Loading…
· Public charity
NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE
Build power, take action and create change to win complete equality and achieve justice for lgbtq people and their families.
$544k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants
2
Communities
$291k
Largest
01What you fund
0171% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Philanthropy$900kCivil Rights$109kHuman Services$10kYouth Development$10kOther$426k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
educate participatingparticipating census
2021
legalparents doctorschildren bornborn intersexintersex conditionsconditions dsd'smiami
2023
miami
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $50k–250k1 grant · $216k
- $250k+1 grant · $291k
$291,097
Median grant
2
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
- NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ACTION FUND INC$291,097
- THE MIAMI FOUNDATION$216,033
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 97% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 3 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
11
Total granted
$1.3M
$180k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+33%
+115%
Still filing today
100%
91%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Civil RightsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE MIAMI FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2023 · $900k · revenue +13%- NLNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ACTION FUND INC3× · 2021–2023 · $356k · revenue +33% · 91% of their budget
- IINTERACT2× · 2020–2021 · $19k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- MAMOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +139%
- SFSAVE FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +134%
- PPFLAGgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Equality Nc
Securing equality and justice for lgbtq north carolinians.
Civil Rights
2
National Lgbtq Task Force
Build power, take action and create change to win complete equality and achieve justice for lgbtq people and their families.
—
3
Transgender Law Center
Transgender Law Center TLC changes law, policy and attitudes so that all people can live safely, authentically, and free from discrimination regardless of their gender identity or expression.
Civil Rights
4
Eqtx Equality Texas dba Equality Texas
Equality Texas works to secure full equality for LGBTQ+ Texans.
—
5
Funders for Lesbian and Gay Issues Inc
Funders for lgbtq issues educates and organizes funders and supports power-building to create an abundance of resources for the justice and liberation of all queer communities.
Civil Rights
6
Equality Utah
The organization pursues educational, lobbying, and political activites in otder to further lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (lgtb)interests within utah.
Civil Rights
7
Equality Florida Action Inc
Securing full equality and justice for florida's lgbtq community.
Civil Rights
8
Advocates for Trans Equality Education
Advocates for trans equality fights for the legal and political rights of transgender people in america. leveraging decades of experience on the frontlines of power, we shift government and society towards a future where we are no less…
Civil Rights
9
Equality Federation
Movement builder and strategic partner to state-based organizations advocating for lgbtq+ people.
Civil Rights
10
Glaad Inc
As the world's largest lgbtq media advocacy organization, glaad ensures fair, accurate, and inclusive representation that leads to 100% acceptance.
—
11
Equality Federation Institute
Movement builder and strategic partner to state-based organizations advocating for lgbtq+ people.
Civil Rights
12
Eqtx Equality Texas Foundation
To secure equality for LGBTQ+ Texans through education, community organizing, and collaboration.
Civil Rights
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equality Florida Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Interact Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Philanthropy$900,033Other$426,097Civil Rights$109,000Human Services$10,000Youth Development$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ACTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SAVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PFLAG ↗
- Who funds TRANGENDER LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL QUEER ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds INTERACT ↗
- Who funds CENTERLINK ↗
- Who funds TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NM ↗
- Who funds PRIDELINES YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY NORTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Tides FoundationCA19.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Our Fund Foundation Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Arcus Foundation · Gill Foundation · The Pride Foundation · Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Tides Center · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Centerlink Inc — 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ACTION FUND INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 132772832 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ACTION FUND INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 91% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to National Lgbtq Task Force?
Find your warmest path to National Lgbtq Task Force through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines