· Public charity
New York State Casa Assoc Inc
To broadly support and develop local volunteer advocacy on behalf of the best interests of abused and neglected children in new york state.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MHA OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC | $205,692 |
| EAC | $159,777 |
| CASA OF ROCHESTERMONROE COUNTY | $130,673 |
| GREATER MENTAL HEALTH OF NY INC | $125,451 |
| THE RESOLUTION CENTER INC | $107,545 |
| CENTER FOR COMMUNITY JUSTICE | $101,613 |
| ACCESSCNY | $91,261 |
| CASA OF THE SOUTHERN TIER | $86,408 |
| MHA OF DUTCHESS COUNTY | $86,293 |
| DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER | $82,214 |
| ACCORD A CTR FOR DISPUTE RES | $60,743 |
| CASA OF CHATAUQUA COUNTY | $56,553 |
| GENESEE COUNTY CASA | $55,651 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $534k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against -35% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $266k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ERIE COUNTY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $964k · revenue +15%- EIEAC INC9× · 2017–2025 · $892k · revenue +45%
- COCASA of Rochester-Monroe County Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $717k · revenue +62% · 78% of their budget
Funded once
- CACourt Appointed Special Advocatesone grant, 2017 · $14k
- CCCENTRO CIVICO INCone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue -67%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Voices For Children is dedicated to serving the child victim and victim families of child abuse in Genesee & Shiawassee County and enhancing the lives of all children through education and increasing community involvement.
Advocate in the judicial system for the best interest of victims of abuse and neglect in foster care, giving the child a voice in court and moving the child to a safe and permanent home.
Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.
CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.
Child Advocacy Services
To unite public, private and community partners to ensure safety, healing and justice for children and families impacted by violence, exploitation and abuse.
Serve nbsp;as nbsp;court nbsp;appointed nbsp;special nbsp;advocates nbsp;for nbsp;abused nbsp;and nbsp;neglected nbsp;children nbsp;in nbsp;the nbsp;judicial nbsp;system
Casa of central va, inc. recruits, trains and supports volunteer advocates for abused and neglected children involved in juvenile court proceedings in the 24th judicial district and educates the community about the needs of these children.
Casa is committed to speaking in the best interest of children, who are at risk for abuse and neglect. casa recruits, trains, & supports volunteers to serve at-risk children in the family court system.
Recruit, train and supervise volunteers to advocate for abused, neglected and abandoned children placed in foster homes. CASA volunteers ensure children's best interests remain the priority and their needs met while working to establish a…
Child Advocates of Connecticut (CAC) transforms the lives of vulnerable children and youth by providing trained and supervised one-on-one volunteer advocates in the community, classroom and courtroom.
To recruit, train and supervise community volunteers to advocate for children/youth who have experienced abuse and/or neglect who are within the legal jurisdiction of the state.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eac Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mental Health America of Dutchess County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ERIE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds EAC INC ↗
- Who funds CASA of Rochester-Monroe County Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER MENTAL HEALTH OF NEW YORK INC F/K/N MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF WEST ↗
- Who funds DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds CASA of the Southern Tier Inc ↗
- Who funds ACCESSCNY INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESOLUTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ACCORD A CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Genesee County CASA for Children Inc co Genesee County Court ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDRENCOURT APPOINTED SPEC ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates ↗
- Who funds CENTRO CIVICO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New York State Casa Assoc Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.