Skip to content
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends.

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
116
Grants FY2025still arriving
31
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$45MCommunity Improvement$16MCivil Rights$3.9MPublic Benefit$2.1MHousing & Shelter$1.8MEducation$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.2MHealth$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 116 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 116 grants below total $5,315,665, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,515,997 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,200,332 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k86 grants · $1.5M
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.4M
$17,250
Median grant
31
States reached
$657M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NRDC ACTION FUND INC$2,000,000
COMING CLEAN INC$400,000
THE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT INC$153,000
DOGWOOD ALLIANCE$151,400
COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT$100,000
CENTER FOR EARTH ENERGY AND DEMOCRACY$100,000
WESTERN RESOURCE ADVOCATES$80,000
WINDWARD FUND$75,000
WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS$75,000
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS$69,300
NW ENERGY COALITION$62,500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$60,000
UNITED TRIBES OF BRISTOL BAY$60,000
THE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR DIALOGUE AND PEACEBUILDING$60,000
CENTRAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$58,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE NEW SUN RISING: $10k → 11%Sustainable Silicon Valley: $15k → 8%LA COSECHA CSA: $60k → 14%PEE DEE INDIAN TRIBE: $15k → 30%BLACK AUTONOMY NETWORK COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $33k → 15%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING COMMUNITIES: $20k → 17%HARAMBEE HOUSE INC: $35k → 16%OHIO PARTNERS FOR AFFORDABLE ENERGY: $40k → 9%MICAH SIX EIGHT MISSION: $50k → 17%VALLEY VERDE: $10k → 8%LA COSECHA CSA: $40k → 14%BLACK AUTONOMY NETWORK COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $23k → 15%La Cosecha CSA: $13k → 14%BLACK AUTONOMY COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $15k → 15%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING COMMUNITIES: $12k → 17%Soulside Healing Arts: $8k → 14%LA COSECHA CSA: $12k → 14%BLACK AUTONOMY COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $7k → 15%METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS EQUAL HOUSING AND OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $10k → 21%EL PUEBLO: $25k → 8%LA COSECHA CSA: $10k → 14%Tri-County Urban League: $100k → 14%La Cosecha CSA: $10k → 14%WOMEN OF RENEWABLE INDUSTRIES AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY: $8k → 20%NAEVA: $75k → 14%BROWN GIRL WELLNESS INC: $10k → 19%We the People of Detroit: $25k → 21%HEAVEN'S VIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $83k → 14%COLORADO PEOPLES ALLIANCE: $30k → 12%HEAVEN'S VIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $68k → 14%Colorado Peoples Alliance: $25k → 12%Colorado Peoples Alliance: $15k → 12%HEAVEN'S VIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15k → 14%Sun Valley Community Center: $10k → 12%SOUTHEAST ASIAN MAA COALITION INC: $9k → 22%Jewish Family Service of Colorado Inc: $10k → 12%Latino Community Foundation: $10k → 10%Latino Community Foundation: $9k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $220k → 10%The Gathering for Justice: $150k → 17%STRATEGIC CONCEPTS IN ORGANIZING AND POLICY EDUCATION: $20k → 14%STRATEGIC CONCEPTS IN ORGANIZING AND POLICY EDUCATION: $20k → 14%Southeast Asian Community Alliance: $45k → 14%STRATEGIC CONCEPTS IN ORGANIZING AND POLICY EDUCATION: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $7.2M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$6.2M · 87% · 55 grants

Stated purpose: CLEAN ENERGY ADVOCACY

South Asia$394k · 5% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: CLEAN ENERGY ADVOCACY

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$320k · 4% · 11 grants

Stated purpose: BIOGEMS ADVOCACY

Sub-Saharan Africa$149k · 2% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: CLEAN ENERGY ADVOCACY

North America (Canada and Mexico)$95k · 1% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: BIOGEMS ADVOCACY · CLEAN ENERGY ADVOCACY

Russia and Neighboring States$7k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CLEAN ENERGY ADVOCACY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63M · 231 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

231 repeat relationships: 67 still active in FY2025, 164 since wound down; 46 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

231
301

Total granted

$63M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+18%

Still filing today

88%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $906k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NRDC ACTION FUND INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8.8M · revenue +82%
  • The Partnership Project Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.5M · revenue +35%
  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +490%

Funded once

  • PF
    PARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -58%
  • SP
    Solutions Project Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -54%
  • PP
    PEORIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT 150
    one grant, 2020 · $469k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
2
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
3
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
4
One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth connects thinkers, doers, activists, and knowledge holders from around the world to solve humanity's greatest ecological challenges--together. Our belief is simple: The solutions to the climate crisis already exist. By connecting…

Environment
5
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
6
Science & Environmental Health Network

In service to communities, the earth and future generations, the science and environmental health network forges science, ethics, and law into tools for action.

Environment
7
Advocates for Climate Innovation
Philanthropy
8
Environmental Law and Policy Center of the Midwest

The environmental law & policy center (elpc) is the midwest's leading public interest environmental legal advocacy and ecobusiness innovation organization, and among the nation's leaders. we develop and lead successful strategic…

Environment
9
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
10
Ceres Inc

Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

Environment
11
Environmental League of Massachusetts Inc

The organization's mission is to advocate for policy that meets the scale and urgency of our environmental challenges. as a massachusetts-based organization that engages in advocacy across a full spectrum of climate, environmental, and…

Environment
12
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sierra Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

529 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 529 of the 593 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

16
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
154
Early backer (in before they grew)
513/529
Grantees still filing
343/529
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Partnership Project Inc: $6,542,341 · EnvironmentThe Partnership Project IncSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $3,423,050 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SE…THE ROSE FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITIES THE ENVIRONMENT: $2,406,500 · EnvironmentTHE ROSE FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITIES THE EN…COMING CLEAN INC: $2,400,924 · EnvironmentCOMING CLEAN INCBlueGreen Alliance Foundation: $997,961 · EnvironmentElevate Energy: $908,491 · Environment+67 more: $9,313,168 · Environment+67 moreMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER: $11,926,250 · Community ImprovementMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CITY TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS INC: $2,727,496 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CI…+13 more: $1,498,474 · Community Improvement+13 moreNRDC ACTION FUND INC: $8,832,000 · OtherNRDC ACTION FUND INC+78 more: $11,939,371 · Other+78 moreBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA: $325,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $278,000 · EducationGREEN LIGHT NEW YORKINC DBA BUILDING ENERGY EXCHANGE (BEEX): $270,000 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE INC: $225,000 · EducationBlack Sustainability Inc: $200,000 · EducationFARM TRAINING COLLECTIVE NYC INC: $184,800 · EducationThe George Washington University: $126,000 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $113,870 · EducationThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $94,000 · EducationOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $90,000 · EducationNATIONAL CAUCUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATORS: $85,000 · Education+2 more: $118,950 · EducationLOW INCOME INVESTMENT FUND: $1,306,937 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL HOUSING TRUST: $150,800 · Housing & ShelterENERGY COORDINATING AGENCY OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterEcoWorks: $81,440 · Housing & ShelterESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterTIDES CENTER: $274,000 · Human ServicesHEAVENS VIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $166,667 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING FOR JUSTICE INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesLA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE: $144,500 · Human ServicesTri-County Urban League: $100,033 · Human ServicesBLACK AUTONOMY NETWORK COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $77,750 · Human ServicesNAEVA: $75,000 · Human ServicesCOLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $70,000 · Human ServicesStrategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education: $58,400 · Human ServicesFAIR DISTRICTS FUND: $324,000 · Civil RightsCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · Civil RightsNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $181,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $69,500 · Civil RightsAsian Pacific Amer InstitCongressional: $60,000 · Civil RightsMARCH ON MARYLAND: $60,000 · Civil Rights
Environment$25,992,435Community Improvement$16,152,220Other$20,771,371Education$2,110,620Housing & Shelter$1,699,177Human Services$1,116,350Civil Rights$894,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER: $11,926,250 over 4y, 20% of budgetNRDC ACTION FUND INC: $8,832,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetThe Partnership Project Inc: $6,542,341 over 9y, 9.2% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $3,423,050 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CITY TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS INC: $2,727,496 over 4y, 31% of budgetTHE ROSE FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITIES THE ENVIRONMENT: $2,406,500 over 2y, 40% of budgetCOMING CLEAN INC: $2,400,924 over 7y, 33% of budgetLOW INCOME INVESTMENT FUND: $1,306,937 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetBlueGreen Alliance Foundation: $997,961 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetElevate Energy: $908,491 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSTAND: $625,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY: $500,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSolutions Project Inc: $500,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $377,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA: $325,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFAIR DISTRICTS FUND: $324,000 over 4y, 71% of budgetNW ENERGY COALITION: $316,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR MARKET TRANSFORMATION: $294,167 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetSOUTHWEST ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECT: $292,500 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $283,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWest Harlem Environmental Action Inc: $280,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $278,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $274,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN LIGHT NEW YORKINC DBA BUILDING ENERGY EXCHANGE (BEEX): $270,000 over 7y, 9.5% of budgetWestern Resource Advocates: $266,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICA WORKS USA: $250,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEnvironmental Health Coalition: $230,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY: $227,800 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE INC: $225,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetCommunity Food Advocates Inc: $217,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetMETEC: $216,667 over 1y, 75% of budgetTAXPAYERS FOR COMMON SENSE: $210,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $209,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGreenLatinos: $203,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetAPPALACHIAN VOICES: $200,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAPPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN ADVOCATES INC: $200,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetBlack Sustainability Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY: $200,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetDogwood Alliance Inc: $197,242 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetINNOVATION CENTER FOR ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY: $190,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetCENTER FOR APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY: $185,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetFARM TRAINING COLLECTIVE NYC INC: $184,800 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetTEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY: $182,000 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $181,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetFRACK ACTION FUND INC: $180,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetUPPER MANHATTAN TOGETHER INC: $177,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetCENTER FOR SCIENCE IN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: $176,500 over 5y, 21% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NRDC ACTION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds The Partnership Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CITY TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROSE FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITIES THE ENVIRONMENT ↗
  • Who funds COMING CLEAN INC ↗
  • Who funds LOW INCOME INVESTMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds BlueGreen Alliance Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Elevate Energy ↗
  • Who funds STAND ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds Solutions Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds FAIR DISTRICTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENT NORTH CAROLINA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NW ENERGY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR MARKET TRANSFORMATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds West Harlem Environmental Action Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREEN LIGHT NEW YORKINC DBA BUILDING ENERGY EXCHANGE (BEEX) ↗
  • Who funds Western Resource Advocates ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA WORKS USA ↗
  • Who funds Environmental Health Coalition ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLES WATER BOARD COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Advocates Inc ↗
  • Who funds METEC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United States Energy …The Energy FoundationResources Legacy FundMovement Strategy Cen…Windward FundEnvironmental Defense…The Schmidt Family Fo…The Partnership Proje…PatagoniaorgSolutions Project IncSierra ClubEnergy Action Fund
United States Energy FoundationCA177.9× affinity152 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United States Energy Foundation · The Energy Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · Movement Strategy Center · Windward Fund · Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated · The Schmidt Family Foundation · The Partnership Project Inc · Patagoniaorg · Solutions Project Inc · Sierra Club · Energy Action Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Natural Resources Defense Council Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Coalition of Communities of Color: 15% of income from government
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Sea Research Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Orion Society Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Anthropocene Alliance: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 593 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Natural Resources Defense Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home