Skip to content
National Committee for Furtherance of Jewish Education and Affilliates at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Committee for Furtherance of Jewish Education and Affilliates

Jewish education

$869k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$338k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$1.6M
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $537,715, the rows itemized in this filing. The $868,739 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $331,024 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $181k
  • $250k+1 grant · $338k
$13,780
Median grant
4
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD DUTCHESS$338,440
MEKOR CHAYIM INC$37,469
CONG CHABAD OF ULSTER COUNTY$26,604
GEMACH EZRAS YEHUDA$21,000
CONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM$20,000
CHABAD OF BROOKLYN HEIGHTS$16,000
MAIMONIDES HEBREW DAY SCHOOL$13,780
CONGREGATION CHASDEI ZVI$13,000
CHABAD OF PARKLAND$12,000
OHOLEI TORAH$11,172
RABBINICAL COLLEGE$10,250
HEBREW ACADEMY COMMUNITY SCHOOL$6,000
CHABAD OF GREATER DAYTON$6,000
MENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CHABAD DUTCHESS: $338k → 9%OHR TIMIMIM: $9k → 13%MAIMONIDES HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $19k → 14%NCFJE OF ROCKLAND: $13k → 14%CONG CHABAD OF ULSTER COUNTY: $27k → 16%RCBB CHABAD OF PARK SLOPE: $35k → 20%RABBINICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 4%CHABAD OF HOFSTRA: $9k → 6%CHABAD DUTCHESS: $338k → 9%MAIMONIDES HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $19k → 14%MESIFTA LUBAVITCH OF MONSE: $15k → 14%CHABAD OF ULSTER COUNTY: $22k → 16%GEMACH EZRAS YEHUDA: $21k → 20%CHABAD OF PEMBROKE PINES: $9k → 13%CHABAD DUTCHESS: $44k → 9%MAIMONIDES HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $18k → 14%MESIFTA LUBAVITCH OF MONSE: $14k → 14%CONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM: $20k → 16%GAN ACADEMY YESHIVA: $16k → 20%CHABAD DUTCHESS: $35k → 9%MAIMONIDES HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $15k → 14%MESIFTA LUBAVITCH OF MONSE: $11k → 14%CHABAD OF ULSTER COUNTY: $14k → 16%CHABAD OF WASHINGON HEIGHTS: $9k → 17%OHOLEI TORAH: $11k → 20%CHABAD DUTCHESS: $30k → 9%MAIMONIDES HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $14k → 14%CONG CHABAD OF ULSTER COUNTY: $10k → 16%FRIENDS OF CHABAD TZFAS INC: $10k → 20%CHABAD OF PARKLAND: $12k → 13%CHABAD DUTCHESS: $11k → 9%MAIMONIDES HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 14%YESHIVAH TOMCHI TEMIM LUBAVITC: $8k → 20%MEKOR CHAYIM INC: $37k → 13%CHABAD DUCHESS: $9k → 9%OHOLEI TORAH: $8k → 20%CAMP GAN ISRAEL: $7k → 20%CONGREGATION CHASDEI ZVI: $13k → 20%KOLLEL ZICHRON MENACHEM: $10k → 20%CHABAD OF BROOKLYN HEIGHTS: $29k → 20%CHABAD OF BROOKLYN HEIGHTS: $16k → 20%CHABAD OF BROOKLYN HEIGHTS: $13k → 20%CHABAD OF BROOKLYN HEIGHTS: $13k → 20%CONGREGATION KOSOVO: $17k → 20%HAIGUD: $31k → 20%HAIGUD: $18k → 20%BAIS RIVKA: $9k → 20%BAIS RIVKA: $8k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 17 repeat orgs$239k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
22

Total granted

$1.4M
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+3%

Still filing today

18%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    Maimonides Hebrew Day School
    6× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +85%
  • AB
    ASSOCIATED BETH RIVKA SCHOOL FOR GIRLS
    3× · 2020–2024 · $28k · revenue +37%
  • RC
    RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA
    3× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHABAD OF WINDSOR TERRACE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $35k
  • CK
    CONGREGATION KOZOVER ZICHRON CHAIM SHLOIME
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
  • GA
    Gan Academygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
2
Maimonides Hebrew Day School

Providing a religious and secular education to students

Education
3
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
4
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
5
Chinuch Yahudi

Jewish traditions and heritage enlightment, vocational education

Religion
6
University of Judaism Foundation
—
7
Tamim Academies
Philanthropy
8
Cheder Chabad - Philadelphia

Cheder Chabad - Philadelphia educates boys and girls from nursery through 8th grade with a dual curriculum in Jewish and General Studies

Education
9
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
10
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
11
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
12
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cheder Yaldei Menachem Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Kahan Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD DUTCHESS: $808,090 · OtherCHABAD DUTCHESSMaimonides Hebrew Day School: $94,934 · OtherMaimonides Hebrew Day SchoolCOLEL CHABAD: $77,025 · Other+33 more: $564,425 · Other+33 moreRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA: $15,870 · EducationGan Academy: $15,500 · EducationJEWISH HERITAGE DAY SCHOOL OF BUFFALO: $8,600 · EducationMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · EducationFriends of Chabad Tzfas Inc: $10,120 · InternationalTHE KAHAN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $6,500 · PhilanthropyCANDID: $2,000 · PhilanthropyCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $1,200 · PhilanthropyCHEDER YALDEI MENACHEM INC: $1,200 · ReligionAHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC: $180 · Religion
Other$1,544,474Education$45,970International$10,120Philanthropy$9,700Religion$1,380

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMaimonides Hebrew Day School: $94,934 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetASSOCIATED BETH RIVKA SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $28,289 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA: $15,870 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGan Academy: $15,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFriends of Chabad Tzfas Inc: $10,120 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE DAY SCHOOL OF BUFFALO: $8,600 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCAMP GAN ISRAEL INC: $7,100 over 2y, 71% of budgetTHE KAHAN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCANDID: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHEDER YALDEI MENACHEM INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAHAVAS CHESED - LOVE OF KINDNESS INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Maimonides Hebrew Day School ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED BETH RIVKA SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Gan Academy ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Chabad Tzfas Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE DAY SCHOOL OF BUFFALO ↗
  • Who funds CAMP GAN ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KAHAN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CANDID ↗
  • Who funds CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundCongregation Bh IncUnited Jewish Communi…Nash Charity Foundati…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Maimon and Ruth Kirsc…Saul Schottenstein Fo…Bracha Vehatzlacha Fo…Lets Make It Happen N…The Rapoport Family F…The Rav-Noy Family Fo…
The Ojc FundNY22.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Congregation Bh Inc · United Jewish Community of Broward County Inc · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Maimon and Ruth Kirschenbaum Foundation Inc · Saul Schottenstein Foundation C · Bracha Vehatzlacha Foundation Inc · Lets Make It Happen Ny Inc · The Rapoport Family Foundation Inc · The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Committee for Furtherance of Jewish Education and Affilliates funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Committee for Furtherance of Jewish Education and Affilliates. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Rabbinical College of America: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to National Committee for Furtherance of Jewish Education and Affilliates?

Find your warmest path to National Committee for Furtherance of Jewish Education and Affilliates through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Committee for Furtherance of Jewish Education and Affilliates’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home