Skip to content

· Public charity

New York City Business Assistance Corporation

To reduce unemployment, promote and provide for additional and maximum employment in NYC, encourage the development and/or retention of businesses in NYC; instruct or train individuals to improve and develop their capabilities for jobs in business and encourage economic devt.

$12k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
—
States reached
$311k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Community Improvement$1.5MEmployment$376kHousing & Shelter$159kArts & Culture$135kEducation$90kCrime & Legal$75kPhilanthropy$67kHealth$50kOther$0
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $250k+1 grant · $311k
$311,413
Median grant
—
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Workforce Development Corporation$311,413
Individual grant recipient$12,375
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Rockaway Business Alliance: $51k → 6%Long Island City Partnership: $100k → 13%Community Solutions International Inc: $80k → 17%Caliper Studio Inc: $50k → 20%Women's Housing & Eco Development Corp: $47k → 28%Park's Clothing Corp: $16k → 13%Chinatown Partnership: $79k → 17%Myrtle Avenue Revitalization Project LDC: $58k → 20%Youth Ministries for Peace and Justice: $75k → 28%Tino's Unisex Hairstyling: $15k → 13%Chinatown Partnership: $21k → 17%Myrtle Avenue Revitalization Project LDC: $42k → 20%Second Millenium Enterprises Inc: $10k → 13%Community Solutions International Inc: $20k → 17%Flatbush Nostrand Junction BID: $7k → 20%Jontue Discount Boutique: $7k → 13%IDG Seaport Corp: $20k → 17%Flatbush Nostrand Junction: $91k → 20%Perfect Properties Corp: $7k → 13%The Old Seaport Alliance: $20k → 17%Woodhull Community DMA Inc: $35k → 20%Eazy LocksLLC: $6k → 13%Lighthouse Fishmarket Inc: $20k → 17%Downtown Brooklyn Partnership: $58k → 20%Harmony Cakes & Pastries: $5k → 13%Bruno In Harlem Inc: $20k → 17%Downtown Brooklyn Partnership: $42k → 20%Sutphin Boulevard DMA Inc: $88k → 13%Beach 116th Street Partnership: $30k → 13%Beach 116th Street Partnership: $19k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of New York City Business Assistance Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 59%.

New York City Business Assistance Corporationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$884k · 10 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
43

Total granted

$884k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+3%

Still filing today

40%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $324k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
Community ImprovementHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $100k · revenue +99%
  • CP
    CHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP
    2× · 2018–2019 · $100k · revenue +57% · 31% of their budget
  • FN
    FLATBUSH NOSTRAND JUNCTION DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $99k · revenue +56% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LONG ISLAND CITY PARTNERSHIP INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -17%
  • SB
    SUTPHIN BOULEVARD DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $88k · revenue +448% · 35% of their budget
  • RK
    Rockaway KB Company LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Myrtle Avenue Brooklyn District Management Association Inc

To promote the growth of local businesses located in the business improvement district and enhance the overall appearance of the business community.

Community Improvement
2
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
3
Greater Port Washington Business Improvement District Association

The organization is a district management association established pursuant to General Municipal Law Sect. 980-M to carry out the activities of the business improvement district established by the Town of North Hempstead. The purpose of the…

Community Improvement
4
Union Square Partnership District Management Association Inc

The organization provides supplemental sanitation, public safety, streetscape improvement, visitor information and commercial support services to property owners, businesses and residents of an area established as a business improvement…

Community Improvement
5
East New York Restoration Local Development Corp

East New York Restoration was incorporated to oversee the implementation of the community benefit agreement with the related companies for the expansion of the Gateway Mall center. Functions are job readiness and referral

Community Improvement
6
West Village District Management Association Inc

To improve neighborhood conditions in the west village business improvement district and to enhance the cleanliness, safety and enjoyment of the district.

Community Improvement
7
Chinatown District Management Association Inc

The organization provides supplemental sanitation, streetscape improvement, visitor information and commercial support services to property owners, businesses and residents of an area established as a business improvement district.

Human Services
8
Downtown Manhattan Inc

Downtown manhattan, inc. is a not-for-profit community volunteer organization working in the areas of economic development, street design, retail and business recruitment and marketing and promotion. it is our mission to increase consumer…

—
9
The Downtownwaterfront Business Improvement Dist Inc of Yonkers Ny

The yonkers downtown/waterfront business improvement district shall serve the special improvement district identified within its geographically specified bounds, the yonkers business community and the city of yonkers to formulate, promote…

Community Improvement
10
Lenape Bloemendael District Management Assoc Inc

The Columbus Amsterdam Business Improvement District was created to increase commercial activity create a more vital active business center along Columbus Amsterdam Avenues from West 96th to West 110th Street by providing services…

Community Improvement
11
Hudson Square District Management Association Incorporated

To assist in the overall economic improvement of the hudson square district by improving traffic management and safety, streetscape design, and marketing.

Community Improvement
12
Queens Economic Development Corporation

The Organization creates and retains jobs through establishing programs throughout neighborhoods that assist small businesses and promote tourism and business development.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Downtown Brooklyn Partnership Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rockaway Business Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rockaway Business Alliance Inc: $100,001 · OtherRockaway Business Alliance IncMyrtle Avenue Commercial Revitalization and Development Project LDC: $99,983 · OtherMyrtle Avenue Commercial Revitalization and Development Project …Kepco Inc: $90,000 · OtherKepco IncPC Learning Centers: $90,000 · OtherPC Learning CentersArthur Cantina Inc: $90,000 · OtherArthur Cantina IncRockaway KB Company LLC: $75,000 · OtherYOUTH MINISTRIES FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE: $75,000 · OtherUrban Health Plan Inc: $50,000 · OtherCaliper Studio Inc: $50,000 · Other+35 more: $703,851 · Other+35 moreTHE LONG ISLAND CITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementTHE LONG ISLAND CITY PAR…CHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP: $99,998 · Community ImprovementCHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LO…DOWNTOWN BROOKLYN PARTNERSHIP INC: $99,731 · Community ImprovementDOWNTOWN BROOKLYN PARTNE…FLATBUSH NOSTRAND JUNCTION DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $98,899 · Community ImprovementFLATBUSH NOSTRAND JUNCTI…SUTPHIN BOULEVARD DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $87,500 · Community ImprovementSUTPHIN BOULEVARD DISTRI…SOUTHWEST BROOKLYN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $34,588 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST BROOKLYN INDUS…OLD SEAPORT ALLIANCE: $19,600 · Community ImprovementWorkforce Development Corporation: $311,413 · EducationWorkforce Deve…COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterWOMEN'S HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $47,259 · Housing & ShelterNO LONGER EMPTY INC: $75,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,423,835Community Improvement$540,316Education$311,413Housing & Shelter$147,259Arts & Culture$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWorkforce Development Corporation: $311,413 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetRockaway Business Alliance Inc: $100,001 over 2y, 60% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LONG ISLAND CITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $100,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP: $99,998 over 2y, 31% of budgetMyrtle Avenue Commercial Revitalization and Development Project LDC: $99,983 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN BROOKLYN PARTNERSHIP INC: $99,731 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFLATBUSH NOSTRAND JUNCTION DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $98,899 over 2y, 31% of budgetSUTPHIN BOULEVARD DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $87,500 over 1y, 35% of budgetWOMEN'S HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $47,259 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST BROOKLYN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $34,588 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetOLD SEAPORT ALLIANCE: $19,600 over 1y, 41% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Workforce Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Rockaway Business Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LONG ISLAND CITY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds Myrtle Avenue Commercial Revitalization and Development Project LDC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN BROOKLYN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds FLATBUSH NOSTRAND JUNCTION DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SUTPHIN BOULEVARD DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NO LONGER EMPTY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BROOKLYN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds OLD SEAPORT ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Workforce Development CorporationNY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Workforce Development Corporation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New York City Business Assistance Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New York City Business Assistance Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New York City Business Assistance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph