Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Nazarene Compassionate Ministries Inc

To respond to and prevent human suffering resulting from poverty and disaster.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$356kFood & Nutrition$154kYouth Development$152kEducation$92kReligion$20kScience & Tech$6k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $37,005 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,030,331 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $993,326 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
$5,844
Median grant
3
States reached
$805k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAWN GROVE COMPASSION CENTER$29,054
CALIFORNIA MOBILITY CENTER SACRAMENTO$5,844
CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE INC$2,107
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $146k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%OROVILLE HOPE CENTER: $8k → 18%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $60k → 16%XZONE: $71k → 7%OROVILLE HOPE CENTER: $7k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IN
OH
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN

Grants abroad, by region — $704k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Russia and Neighboring States$536k · 76% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN AID

South Asia$100k · 14% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN AID

Sub-Saharan Africa$58k · 8% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN AID

North America (Canada and Mexico)$10k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN AID

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$296k · 3 repeat orgs$330k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$296k
$324k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-55%
+119%

Still filing today

33%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $177k
  • FG
    FAWN GROVE COMPASSION CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $104k
  • OH
    Oroville Hope Center
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue -55%

Funded once

  • CI
    CROSSBRIDGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $92k · revenue +249%
  • PB
    PF Bresee Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $81k · revenue +60%
  • XC
    XZONE COMMUNITY CENTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $71k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Hope Center Inc

The Hope Center is a faith-based organization designed to assist low income individuals and families who live in Bakersfield, California to move towards wholeness, physically, emotionally and spiritually by distributing food, clothing and…

Human Services
2
Ministry Center

We build bridges between people experiencing the immediate effects of poverty and homelessness to the physical and spiritual resources available to alleviate suffering and facilitate long term transformation.

Human Services
3
Bridge of Hope Ministries

Transforming lives in the Ville through access to supportive services and efficacy.

Religion
4
House of Hope Midwest

The House of Hope is dedicated to serving individuals, families, and our community by providing a hand up into a hope-filled future.

Human Services
5
Coalition of Care Greater Cincinnati

Coalition of Care of Greater Cincinnati exists to mobilize churches and to inspire volunteers to care for vulnerable children and fragile families.

Youth Development
6
Compassion Corps

Compassion Corps is engaged in mobilizing others to carry hope relief and opportunity into regions of Africa plagued by fear and despair through partnership with indigenous Africans in their holistic efforts of compassion.

International
7
Hope Center Inc

The Hope Center seeks out and teams with volunteers from congregations of many faiths.The Center is committed to serving people in need in Waukesha County, Wisconsin through financial assistance, food, child care, clothing and…

8
Crisis Ministries

To assist individuals and families who are struggling financially by offering help for today and hope for tomorrow.

Religion
9
Hope-Net

The Organizaton was formed to address the hunger and homeless needs of poverty stricken families of the community through the distribution of food, clothing and shelter. Additionally, it develops, owns and operates a 17 unit apartment…

Food & Nutrition
10
North Coast Christian Ministries Inc Dba Hope for San Diego

Hope for San Diego raises awareness, engages volunteers and provides financial and other tangible resources to organizations serving the poor and marginalized in the greater San Diego area.

Human Services
11
Crossover Ministries Inc

The goal of crossover ministries is to educate young girls and boys and be proactive before they enter a lifestyle of human trafficking and prostitution by teaching them life skills, english, and the love of jesus.

Religion
12
Northwest Childrens Outreach

Provide infant supplies and clothing to people in need in the greater portland oregon and southwest washington metro area.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is The Lotridge Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE INC — $177,029 · OtherCHURCH OF THE NAZARENE INCFAWN GROVE COMPASSION CENTER — $104,145 · OtherFAWN GROVE COMPASSION CENTERPF Bresee Foundation — $81,123 · OtherPF Bresee FoundationLOWER LIGHT MINISTRIES INC — $20,067 · Other+1 more — $5,844 · OtherCONVOY OF HOPE — $154,224 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPEXZONE COMMUNITY CENTERS INC — $70,802 · Human ServicesXZONE COMMUNITY CENTE…Shepherd Community Inc — $60,414 · Human ServicesShepherd Community In…Oroville Hope Center — $14,720 · Human ServicesOroville Hope CenterCROSSBRIDGE INC — $92,030 · EducationCROSSBRIDGE I…
Other$388,208International$154,224Human Services$145,936Education$92,030

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCROSSBRIDGE INC — $92,030 over 1y, 13% of budgetPF Bresee Foundation — $81,123 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetShepherd Community Inc — $60,414 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLOWER LIGHT MINISTRIES INC — $20,067 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetOroville Hope Center — $14,720 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCalifornia Mobility Center — $5,844 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nazarene Compassionate Ministries Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nazarene Compassionate Ministries Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Nazarene Compassionate Ministries Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph