How much did NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS grant in FY2024?

NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS reported 2 grants totaling $51,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS based?

NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS is based in NH.

NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS

The NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS strengthens and gives voice to the state's nonprofit sector by providing leadership development programs, facilitating collaboration, and offering learning opportunities for nonprofit leaders, staff, and volunteers.

$51k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$6k

Largest

01What you fund

0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Philanthropy$88kHousing & Shelter$15kFood & Nutrition$12kReligion$8kEducation$7kYouth Development$7kEnvironment$6kHuman Services$5kArts & Culture$5kOther$30k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

canterbury shakershaker villageadoptionbuildchildrenrecreationalenhance

2021

housingdedicated fosteringfostering growthgrowth independenceindependence vocationalvocational socialadults

2022

motorless flightfranconiatrainingsoaringrecreationalstudentsmascoma valley

2024

distant hillnatureeducationadults

2025

studentsmascoma valleyvalley district

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$6,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

FRIENDS OF DUSTANT HILL$6,000
THE CORNUCOPIA PROJECT$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5% — the area typically sits at 6%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$118k · 4 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +257% since the first grant, against +66% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$118k

$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+257%

+66%

Still filing today

100%

89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyHousing & ShelterReligionEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FO
FRIENDS OF MASCOMA FOUNDATION
3× · 2020–2022 · $66k · revenue +341%
FI
FRIENDS IN ACTION
3× · 2020–2022 · $22k · revenue +27%
CITY YEAR NEW HAMPSHIRE
2× · 2020–2021 · $17k · revenue +8%

Funded once

OP
OUR PLACEgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue +437%
CH
CITY HOPE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
one grant, 2021 · $8k
TN
THE NICK RECREATION PARKgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +454%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Friends of Fort Williams Park

To preserve and enhance the natural and historic resources of Fort Williams Park for future generations by providing funding support and stewardship for selected projects in the park.

Recreation & Sports

Friends of Lancaster for

To promote responsible building.

Environment

Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage

—

North Yarmouth Historical Society

The purposes of this corporation are to collect, preserve and share the history of North Yarmouth (the area encompassed by the original settlement) as well as to promote interest and appreciation of the character of the present town of…

—

Falmouth Historical Society Inc

The mission of the falmouth historical society, through the museums on the green, is to provide educational programs, and to preserve, share and celebrate the history and culture of the cape cod town of falmouth.

Unclassified

The Colonial Society of Massachusetts

—

Land's Sake Inc

A working model of practical land stewardship and natural resources conservation which provides programs to the community on sustainable land management.

Environment

Fallbrook Land Conservancy

To acquire, protect, and manage open space in perpetuity for the benefit of wildlife and the community.

Environment

Worcester Natural History Society Inc

Ecotarium's mission is to inspire a passion for science and nature among all members of the community through one-of-a-kind experiences, interactive exhibits, and accessible programming. as new england's leading science and nature center,…

Arts & Culture

New England Village Inc

New england village's mission is to empower adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to realize their potential and pursue their dreams through innovative programs and community living.

Human Services

Friends of the Blue Hills Charitable Trust

The Friends of the Blue Hills (FBH) mission is to preserve and protect the Blue Hills Reservations natural beauty, diverse natural habitats and many recreational opportunities.

—

Friends of the Public Garden Inc

To work with boston's department of parks and recreation to preserve, protect and enhance boston's first public parks: the common, the public garden and the commonwealth avenue mall.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wolfeboro Area Recreation and the most unlike its peers is The 1833 Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

11/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Philanthropy$88,115Other$46,900Housing & Shelter$14,820Food & Nutrition$12,370Religion$7,600Education$7,350Youth Development$6,726

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OUR PLACE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~57 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 611951087 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OUR PLACE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 57 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to New Hampshire Center for Nonprofits?

Find your warmest path to New Hampshire Center for Nonprofits through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to New Hampshire Center for Nonprofits?

More from the funding graph

NEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR NONPROFITS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to New Hampshire Center for Nonprofits?

More from the funding graph