Skip to content
Neudorfer Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Neudorfer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$59kHealth$49kHuman Services$22kPublic Benefit$21kYouth Development$10kArts & Culture$9kFood & Nutrition$7kSocial Science$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$622k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY ROSARY CHURCH$10,000
WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER$5,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$2,500
USO NORTHWEST$2,500
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER$2,500
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$2,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$2,000
WHIDBEY ISLAND CENTER FOR THE ARTS$1,174
ST JUDE HOSPITAL$1,000
LEUKEMIA SOCIETY$1,000
BENAROYA INSTITUTE$1,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS$1,000
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH$1,000
WEST SEATTLE FOOD BANK$1,000
SUSAN G KOMAN FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDRENS CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $1k → 11%SHRINERS HOSPITALS: $1k → 13%ST JUDE HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%WHIDBEY ISLAND CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $1k → 7%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB KING COUNTY: $1k → 9%SHRINERS HOSPITALS: $1k → 13%ST JUDE HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB KING COUNTY: $1k → 9%SKAGIT LAND TRUST: $1k → 11%SHRINERS HOSPITALS: $1k → 13%ST JUDE HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%BENAROYA INSTITUTE: $1k → 9%SKAGIT LAND TRUST: $1k → 11%SHRINERS HOSPITALS: $1k → 13%ST JUDE HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%BENAROYA INSTITUTE: $1k → 9%SKAGIT LAND TRUST: $1k → 11%SHRINERS HOSPITALS: $1k → 13%ST JUDE HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH: $1k → 9%SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%SHRINERS HOSPITALS: $1k → 13%ST JUDE HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $1k → 9%SKAGIT LAND TRUST: $1k → 11%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%BENAROYA INSTITUTE: $1k → 9%SKAGIT LAND TRUST: $1k → 11%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 9%HOLY ROSARY CHURCH: $12k → 9%HOLY ROSARY CHURCH: $11k → 9%HOLY ROSARY CHURCH: $10k → 9%HOLY ROSARY CHURCH: $10k → 9%HOLY ROSARY CHURCH: $8k → 9%HOLY ROSARY CHURCH: $8k → 9%VARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS TO CHARITIE: $3k → 9%VARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS TO CHARITIE: $2k → 9%VARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS TO CHARITIE: $1k → 9%VARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS TO CHARITIE: $1k → 9%USO NORTHWEST: $3k → 9%USO NORTHWEST: $1k → 9%USO NORTHWEST: $1k → 9%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER: $3k → 9%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 9%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $2k → 9%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$201k · 28 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
3

Total granted

$201k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+31%

Still filing today

32%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureCivil RightsEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +54%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +53%
  • FH
    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
    5× · 2021–2025 · $7k · revenue +169%

Funded once

  • SC
    SKAGIT COUNTY SEARCH RESCUE
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue -17%
  • VT
    VILLAGE THEATREgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Swedish Health Services

To improve the health and well-being of each person we serve.

Health
3
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
4
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
5
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
6
Washington State Academy of Sciences

WSAS provides expert scientific and engineering assessments to inform public policy making and works to increase the impact of research in Washington State.

Science & Tech
7
Pacific Science Center Foundation

Pacific science center (pacsci) ignites curiosity in every child and fuels a passion for discovery, experimentation, and critical thinking in all of us.

Arts & Culture
8
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
9
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
10
Uw Physicians Network

To improve the health of the public.

Education
11
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
12
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Alaska & Washington; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY ROSARY CHURCH: $57,775 · OtherHOLY ROSARY CHURCHVARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS TO CHARITIE: $8,896 · OtherVARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS TO CHARITIEUSO NORTHWEST: $7,559 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $7,500 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $6,500 · OtherST JUDE HOSPITAL: $6,000 · OtherBENAROYA INSTITUTE: $6,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALS: $6,000 · OtherLEUKEMIA SOCIETY: $6,000 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · Other+9 more: $18,455 · Other+9 moreWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER: $21,000 · Civil RightsWASHINGTON …MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON: $8,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WIS…Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $6,500 · HealthFred Hutch…American Diabetes Association: $2,000 · HealthAmerican D…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,500 · HealthAMERICAN C…+1 more: $500 · HealthWest Seattle Food Bank: $6,000 · Food & NutritionWHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES: $500 · Food & NutritionSKAGIT LAND TRUST: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $1,150 · PhilanthropyWHIDBEY ISLAND CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $1,174 · Arts & CultureVILLAGE THEATRE: $500 · Arts & CultureKINGS WAY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $1,500 · Education
Other$149,685Civil Rights$21,000Health$18,500Food & Nutrition$6,500Environment$5,000Philanthropy$3,150Arts & Culture$1,674Education$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER: $21,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWest Seattle Food Bank: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSKAGIT LAND TRUST: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKINGS WAY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHIDBEY ISLAND CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $1,174 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $1,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE THEATRE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds West Seattle Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SKAGIT LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds KINGS WAY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WHIDBEY ISLAND CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
  • Who funds WHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE THEATRE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…Mightycause Charitabl…United Way of King Co…M J Murdock Charitabl…Shell USA Company Fou…Baird Foundation IncThe Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…American Endowment Fo…
Seattle FoundationWA22.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · United Way of King County · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neudorfer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neudorfer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neudorfer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home