Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nelson & Debbie Fox Charitable Fdtn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$257kFood & Nutrition$199kHousing & Shelter$30k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $81k
$8,125
Median grant
1
States reached
$311k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC$40,000
PANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE$18,000
HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER$12,500
LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR$10,375
MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION$8,125
4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK$6,250
SOUTH PLAINS SPCA$6,250
SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK$2,500
806 K9S$2,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%REEDS RANCH RESCUE: $2k → 15%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $3k → 17%CHERISHED PETS ANIMAL RESCUE: $2k → 18%FRIENDS OF BROWNFIELD ANIMAL SHELTER: $2k → 21%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $7k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $3k → 17%CHERISHED PETS ANIMAL RESCUE: $1k → 18%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $7k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $3k → 17%806 K9S: $2k → 21%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $3k → 17%806 K9S: $2k → 21%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $4k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%806 K9S: $2k → 21%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%806 K9S: $2k → 21%LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR: $10k → 17%LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR: $7k → 17%LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR: $7k → 17%LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR: $5k → 17%SOUTH PLAINS SPCA: $6k → 17%SOUTH PLAINS SPCA: $6k → 17%DUSTY POODLES DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $5k → 17%SOUTH PLAINS SPCA: $5k → 17%DUSTY POODLES DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $4k → 17%DUSTY POODLES DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $4k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $40k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $30k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $30k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $29k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $29k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $27k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $6k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $6k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $5k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $5k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $4k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $4k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $13k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $11k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $10k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $10k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $8k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$486k · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$486k
$0

Still filing today

62%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $88k · revenue +67%
  • HA
    HAVEN ANIMAL CARE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +0%
  • MS
    MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +5%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Love and Puppy Paws Dog Rescue

    Love And Puppy Paws Dog Rescue (LAPP Dog Rescue) was formed to help alleviate the stress of city and county animal control facilities around South and Central Texas. We accept dogs into our rescue that are in overpopulated animal control…

    Animals
    2
    Lone Star Transport Dogs

    Lone Star Transport Dogs is committed to saving the homeless, abused, and unwanted dogs in East Texas. LSTD rescues, rehabilitates, loves, and cares for Texas dogs until they are ready for adoption. Our dogs then make the journey to our…

    Animals
    3
    Friends of Texas Panhandle Shelter Pets

    Friends of Texas Panhandle Shelter Pets is a placement and transport rescue that works with small town panhandle shelters to help animals who are at risk of euthanasia get to rescues where they are adopted and loved.Our volunteers work…

    Animals
    4
    Hope Fur Paws Rescue

    To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

    Animals
    5
    Pets Without Partners

    Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

    Animals
    6
    Second Chance Dog Rescue

    Our mission at Second Chance Dog Rescue is to care for companion animals in need byoffering safe refuge, providing medical care (including sterilization) and facilitating adoptions.

    Animals
    7
    St Clouds Rescue
    Animals
    8
    Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc

    Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc rescues dogs and cats from southern state kill shelters and off the streets to save them being euthanized. We also help contract by the pet population by spaying and neutering and educating the public on…

    Animals
    9
    Throw a Dog a Bone Dog Rescue

    Throw a Dog a Bone is an all-breed dog rescue located in Austin, TX. We focus on saving dogs primarily in the rural shelters in South Texas. Many of these shelters have no exposure and very few resources. Our mission is to rescue as many…

    Animals
    10
    Barking Mad Animal Rescue

    Rescue abused & abandoned dogs, urgent at risk of euthanasia dogs, medical needs & hospice dogs to provide veterinary care, rehabilitation, and find homes for dogs that become adoptable. Sanctuary til end of life is provided for those not…

    Animals
    11
    Lifeline for Pets Inc

    Rescue, care for, rehome abandoned, stray, relinquished cats and dogs.

    Animals
    12
    West Houston Animal Rescue

    Rescue dogs and other small domestic animals, care for them until they are healthy and adopt them to loving families.

    Animals
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 806 K9S; the most unlike its peers is Lubbock Open Door. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/9
    Grantees still filing
    6/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $185,625 · Food & NutritionLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INCSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $13,813 · Food & NutritionSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INCPANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE: $87,688 · AnimalsPANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPEHAVEN ANIMAL CARE INC: $60,000 · AnimalsHAVEN ANIMAL CARE INCMORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $33,687 · AnimalsMORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATIONSouth Plains SPCA: $16,875 · AnimalsSouth Plains SPCA4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $29,999 · Other4 LEGGED FRIE…DUSTY POODLES DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $13,126 · OtherDUSTY POODLES…806 K9S: $8,500 · Other806 K9SCHERISHED PETS ANIMAL RESCUE: $3,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF BROWNFIELD ANIMAL SHELTER: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherLUBBOCK OPEN DOOR: $29,937 · Religion
    Food & Nutrition$199,438Animals$198,250Other$58,625Religion$29,937

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $185,625 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE: $87,688 over 6y, 16% of budgetHAVEN ANIMAL CARE INC: $60,000 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetMORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $33,687 over 6y, 7.1% of budget4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $29,999 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetLUBBOCK OPEN DOOR: $29,937 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSouth Plains SPCA: $16,875 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $13,813 over 6y, 0.0% of budget806 K9S: $8,500 over 4y, 3.8% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
    • Who funds PANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE ↗
    • Who funds HAVEN ANIMAL CARE INC ↗
    • Who funds MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds 4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK ↗
    • Who funds LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR ↗
    • Who funds South Plains SPCA ↗
    • Who funds SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC ↗
    • Who funds 806 K9S ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Community Foundation of West TexasTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Community Foundation of West Texas · Xcel Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Nelson & Debbie Fox Charitable Fdtn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nelson & Debbie Fox Charitable Fdtn. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Nelson & Debbie Fox Charitable Fdtn’s filings →

      More from the funding graph