Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

New York City Environmental Justice Alliance Inc

Founded in 1991, the new york city environmental justice alliance (nyc-eja) is a non-profit, 501(c)3 city-wide membership network linking grassroots organizations from low-income neighborhoods and communities of color in their struggle for environmental justice.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$198k
Largest
01What you fund
0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$798kCommunity Improvement$584kEnvironment$191kPublic Benefit$160kHousing & Shelter$135kEducation$10kOther$1.1M
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.1M
$143,333
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPROSE INC$198,332
THE POINT CDC$173,333
NY RENEWS$160,000
WE STAY-NOS QUEDAMOS INC$148,515
EL PUENTE$143,333
GOOD OLD LOWER EAST SIDE INC$143,333
BROOKLYN MOVEMENT CENTER$66,667
THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL$66,667
BUILDING EQUITY AND ALIGNMENT$18,990
PRATT INSTITUTE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GREEN ROOTS: $20k → 16%PUSH BUFFALO: $50k → 13%ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES OF NY: $58k → 14%TRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGN: $58k → 17%BROOKLYN MOVEMENT CENTER: $133k → 20%WE STAY-NOS QUEDAMOS INC: $149k → 28%GROUNDSWELL: $10k → 14%CAPA STRATEGIES LLC: $6k → 12%CT COALITION ENVIRONMENT JUSTICE: $20k → 11%ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMUNITY AND: $20k → 16%PUSH BUFFALO: $40k → 13%ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES OF NY: $25k → 14%NY LAWYERS FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $25k → 17%BROOKLYN MOVEMENT CENTER: $67k → 20%WE STAY-NOS QUEDAMOS INC: $138k → 28%SUSTAINABLE CAPITAL ADVISORS: $120k → 14%PUSH BUFFALO: $25k → 13%THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL: $67k → 17%PRATT INSTITUTE: $10k → 20%THE POINT CDC: $173k → 28%SUSTAINABLE CAPITAL ADVISORS: $25k → 14%PUSH BUFFALO: $20k → 13%GOOD OLD LOWER EAST SIDE INC: $143k → 17%EL PUENTE: $187k → 20%THE POINT CDC: $172k → 28%SUSTAINABLE CAPITAL ADVISORS: $20k → 14%GOOD OLD LOWER EAST SIDE INC: $133k → 17%EL PUENTE: $143k → 20%THE POINT CDC: $15k → 28%SUSTAINABLE CAPITAL ADVISORS: $13k → 14%BUILDING EQUITY AND ALIGNMENT: $19k → 17%UPROSE INC: $198k → 20%SUSTAINABLE CAPITAL ADVISORS: $5k → 14%UPROSE INC: $183k → 20%UPROSE INC: $125k → 20%UPROSE INC: $70k → 20%UPROSE INC: $55k → 20%UPROSE INC: $50k → 20%UPROSE INC: $50k → 20%NY RENEWS: $160k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 9 repeat orgs$535k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$2.5M
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+15%

Still filing today

78%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $256k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UI
    UPROSE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $732k · revenue +200%
  • TP
    The Point Community Development Corporation
    3× · 2021–2024 · $360k · revenue +64%
  • EP
    EL PUENTE DE WILLIAMSBURG INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $330k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SC
    SUSTAINABLE CAPITAL ADVISORS
    one grant, 2022 · $120k
  • TT
    TRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $58k · revenue 0%
  • NY
    New York Lawyers for the Public Interest Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Restoration Project

New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…

Environment
2
New York City Environmental Justice Alliance Inc

Founded in 1991, the new york city environmental justice alliance (nyc-eja) is a non-profit, 501(c)3 city-wide membership network linking grassroots organizations from low-income neighborhoods and communities of color in their struggle for…

Environment
3
Design Trust for Public Space Inc

The Design Trust for Public Space is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the future of public space in New York City. Our projects bring together city agencies, community groups and private sector experts to make a lasting impact -…

Environment
4
Energy Justice Law and Policy Center

The organization is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, and scientific purposes under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or corresponding section of any future federal tax code.

Environment
5
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
6
New York City Energy Efficiency Corporation

Nyceec's mission is to deliver financing solutions and advance markets for energy efficiency and clean energy in communities.

Environment
7
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
8
Community Development Project Inc

Takeroot justice provides legal, participatory research and policy support to strengthen the work of grassroots and community-based groups in new york city to dismantle racial, economic and social oppression.

Community Improvement
9
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
10
Openplans Inc

Open plans' mission is to transform how people experience new york city's streets. open plans uses grassroots advocacy and policy change to inspire structural reforms and cultural shifts. we promote a people-first street culture that…

Public Benefit
11
New Economy Project Inc

New economy project's mission is to work with community groups to build a just economy that works for all, by fostering cooperative and community-led development and challenging systems that fuel inequality and poverty.

Community Improvement
12
Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice

The organization is known as the leader in the movement and is seen as the "go to" experts on environmental justice and sustainable redevelopment because of its knowledge and its network.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pratt Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Point Community Development Corporation — $360,000 · OtherThe Point Community Development Corporatio…EL PUENTE DE WILLIAMSBURG INC — $330,000 · OtherEL PUENTE DE WILLIAMSBURG INCBROOKLYN MOVEMENT CENTER — $200,000 · OtherBROOKLYN MOVEMENT CENTERSUSTAINABLE CAPITAL ADVISORS — $120,000 · OtherSUSTAINABLE CAPITAL ADVISORSIndividual grant recipient — $62,539 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+3 more — $51,000 · OtherUPROSE INC — $731,665 · Youth DevelopmentUPROSE INCTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC — $66,667 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INCWE STAY-NOS QUEDAMOS INC — $286,848 · Community ImprovementWE STAY-NOS QUEDAMOS I…GOOD OLD LOWER EAST SIDE INC — $276,666 · Community ImprovementGOOD OLD LOWER EAST SI…ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENT INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC — $83,333 · EnvironmentTRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGN INC — $58,333 · EnvironmentGREENROOTS INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $18,990 · EnvironmentGROUNDSWELL INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentSTATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $160,000 · Public BenefitPEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INC — $135,035 · Housing & ShelterPRATT INSTITUTE — $10,000 · Education
Other$1,123,539Youth Development$798,332Community Improvement$583,514Environment$190,656Public Benefit$160,000Housing & Shelter$135,035Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUPROSE INC — $731,665 over 7y, 10% of budgetThe Point Community Development Corporation — $360,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetEL PUENTE DE WILLIAMSBURG INC — $330,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetWE STAY-NOS QUEDAMOS INC — $286,848 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetGOOD OLD LOWER EAST SIDE INC — $276,666 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetSTATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $160,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INC — $135,035 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC — $83,333 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC — $66,667 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGN INC — $58,333 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetNew York Lawyers for the Public Interest Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGREENROOTS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $18,990 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROUNDSWELL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPRATT INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC24.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Scherman Foundation Inc · United States Energy Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Solutions Project Inc · Patagoniaorg · Movement Strategy Center · Windward Fund · West Harlem Environmental Action Inc · Freedom Together Foundation · Tides Foundation · The New York Community Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization New York City Environmental Justice Alliance Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Greenroots Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to New York City Environmental Justice Alliance Inc?

Find your warmest path to New York City Environmental Justice Alliance Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph