· Private foundation
Neudorfer Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k25 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOLY ROSARY CHURCH | $10,000 |
| WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER | $5,000 |
| MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER | $2,500 |
| USO NORTHWEST | $2,500 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $2,000 |
| CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES | $2,000 |
| WHIDBEY ISLAND CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $1,174 |
| BENAROYA INSTITUTE | $1,000 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITALS | $1,000 |
| ST JUDE HOSPITAL | $1,000 |
| WEST SEATTLE FOOD BANK | $1,000 |
| SUSAN G KOMAN FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| TOYS FOR TOTS | $1,000 |
| NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WPWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER5× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +54%
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +53%
- FHFred Hutchinson Cancer Center5× · 2021–2025 · $7k · revenue +169%
Funded once
- SCSKAGIT COUNTY SEARCH RESCUEone grant, 2021 · $1k
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INCone grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue -17%- VTVILLAGE THEATREgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
To improve the health and well-being of each person we serve.
Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…
To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
WSAS provides expert scientific and engineering assessments to inform public policy making and works to increase the impact of research in Washington State.
Pacific science center (pacsci) ignites curiosity in every child and fuels a passion for discovery, experimentation, and critical thinking in all of us.
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
To improve the health of the public.
We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…
The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Alaska & Washington and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
- Who funds West Seattle Food Bank ↗
- Who funds SKAGIT LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE SKAGIT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds KINGS WAY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WHIDBEY ISLAND CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
- Who funds WHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE THEATRE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · United Way of King County · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Neudorfer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.