How much did NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN grant in FY2024?

NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN reported 19 grants totaling $900,475 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN based?

NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN is based in DC.

NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN

Mobilizes people of faith to end torture in u.s.

$900k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$75k

Largest

01What you fund

0164% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Crime & Legal$1.3MCivil Rights$678kHuman Services$270kReligion$240kHousing & Shelter$99kPhilanthropy$36kEducation$30kOther$1.5M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

reduce solitary

2019

reduce solitary

2020

reduce solitary

2021

reduce solitary

2022

against solitaryreform solitaryreformsprisonactivitiesprisons

2023

educationrightsreformsactivitiesstop solitaryadvocacynorth

2024

abolishrightsactivitiesreform solitarynorthstop solitary

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k9 grants · $343k
$50k–250k10 grants · $557k

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$6.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

INTERFAITH ACTION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS$75,000
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$65,000
ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER$59,000
DC JUSTICE LAB$55,000
OPENDOORS$53,000
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST MASSACHUSETTS ACTION NETWORK INC$50,000
SALVATION AND SOCIAL JUSTICE$50,000
JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER OF LA$50,000
DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA$50,000
CHICAGO LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS$50,000
ACLU OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION$49,974
CITIZENS FOR PRISON REFORM$47,000
ACLU OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION INC$40,900
WLM MINISTRIES$40,000
RETURN STRONG$40,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.0M · 23 repeat orgs$209k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.0M

$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%

+316%

Still filing today

91%

80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Crime & LegalCivil RightsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterReligionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AO
ACLU OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $310k · revenue +60%
AL
ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER
7× · 2018–2024 · $302k · revenue +484%
JA
JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER OF LA
6× · 2019–2024 · $260k · revenue +16%

Funded once

MP
MAINE PRISONER ADVOCACY COALITIONgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +316%
SOCIAL GOOD FUNDgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +388%
VO
VOICE OF THE EXPERIENCEDgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +299%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights

At a historic meeting at the White House in 1963, President John F. Kennedy, Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, and Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy challenged 244 of America's most prominent attorneys to spearhead the cause for equal…

—

American Civil Liberties Union

At the aclu of south carolina, we envision a south carolina where "we the people" means all of us. we defend and advance the civil rights and civil liberties of all south carolinians through lobbying and political engagement.

—

Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights

American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Louisiana

At the aclu of louisiana, we seek to protect the civil rights and liberties of all louisiana by working to dismantle systems of opression that harm the most vulnerable members of the community specifically, black, brown, immigrant, and…

Civil Rights

American Civil Liberties Union of

The american civil liberties union of kentucky (aclu) is freedom'swatchdog, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities todefend the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people bythe constitutions of the united…

—

American Civil Liberties Union of

Preservation and promotion of civil rights and civil liberties.

—

Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal

American Civil Liberties Union

The organization monitors legislation that could impact civil liberties and takes the necessary action to support or oppose such legislation.

—

American Civil Liberties Union -

Provide assistance to those denied their civil liberties

Civil Rights

American Civil Liberties Union

The aclu foundation of oregon is dedicated to preserving and defending civil liberties and civil rights.

Civil Rights

American Civil Liberties Union

To champion individual rights under a charter granted by the ACLU (National Affiliate).

—

Equal Justice Under Law

To provide legal assistance to people living in poverty in order to promote social welfare.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Abolitionist Law Center and the most unlike its peers is Southern Center for Human Rights. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/31

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

28/28

Grantees still filing

21/28

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,531,774Crime & Legal$1,349,906Civil Rights$678,495Human Services$269,894Religion$240,000Housing & Shelter$98,667Philanthropy$36,000Education$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Equal Justice WorksDC22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Equal Justice Works · New Venture Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Borealis Philanthropy · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Solidago Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CITIZENS FOR PRISON REFORM.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 455617939 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CITIZENS FOR PRISON REFORM, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 64% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to National Religious Campaign?

Find your warmest path to National Religious Campaign through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Religious Campaign?

More from the funding graph

NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Religious Campaign?

More from the funding graph