%CASA OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $27k → 13%CASA OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $23k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.7M · 14 repeat orgs$294k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -35% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$7.7M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-35%

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $266k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ERIE COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $964k · revenue +15%
  • EI
    EAC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $892k · revenue +45%
  • CO
    CASA of Rochester-Monroe County Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $717k · revenue +62% · 78% of their budget

Funded once

  • CA
    Court Appointed Special Advocates
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • CC
    CENTRO CIVICO INC
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue -67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Voices for Children Advocacy

Voices For Children is dedicated to serving the child victim and victim families of child abuse in Genesee & Shiawassee County and enhancing the lives of all children through education and increasing community involvement.

Crime & Legal
2
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Camden County Inc

Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.

—
3
Casa Childrens Intervention Services Inc

Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.

Civil Rights
4
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Cook County

CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.

Crime & Legal
5
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
6
Children's Advocacy Center of Suffolk County Inc

To unite public, private and community partners to ensure safety, healing and justice for children and families impacted by violence, exploitation and abuse.

Crime & Legal
7
Canadian County Casa Inc

Serve nbsp;as nbsp;court nbsp;appointed nbsp;special nbsp;advocates nbsp;for nbsp;abused nbsp;and nbsp;neglected nbsp;children nbsp;in nbsp;the nbsp;judicial nbsp;system

Crime & Legal
8
Casa of Central Virginia Inc

Casa of central va, inc. recruits, trains and supports volunteer advocates for abused and neglected children involved in juvenile court proceedings in the 24th judicial district and educates the community about the needs of these children.

Civil Rights
9
Casa of Kosciusko County Inc

Casa is committed to speaking in the best interest of children, who are at risk for abuse and neglect. casa recruits, trains, & supports volunteers to serve at-risk children in the family court system.

Civil Rights
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc

Recruit, train and supervise volunteers to advocate for abused, neglected and abandoned children placed in foster homes. CASA volunteers ensure children's best interests remain the priority and their needs met while working to establish a…

—
11
Child Advocates of Connecticut Inc

Child Advocates of Connecticut (CAC) transforms the lives of vulnerable children and youth by providing trained and supervised one-on-one volunteer advocates in the community, classroom and courtroom.

—
12
Casa-Voices for Children

To recruit, train and supervise community volunteers to advocate for children/youth who have experienced abuse and/or neglect who are within the legal jurisdiction of the state.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eac Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mental Health America of Dutchess County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EAC INC: $891,964 · OtherEAC INCCASA of Rochester-Monroe County Inc: $716,678 · OtherCASA of Rochester-Monroe County IncTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY JUSTICE INC: $627,355 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY JUSTICE INCMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $238,390 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ROCKLAND …MHA OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $205,692 · OtherMHA OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC+2 more: $27,190 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ERIE COUNTY INC: $964,374 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ERIE C…GREATER MENTAL HEALTH OF NEW YORK INC F/K/N MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF WEST: $707,115 · HealthGREATER MENTAL HEALTH OF NEW YORK I…ACCESSCNY INC: $457,025 · HealthACCESSCNY INCMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC: $403,842 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF DUTCHESS C…DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC: $651,049 · Crime & LegalDISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER …THE RESOLUTION CENTER INC: $449,550 · Crime & LegalTHE RESOLUTION CENTER INCACCORD A CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION INC: $377,687 · Crime & LegalACCORD A CENTER FOR DISPUT…CASA OF CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC: $351,454 · Crime & LegalCASA OF CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY …+1 more: $60,743 · Crime & LegalCASA of the Southern Tier Inc: $533,832 · Human ServicesGenesee County CASA for Children Inc co Genesee County Court: $312,743 · Civil Rights
Other$2,707,269Health$2,532,356Crime & Legal$1,890,483Human Services$533,832Civil Rights$312,743

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ERIE COUNTY INC: $964,374 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetEAC INC: $891,964 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCASA of Rochester-Monroe County Inc: $716,678 over 9y, 78% of budgetGREATER MENTAL HEALTH OF NEW YORK INC F/K/N MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF WEST: $707,115 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetDISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC: $651,049 over 9y, 11% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY JUSTICE INC: $627,355 over 9y, 21% of budgetCASA of the Southern Tier Inc: $533,832 over 9y, 64% of budgetACCESSCNY INC: $457,025 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RESOLUTION CENTER INC: $449,550 over 9y, 25% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC: $403,842 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetACCORD A CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION INC: $377,687 over 8y, 15% of budgetCASA OF CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC: $351,454 over 9y, 36% of budgetGenesee County CASA for Children Inc co Genesee County Court: $312,743 over 9y, 67% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $238,390 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDRENCOURT APPOINTED SPEC ADVOCATES: $60,743 over 1y, 23% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates: $14,431 over 1y, 20% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ERIE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds EAC INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Rochester-Monroe County Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MENTAL HEALTH OF NEW YORK INC F/K/N MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF WEST ↗
  • Who funds DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA of the Southern Tier Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSCNY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RESOLUTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCORD A CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Genesee County CASA for Children Inc co Genesee County Court ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDRENCOURT APPOINTED SPEC ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO CIVICO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mother Cabrini Health Foundation IncNY13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New York State Casa Assoc Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New York State Casa Assoc Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New York State Casa Assoc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph