Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

New Era Colorado Foundation

New Era Colorado Foundation Organizes young people to participate in the political process, develop as leaders, and find a political home.

$921k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Public Benefit$836kCivil Rights$516kHealth$160kEnvironment$50kHuman Services$45kReligion$16kYouth Development$6k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
  • $250k+2 grants · $600k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cobalt Foundation$350,000
Alliance for Youth Organizing$250,000
New Era Colorado Action Fund$150,000
Coloradans For Protecting Rep$100,000
United for New Economy$35,000
CO Immigrant Rights Coalition$10,000
Soul 2 Sisters$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%United for New Economy: $35k → 10%United for New Economy: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$641k · 3 repeat orgs$989k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$641k
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+54%

Still filing today

100%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $710k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24
Civil RightsPublic BenefitReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NE
    New Era Colorado Action Fund
    4× · 2019–2024 · $580k · revenue +164% · 32% of their budget
  • UF
    UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $45k · revenue -58%
  • S2
    SOUL 2 SOUL SISTERS
    2× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue -13%

Funded once

  • AA
    ABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL
    one grant, 2020 · $145k
  • AF
    ACLU FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +54%
  • CF
    Coloradans For Protecting Rep
    one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado People's Action

Colorado people's action (cpa) is a member-driven, racial justice organization dedicated to winning long-lasting progressive public policies in colorado. cpa builds power by mobilizing voters, electing our own people to office, holding…

2
Protect Colorados Vote

To oppose a colorado statewide ballot initiative to join the national popular vote compact

3
American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado

To protect, defend, and extend the civil rights and civil liberties of all people in Colorado through litigation, education, and advocacy

4
Colorado People's Alliance

Colorado people's alliance (copa) is a racial justice, member-driven organization dedicated to advancing and winning progressive social change locally, statewide and nationally. copa builds power to improve the lives of all coloradans…

Human Services
5
United for a New Economy Action

Une action builds people power for racial and economic justice so all coloradans thrive. we do this by organizing in our communities across race, winning bold policy solutions for all, and building a multiracial voting majority that…

Human Services
6
Colorado Rising State Action

The organization is focused on holding special interest networks accountable and advancing conservative principles. We're fighting for limited government, lowering taxes, fighting government over-regulation that stifles freedom, free…

7
Unite for Colorado

To promote the common good and general welfare of americans by promoting public policy that strengthens the economy, promotes job growth, and supports fair and reasonable business regulations.

8
Colorado Organization for Latina Opportunity and Reproductive Rights

Colorado organization for latina opportunity and reproductive rights (color) is a community-rooted nonprofit organization that works to enable latinx individuals and their families lead safe, healthy, self-determined lives.

Health
9
Coloradans for Food Justice

Coloradans for food justice is building community power by making sure that every eater in colorado has a voice to make transformative change that represents a more just food system by mobilizing values-driven voters statewide.

10
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

11
New Era Colorado Foundation

New Era Colorado Foundation Organizes young people to participate in the political process, develop as leaders, and find a political home.

Civil Rights
12
Colorado Values Project

We mobilize coloradans to engage their public officials to protect the colorado way of life. we advocate for public policy that embraces the colorado values of fairness, responsibility, opportunity and freedom.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coloradans for Protecting Reproductive Freedom and the most unlike its peers is Project Voyce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COBALT FOUNDATION — $350,000 · Civil RightsCOBALT FOUNDATIONALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $250,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZINGACLU FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC — $50,000 · Civil RightsACLU FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC+2 more — $16,250 · Civil RightsNew Era Colorado Action Fund — $580,000 · Public BenefitNew Era Colorado Action FundABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL — $145,000 · OtherABORTION ACCESS FOR …COLORADANS FOR PROTECTING REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM — $100,000 · OtherCOLORADANS FOR PROTE…Coloradans For Protecting Rep — $50,000 · OtherColoradans For Prote…+1 more — $6,250 · OtherUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $45,000 · Human ServicesSOUL 2 SOUL SISTERS — $16,250 · ReligionTHE ARCHER GROUP — $15,000 · HealthProject VOYCE — $6,250 · Youth Development
Civil Rights$666,250Public Benefit$580,000Other$301,250Human Services$45,000Religion$16,250Health$15,000Youth Development$6,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNew Era Colorado Action Fund — $580,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetCOBALT FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $250,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetABORTION ACCESS FOR ALL — $145,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOLORADANS FOR PROTECTING REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM — $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $45,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetSOUL 2 SOUL SISTERS — $16,250 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ARCHER GROUP — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetProject VOYCE — $6,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYoung African Americans for Social and Political Activism — $6,250 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community FoundationCO23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Colorado Health Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · The Colorado Trust · Impactassetsinc · Chinook Fund Inc · The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc · Mile High United Way Inc · Merle Chambers Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization New Era Colorado Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph