Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc

Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and serve nps' military students and alumni.

$344k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$496kHuman Services$338kArts & Culture$160kHousing & Shelter$84kPublic Benefit$18kYouth Development$13k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $7,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $343,758 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $336,258 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PANETTA INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $51k → 7%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $21k → 7%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $19k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 8 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$1.0M
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+89%

Still filing today

88%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’25
Public BenefitHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $160k · revenue +17%
  • WC
    WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $91k · revenue +71%
  • TS
    THE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST
    2× · 2018–2021 · $86k · revenue +160%

Funded once

  • TU
    THANKS USA
    one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue -65%
  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +89%
  • US
    UNITED STATES TREASURY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Operators Transition Foundation Inc

The special operators transition foundation ("sotf") assists special operation forces veterans transition from the military into their next successful career.

Public Benefit
2
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
3
The Honor Foundation Inc

Assists u.s. special operation forces transition from active duty military to private sector careers.

Employment
4
Special Ops Survivors

Special ops survivors advances the mission "to embrace and empower surviving spouses of fallen special operations heroes to build healthy post-loss futures as they transition and rebuild their new lives." the foundation provides programs…

Human Services
5
Usvets - Texas

The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
6
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
7
For Veterans Sake Foundation

For veteran's sake foundation is here to provide an alternative solution to dealing with pts (post traumatic stress). we use a combination of a (non-therapeutic) neuro-traumatic resourcing, service dogs and consulting. working with the…

Health
8
The Veterans and First Responders
Human Services
9
Special Operations Warrior Foundation

To ensure comprehensive educational support including, but not limited to, academic advocacy, preschool and private school grants, tutoring, support for students with disabilities, college readiness programs, full financial assistance for…

Education
10
Military Officers Association of America

Preserve and protect earned benefits for our uniformed services, veterans, their families, and surviving spouses through advocacy, leadership, education and service. provide first-class service to our members. we are the leading voice on…

Public Benefit
11
Warrior Reunion Foundation

Supports combat veterans in overcoming the challenges of post-military transition by reconnecting those who served together overseas through the execution of recovery reunions.

Public Benefit
12
The Punta Brava Foundation Inc

To assist military personnel, such as the Navy SEALs, with the transition from the military to civilian life by providing resources to support their physical, emotional, and financial well-being.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homes for Our Troops Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL — $469,500 · OtherNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL+4 more — $39,573 · Other+4 moreNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $159,885 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDA…VETERANS TRANSITION CENTER OF CALIFORNIA — $67,671 · Public BenefitVETERANS TRAN…A Sanctuary for Military Families Inc DBA Project Sanctuary — $60,749 · Public BenefitA Sanctuary f…TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC — $61,376 · HealthTRAGEDY AS…SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $38,376 · HealthSEMPER FI …THE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST — $86,429 · PhilanthropyTHE SPECI…The Morse Foundation — $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe Morse…WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC — $91,110 · Human ServicesWARRIOR C…HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $16,401 · Housing & ShelterThe Panetta Institute for Public Policy — $7,500 · Education
Other$509,073Arts & Culture$159,885Public Benefit$128,420Health$99,752Philanthropy$96,429Human Services$91,110Housing & Shelter$16,401Education$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $159,885 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC — $91,110 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST — $86,429 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetVETERANS TRANSITION CENTER OF CALIFORNIA — $67,671 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC — $61,376 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetA Sanctuary for Military Families Inc DBA Project Sanctuary — $60,749 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $38,376 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHANKS USA — $16,863 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $16,401 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Morse Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph