Skip to content

· Public charity

National Council for Air and Stream Improvement Inc

To provide technical information and scientific research to the forest products industry needed to achieve environmental goals and principles.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$7.7MEducation$1.0MScience & Tech$559kFood & Nutrition$151kAnimals$121kRecreation & Sports$101kCommunity Improvement$80kHealth$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 27 grants below total $1,966,822, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,398,264 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $431,442 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $472k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $977k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$35,509
Median grant
14
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATURESERVE$500,000
NCASI FOUNDATION$235,000
HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION$194,888
BILL - UGS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$155,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$119,231
FORESTECH INTERNATIONAL LLC$111,871
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY$106,000
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$55,047
THE ORIANNE SOCIETY$46,000
KENNEDYJENKS CONSULTANTS$45,000
ANDREW J KROLL (ROCINANTE CONSULTING LLC)$39,800
WEST FORK ENVIRONMENTAL$38,454
CREEKWALKER AQUATICS$36,800
US FOREST SERVICE$35,509
THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AWARD TITLE$32,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION: $195k → 18%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $80k → 16%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $231k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $147k → 15%NCASI FOUNDATION: $330k → 8%NCASI FOUNDATION: $102k → 11%FORESTECH INTERNATIONAL LLC: $123k → 6%BILL - UGS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $155k → 24%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $178k → 27%ANTHESIS LLC: $59k → 12%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $70k → 24%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $72k → 21%LAKIND ASSOCIATES LLC: $80k → 11%HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION: $76k → 18%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $112k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $59k → 15%NCASI FOUNDATION: $235k → 8%FORESTECH INTERNATIONAL LLC: $118k → 6%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $141k → 27%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $61k → 24%NATURESERVE: $500k → 7%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $70k → 21%NCASI FOUNDATION: $130k → 8%FORESTECH INTERNATIONAL LLC: $112k → 6%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $132k → 27%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $60k → 24%NATURESERVE: $200k → 7%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $267k → 18%NCASI FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%FORESTECH INTERNATIONAL LLC: $112k → 6%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $126k → 27%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $60k → 24%NATURESERVE: $158k → 7%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $192k → 18%NCASI FOUNDATION: $80k → 8%FORESTECH INTERNATIONAL LLC: $109k → 6%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $120k → 27%NATURESERVE: $130k → 7%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $150k → 18%FORESTECH INTERNATIONAL LLC: $96k → 6%UGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $111k → 27%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $120k → 21%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $139k → 18%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $65k → 8%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $106k → 21%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $119k → 18%VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY: $83k → 21%AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $67k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 24% of National Council for Air and Stream Improvement Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

National Council for Air and Stream Improvement Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 29% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.5M · 34 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
34

Total granted

$8.5M
$953k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+15%

Still filing today

29%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $334k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationAnimalsScience & TechEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NatureServe
    5× · 2019–2025 · $998k · revenue +8%
  • UO
    University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $876k · revenue +80%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $875k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • FI
    FORESTECH INTERNATIONAL LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $112k
  • ES
    ENERCON SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $84k
  • OS
    OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $81k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
5
American Ornithological Society

See schedule othe american ornithological society (aos) is an international membership organization that connects ornithologists, science, and bird conservation by supporting science that advances the understanding and conservation of…

Science & Tech
6
United States Endowment for Forestry

The endowment works collaboratively with partners in the public and private sectors to advance systemic, transformative, and sustainable change for the health and vitality of the nation's working forests and forest reliant communities.

Environment
7
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
8
Natural State Ltd

Through large-scale restoration and rewilding, NATURAL STATE secures biodiversity, sequesters and stores carbon, and helps achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.NATURAL STATE is helping restore and rewild a minimum of 1,000,000 acres.

Environment
9
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
12
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agricultural Research Foundation; the most unlike its peers is University Education Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,020,267 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC: $874,500 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INCVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $613,400 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITYFORESTECH INTERNATIONAL LLC: $612,851 · OtherFORESTECH INTERNATIONAL LLCMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $433,873 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $393,441 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITYAGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE (USDA): $302,821 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $275,425 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $240,000 · Other+57 more: $2,341,761 · Other+57 moreUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $875,884 · EducationUniversity of G…CAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION: $295,286 · EducationCAL POLY HUMBOL…BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $104,848 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSI…University of Maine Foundation: $54,000 · EducationNatureServe: $998,000 · EnvironmentNatureServe+2 more: $63,956 · Environment+2 moreNCASI FOUNDATION: $131,579 · AnimalsTHE ORIANNE SOCIETY: $46,000 · AnimalsGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATIONINC: $155,000 · Science & TechUNIVERSITY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · Employment
Other$7,108,339Education$1,330,018Environment$1,061,956Animals$177,579Science & Tech$155,000Employment$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNatureServe: $998,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $875,884 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC: $874,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION: $295,286 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATIONINC: $155,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNCASI FOUNDATION: $131,579 over 2y, 61% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $104,848 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAgricultural Research Foundation: $83,676 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUniversity of Maine Foundation: $54,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ORIANNE SOCIETY: $46,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetOUR CLIMATE COMMON: $35,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetUNIVERSITY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE: $28,956 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NatureServe ↗
  • Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds CAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds NCASI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Agricultural Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Maine Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE ORIANNE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON FOREST PROTECTION ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Chemical SocietyDC19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Chemical Society · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Howard Hughes Medical Institute · President and Fellows of Harvard College · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Council for Air and Stream Improvement Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Council for Air and Stream Improvement Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Conservation Biology Institute: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Council for Air and Stream Improvement’s filings →

More from the funding graph