Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

New Discovery Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Community Improvement$14kPhilanthropy$12kYouth Development$11kEducation$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kHousing & Shelter$6kHuman Services$5kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLINTRIDGE CENTER$5,000
DAY ONE$5,000
PASADENA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$5,000
EL MONTE POLICE DEPT$2,000
DORIS DANN KIDS CAMPUS$2,000
INLAND VALLEY HOPE PARTNERS$500
OUR SAVIOUR CENTER$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PEPPERMINT RIDGE: $500 → 11%FOOTHILL FAMILY: $500 → 14%FOOTHILL FAMILY: $500 → 14%ABILITYFIRST: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$56k · 16 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
15

Total granted

$56k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+2%

Still filing today

31%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    Flintridge Center
    3× · 2021–2023 · $11k · revenue +50%
  • DO
    DAY ONE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +70%
  • GP
    GOD PROVIDES MINISTRY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • PC
    PASADENA COMMUNITY COALITION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • TG
    THE GOODEN CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +2%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL
    one grant, 2021 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Fid Group Friends in Deed

The fid group is a not-for-profit that delivers social services to people in the greater pasadena area who are experiencing homelessness, food vulnerabilities, and poverty.

Religion
2
Family Promise of San Gabriel Valley

To help families challenged with homelessness and low income achieve sustainable independence through a community-based approach.

Human Services
3
Pasadena Community Ministries Inc

City food pantry

Human Services
4
Candela Group

The mission of the Candela Group is to bring stability and an improved quality of life to our clients and their loved ones affected by mental illness by uniting them with public and private mental health services Our lived experience as…

Health
5
Oxnard Homeless Prevntion
Human Services
6
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
7
Family Promise of Sacramento

To provide temporary shelter and assistance to homeless families, and also to provide rental assistance in an effort to prevent families from becoming homeless. Program goal is to assist the families in their efforts to become…

Education
8
Dorothys Daugther

We enhance the lives of individuals in our community especially our youth and seniors. We focus on building strong relationships and providing essential support services that foster personal growth and community well-being. We primarily…

Human Services
9
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

10
Open Arms Food Pantry & Resource Center

Our mission is to provide nutritional meal and food support, food equity programming to local communities and provide infant needs to eradicate infant mortality and abuse rates in LA County and City.

Food & Nutrition
11
Wayfinder Family Services

The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…

Human Services
12
Positive Outlook Housing Corp

General upkeep of facility for housing

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foothill Family Service and the most unlike its peers is God Provides Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PASADENA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $10,500 · OtherPASADENA CHAMBER OF COMMERCEDAY ONE — $10,000 · OtherDAY ONEEL MONTE POLICE DEPT — $6,000 · OtherEL MONTE POLICE DEPTELIZABETH HOUSE — $5,500 · OtherELIZABETH HOUSEPASADENA COMMUNITY COALITION — $2,500 · OtherDORRIS DANN KIDS CAMPUS — $2,000 · OtherDORIS DANN KIDS CAMPUS — $2,000 · Other+15 more — $12,500 · Other+15 moreFlintridge Center — $10,500 · PhilanthropyFlintridge CenterPASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $500 · PhilanthropyCORONA NORCO UNITED WAY — $500 · PhilanthropyPasadena Community Foundation — $500 · PhilanthropyTHE GOODEN CENTER — $1,500 · HealthDESTROY DUCHENNE — $500 · HealthFoothill Family Service — $1,000 · Human ServicesABILITYFIRST — $500 · Human ServicesPEPPERMINT RIDGE — $500 · Human ServicesGOD PROVIDES MINISTRY — $1,000 · Food & NutritionPOMONA HOPE — $1,000 · Education
Other$51,000Philanthropy$12,000Health$2,000Human Services$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Education$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFlintridge Center — $10,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDAY ONE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GOODEN CENTER — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoothill Family Service — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOD PROVIDES MINISTRY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOMONA HOPE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPasadena Police Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCORONA-NORCO SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORONA NORCO UNITED WAY — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPasadena Community Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABILITYFIRST — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESTROY DUCHENNE — $500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCorona Chamber of Commerce — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEPPERMINT RIDGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Flintridge Center
  • Who funds DAY ONE
  • Who funds THE GOODEN CENTER
  • Who funds Foothill Family Service
  • Who funds GOD PROVIDES MINISTRY
  • Who funds POMONA HOPE
  • Who funds Pasadena Police Foundation
  • Who funds CORONA-NORCO SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC
  • Who funds PASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CORONA NORCO UNITED WAY
  • Who funds Pasadena Community Foundation
  • Who funds ABILITYFIRST
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE
  • Who funds DESTROY DUCHENNE
  • Who funds Corona Chamber of Commerce
  • Who funds PEPPERMINT RIDGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization New Discovery Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph