· Private foundation
Nc & Bc Foundation Inc Co Richard Terris Cpa
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $3,604 |
| DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE | $3,045 |
| DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING AR | $3,000 |
| COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION | $2,760 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION COLORADO CH | $2,046 |
| CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $2,040 |
| HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION | $2,037 |
| DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| SAGEUSAORG | $1,571 |
| DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE SCIENCE | $1,552 |
| CENTRAL PARK CONSERVATORY | $1,500 |
| BROADWAYCARESORG | $1,038 |
| AIRLINK INC | $1,036 |
| VISITING NURSE SERVICES | $1,030 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FBFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES6× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +74%
- DADENVER ART MUSEUM3× · 2017–2021 · $13k · revenue +7%
DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS5× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +64%
Funded once
- ANAMERICAN NEUROTOLOGY SOCIETYone grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +14% · 26% of their budget
- LULYNN UNIVERSITY INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +34%
- AMAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRINGgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +103%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…
To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).
The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is JoAnn B Ficke Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN NEUROTOLOGY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds LYNN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds AIRLINK INC ↗
- Who funds THE MAXFUND INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN OF BELLEVUE INC ↗
- Who funds JoAnn B Ficke Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalit ↗
- Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nc & Bc Foundation Inc Co Richard Terris Cpa funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Champlain College Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Lynn University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nc & Bc Foundation Inc Co Richard Terris Cpa?
Find your warmest path to Nc & Bc Foundation Inc Co Richard Terris Cpa through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.