· Private foundation
Congregation Bh Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YESHIVA GEDOLAH RABBINICAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC | $20,435 |
| YB CHESED FUND INC | $9,376 |
| SOUTHERN CT HEBREW ACADEMY | $6,000 |
| CHABAD OF SEDONA | $1,800 |
| CHABAD OF MID-HUDSON VALLEY - MIKVAH MA'AYAN CHAYA | $1,000 |
| CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF LONGMONT | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YGYeshiva Gedolah Rabbinical Institute of New England Inc6× · 2019–2024 · $71k · revenue +93%
- YCYB CHESED FUND INC6× · 2019–2024 · $64k · revenue +44%
- YSYaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization4× · 2019–2022 · $5k · revenue +103%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $7k
- JEJEWISH EDUCATIONAL MOVEMENTone grant, 2021 · $3k
- TATHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INCone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide children with an outstanding Jewish and Secular education.
Religious School
To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.
Jewish educational programs
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
Provide college level education and extensive background of jewish law and talmudic studies and rabbinical ordination.
to provide quality education to the local community
Operation of a religious elementary school with aproximately 50 children enrolled
The Organization operates an religious outreach center to promote and understand Judaism and the laws of Kosher.
To provide financial support to the yeshiva knesseth yisroel institution, its rabbis, and students, and lend support to other religious institutions in israel and around the world, with the goal of furthering jewish values among the jewish…
To provide religious Jewish education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chaim Medical Resource Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nicolinas Wishes Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Yeshiva Gedolah Rabbinical Institute of New England Inc ↗
- Who funds YB CHESED FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Yaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization ↗
- Who funds CAMP GAN ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP GAN ISRAEL OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Lets Make It Happen Ny Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Saul Schottenstein Foundation C · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Lavie Shterna Popack Family Foundat · National Committee for Furtherance of Jewish Education and Affilliates · Maon Noam Inc · Crain-Maling Foundation · Erlbaum Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Congregation Bh Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Aleph Institute Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Congregation Bh Inc?
Find your warmest path to Congregation Bh Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.