Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nelson & Debbie Fox Charitable Fdtn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Animals$257kFood & Nutrition$199kHousing & Shelter$30k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $81k
$8,125
Median grant
1
States reached
$311k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC$40,000
PANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE$18,000
HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER$12,500
LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR$10,375
MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION$8,125
4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK$6,250
SOUTH PLAINS SPCA$6,250
SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK$2,500
806 K9S$2,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%REEDS RANCH RESCUE: $2k → 15%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $3k → 17%CHERISHED PETS ANIMAL RESCUE: $2k → 18%FRIENDS OF BROWNFIELD ANIMAL SHELTER: $2k → 21%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $7k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $3k → 17%CHERISHED PETS ANIMAL RESCUE: $1k → 18%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $7k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $3k → 17%806 K9S: $2k → 21%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $3k → 17%806 K9S: $2k → 21%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $4k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%806 K9S: $2k → 21%MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $2k → 17%806 K9S: $2k → 21%LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR: $10k → 17%LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR: $7k → 17%LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR: $7k → 17%LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR: $5k → 17%SOUTH PLAINS SPCA: $6k → 17%SOUTH PLAINS SPCA: $6k → 17%DUSTY POODLES DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $5k → 17%SOUTH PLAINS SPCA: $5k → 17%DUSTY POODLES DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $4k → 17%DUSTY POODLES DACHSHUND RESCUE INC: $4k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $40k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $30k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $30k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $29k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $29k → 17%LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $27k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $6k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $6k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $5k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $5k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $4k → 17%4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK: $4k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $13k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $11k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $10k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $10k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $8k → 17%HAVEN ANIMAL CARE SHELTER: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$486k · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$486k
$0

Still filing today

62%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $88k · revenue +67%
  • HA
    HAVEN ANIMAL CARE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +0%
  • MS
    MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +5%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Love and Puppy Paws Dog Rescue

    Love And Puppy Paws Dog Rescue (LAPP Dog Rescue) was formed to help alleviate the stress of city and county animal control facilities around South and Central Texas. We accept dogs into our rescue that are in overpopulated animal control…

    Animals
    2
    Lone Star Transport Dogs

    Lone Star Transport Dogs is committed to saving the homeless, abused, and unwanted dogs in East Texas. LSTD rescues, rehabilitates, loves, and cares for Texas dogs until they are ready for adoption. Our dogs then make the journey to our…

    Animals
    3
    Friends of Texas Panhandle Shelter Pets

    Friends of Texas Panhandle Shelter Pets is a placement and transport rescue that works with small town panhandle shelters to help animals who are at risk of euthanasia get to rescues where they are adopted and loved.Our volunteers work…

    Animals
    4
    Hope Fur Paws Rescue

    To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

    Animals
    5
    Pets Without Partners

    Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

    Animals
    6
    Second Chance Dog Rescue

    Our mission at Second Chance Dog Rescue is to care for companion animals in need byoffering safe refuge, providing medical care (including sterilization) and facilitating adoptions.

    Animals
    7
    St Clouds Rescue
    Animals
    8
    Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc

    Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc rescues dogs and cats from southern state kill shelters and off the streets to save them being euthanized. We also help contract by the pet population by spaying and neutering and educating the public on…

    Animals
    9
    Throw a Dog a Bone Dog Rescue

    Throw a Dog a Bone is an all-breed dog rescue located in Austin, TX. We focus on saving dogs primarily in the rural shelters in South Texas. Many of these shelters have no exposure and very few resources. Our mission is to rescue as many…

    Animals
    10
    Barking Mad Animal Rescue

    Rescue abused & abandoned dogs, urgent at risk of euthanasia dogs, medical needs & hospice dogs to provide veterinary care, rehabilitation, and find homes for dogs that become adoptable. Sanctuary til end of life is provided for those not…

    Animals
    11
    Lifeline for Pets Inc

    Rescue, care for, rehome abandoned, stray, relinquished cats and dogs.

    Animals
    12
    West Houston Animal Rescue

    Rescue dogs and other small domestic animals, care for them until they are healthy and adopt them to loving families.

    Animals

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 806 K9S and the most unlike its peers is Lubbock Open Door. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/9
    Grantees still filing
    6/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $185,625 · Food & NutritionLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INCSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $13,813 · Food & NutritionSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INCPANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE — $87,688 · AnimalsPANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPEHAVEN ANIMAL CARE INC — $60,000 · AnimalsHAVEN ANIMAL CARE INCMORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION — $33,687 · AnimalsMORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATIONSouth Plains SPCA — $16,875 · AnimalsSouth Plains SPCA4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK — $29,999 · Other4 LEGGED FRIE…DUSTY POODLES DACHSHUND RESCUE INC — $13,126 · OtherDUSTY POODLES…806 K9S — $8,500 · Other806 K9SCHERISHED PETS ANIMAL RESCUE — $3,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF BROWNFIELD ANIMAL SHELTER — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherLUBBOCK OPEN DOOR — $29,937 · Religion
    Food & Nutrition$199,438Animals$198,250Other$58,625Religion$29,937

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $185,625 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE — $87,688 over 6y, 16% of budgetHAVEN ANIMAL CARE INC — $60,000 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetMORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION — $33,687 over 6y, 7.1% of budget4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK — $29,999 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetLUBBOCK OPEN DOOR — $29,937 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSouth Plains SPCA — $16,875 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $13,813 over 6y, 0.0% of budget806 K9S — $8,500 over 4y, 3.8% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    • Who funds PANHANDLE PAWS OF HOPE
    • Who funds HAVEN ANIMAL CARE INC
    • Who funds MORRIS SAFE HOUSE FOUNDATION
    • Who funds 4 LEGGED FRIENDS LBK
    • Who funds LUBBOCK OPEN DOOR
    • Who funds South Plains SPCA
    • Who funds SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
    • Who funds 806 K9S

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Community Foundation of West TexasTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Community Foundation of West Texas · Xcel Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Nelson & Debbie Fox Charitable Fdtn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph