Skip to content

· Private foundation

Neal Martin Christensen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$331k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$495kHealth$449kReligion$302kEducation$293kFood & Nutrition$175kHuman Services$145kCrime & Legal$116kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $191k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEAN B PURVIS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$75,000
WHITE RIVER CRAFT CENTER$50,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$45,000
VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER$36,000
WQED$30,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
HIS KIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$20,000
ROBIN'S HOME$20,000
EVOLVE COACHING$10,000
BC3 EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
BUTLER AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY$6,000
ST LUKES EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,000
THE BUTLER ART CENTER$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $261k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SWING FOR THE TROOPS: $20k → 11%SWING FOR THE TROOPS: $20k → 11%EVOLVE COACHING: $45k → 11%EVOLVE COACHING: $10k → 11%EVOLVE COACHING: $10k → 11%EVOLVE COACHING: $10k → 11%EVOLVE COACHING: $10k → 11%EVOLVE COACHING: $10k → 11%VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER: $36k → 9%VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER: $20k → 9%VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER: $20k → 9%VOICE: $10k → 9%YMCA: $10k → 9%Voice: $10k → 9%VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER: $10k → 9%VOICE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 22 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$2.0M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+44%

Still filing today

59%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsAnimalsFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    White River Craft Center Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $355k · revenue +108% · 59% of their budget
  • CH
    Community Health Clinic of Butler County Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $286k · revenue +38%
  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $175k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • FH
    FAMILY HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +44%
  • YO
    YMCA OF THE ROSESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +60%
  • DP
    DOLLY PARTON'S IMAGINATION LIBRARY KNOCH
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Butler County Federated Library System

Public library services

Education
2
South Butler Community Library

Identify, prioritize, provide and continually improve services, educational, self-improvement, leisure opportunities, literary materials, facilities, professional, voluntary and charitable leadership and support.

Education
3
Wetzel County Center for Children and Families Inc

Provide programs and services that support & strengthen Wetzel County famiilies thru interagency coordination, collaboration and communication. communication.

Human Services
4
Butler County Humane Society
Animals
5
Butler Valley Inc

Provides day care and twenty-four hour live-in facilities for developmental disabled adults.

Health
6
Bridge of Hope Buxmont

Provides assistance to single mothers with dependent children experiencing homelessness or at-risk of homelessness in bucks and montgomery counties in pennsylvania.

—
7
Valley Community Library

Public lending library

—
8
Warren Library Association

The mission of the warren library association is to provide all citizens in its service area access to library materials and information services which address the needs and expand the aspirations of the community for formal and lifelong…

—
9
The Regional Opportunity Center D/B/a Vibrant Pittsburgh

Vibrant pittsburgh's mission is to accelerate the business community toward equitable, inclusive, and diverse workplaces, creating a future-forward region.

Arts & Culture
10
Community Library of Allegheny Valley

The Library is a center for informational resources and services, promoting literacy and lifelong learning. The Library has achieved the status of Family Place Library, a national initiative to encourage the beginning stages of literacy in…

—
11
Wrc Senior Services

Wrc senior services provides choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and rehabilitative health care.

—
12
Pittsylvania County Community Action Inc

To increase awareness about poverty and to promote comprehensive approaches to eliminate conditions that cause poverty and improve the quality of life in communities throughout the service area.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of Butler County; the most unlike its peers is Swing for the Troops. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
16/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUMMIT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $270,000 · OtherSUMMIT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHHIS KIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $60,000 · OtherHIS KIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE BLIND ASSOCIATION: $57,000 · OtherTHE BLIND ASSOCIATIONBUTLER AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $35,840 · OtherBC3 EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherST LUKES EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · OtherReading Ready Pittsburgh: $30,000 · OtherBUTLER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,000 · Other+9 more: $92,022 · Other+9 moreCommunity Health Clinic of Butler County Inc: $286,135 · HealthCommunity Health Clin…THE ARC OF BUTLER COUNTY: $100,753 · HealthTHE ARC OF BUTLER COU…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthWhite River Craft Center Inc: $355,000 · Recreation & SportsWhite River Craft C…VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER: $116,000 · Human ServicesVICTIM OUTREAC…EVOLVE COACHING INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesEVOLVE COACHIN…SWING FOR THE TROOPS: $40,000 · Human ServicesSWING FOR THE …YMCA OF THE ROSES: $10,000 · Human ServicesGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $175,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER P…WQED MULTIMEDIA: $100,000 · Arts & CultureRobins Home Inc: $40,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$724,862Health$396,888Recreation & Sports$355,000Human Services$261,000Food & Nutrition$175,000Arts & Culture$100,000Housing & Shelter$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWhite River Craft Center Inc: $355,000 over 7y, 59% of budgetCommunity Health Clinic of Butler County Inc: $286,135 over 6y, 11% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $175,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER: $116,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ARC OF BUTLER COUNTY: $100,753 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA: $100,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEVOLVE COACHING INC: $95,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetSWING FOR THE TROOPS: $40,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetRobins Home Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetBUTLER AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $35,840 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetReading Ready Pittsburgh: $30,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetBUTLER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGolden Tornado Scholastic Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds White River Craft Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Community Health Clinic of Butler County Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds VICTIM OUTREACH INTERVENTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF BUTLER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds WQED MULTIMEDIA ↗
  • Who funds EVOLVE COACHING INC ↗
  • Who funds SWING FOR THE TROOPS ↗
  • Who funds Robins Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds BUTLER AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Reading Ready Pittsburgh ↗
  • Who funds BUTLER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE ROSES ↗
  • Who funds Golden Tornado Scholastic Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA20.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Butler County Bar Association Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neal Martin Christensen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neal Martin Christensen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neal Martin Christensen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph