Skip to content

Florida · Private foundation

Natural Health Research Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$590k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
10
Organizations funded FY2023
30%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$360,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$360,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 15
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$2.6M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 30% of the organizations Natural Health Research Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 4% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$590k0%
FY202310$1.5M30%
FY20228$1.5M13%
FY202111$1.5M0%
FY202011$1.6M27%
FY201910$1.6M10%
FY201815$1.9M20%
FY201714$2.0Mn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$6.3MHealth$5.0MAnimals$532kFood & Nutrition$300kInternational$50kPhilanthropy$31kEducation$4kHuman Services$3kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
IA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
DC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Organic Consumers Association$5,590,130841%
National Vaccine Information Center$2,866,017739%
Consumers for Dental Choice Inc$1,899,030850%
Companion Animal Nutrition and Wellness Institute Inc$445,000767%
Caminos de Agua$260,000533%
Grassrootshealth$220,000234%
Pets Living Well Foundation Corporation$77,3472n/a
Food Democracy Now$60,0002n/a
Regeneration International$50,000125%
Health Research Institute$50,000111%
Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of Natural Health Research Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Organic Consumers Association$5,590,130841%
National Vaccine Information Center$2,866,017739%
Consumers for Dental Choice Inc$1,899,030850%
Companion Animal Nutrition and Wellness Institute Inc$445,000767%
Caminos de Agua$260,000533%
Grassrootshealth$220,000234%
Pets Living Well Foundation Corporation$77,3472n/a
Food Democracy Now$60,0002n/a
Regeneration International$50,000125%
Health Research Institute$50,000111%
Illinois Stewardship Alliance$9,80012%
Mrsa Survivors Network$7,0007n/a
Biodynamic Association Inc$5,00011%
Moms Across America$2,50011%
National Health Freedom Coalition$1,00011%

Plus 10 recipients with no EIN on record ($691k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Natural Health Research Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 7 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 12 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOrganic Consumers Association: $5,590,130 over 8y, 41% of budgetNational Vaccine Information Center: $2,866,017 over 7y, 39% of budgetConsumers for Dental Choice Inc: $1,899,030 over 8y, 50% of budgetCompanion Animal Nutrition and Wellness Institute Inc: $445,000 over 7y, 67% of budgetCaminos de Agua: $260,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetGrassrootshealth: $220,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetRegeneration International: $50,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetHealth Research Institute: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetIllinois Stewardship Alliance: $9,800 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBiodynamic Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMoms Across America: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNational Health Freedom Coalition: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rsf Social Finance IncCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rsf Social Finance Inc · Patagoniaorg · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Natural Health Research Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Natural Health Research Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Natural Health Research Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Natural Health Research Foundation

How much does Natural Health Research Foundation give?
Natural Health Research Foundation reported 2 grants totaling $590,030 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 15 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Natural Health Research Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (51%), Health (41%), Animals (4%).
Who are Natural Health Research Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Organic Consumers Association ($5.6M), National Vaccine Information Center ($2.9M), Consumers for Dental Choice Inc ($1.9M).
Does Natural Health Research Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 30% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Natural Health Research Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Natural Health Research Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Rsf Social Finance Inc, Patagoniaorg, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc.
Where is Natural Health Research Foundation based?
Natural Health Research Foundation is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Natural Health Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph