Skip to content
National Coalition on Black Ci Participation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

National Coalition on Black Ci Participation

The National Coalition serves as an effective convener, coalition builder and facilitator at the local, state and national levels.

$865k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
8
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2020.

Civil Rights$783kPublic Benefit$195kHuman Services$148kEducation$70kCommunity Improvement$30k
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $800k
$80,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$404k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GCPA$150,000
GEORGIA STAND UP$140,000
FCBCP$125,000
CLAYTON COUNTY$125,000
ACBCP$80,000
Individual grant recipient$65,000
Individual grant recipient$65,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
DREAM WORKS INC$35,000
CHARITY FOUNDATI$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $148k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Allen Place Comm: $25k → 10%Mothers of Hope: $20k → 12%GA Coalition: $103k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
OH
PA
MD
SC
DC
MS
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alliance for a Better Georgia Inc

To increase voting and civic engagement in the State of Georgia.

—
2
Southern Black Policy & Advocacy Network

The mission of the Southern Black Policy and Advocacy Network is to improve health outcomes and to reduce social and economic disparities impacting Black communities living in the U.S. South.

—
3
Community Movement Builders Inc

Community Movement Builders CMB is a member based collective of black people dedicated to being a force for creating sustainable self-determining communities through cooperative economic advancement and collective community organizing. Our…

Public Benefit
4
National Coalition on Black Civic Partic

The National Coalition serves as an effective convener, coalition builder and facilitator at the local, state and national levels. We work collaboratively to address the disenfranchisement of underserved communities through institution…

Public Benefit
5
Georgia Greater Black Chamber of Commerce

Empowering and sustaining African American communities through entrepreneurship and capitalistic activity within the United States

Human Services
6
Georgia for All Inc

Providing education of the public on local and national issues, in order to combat misinformation, through targeted digital marketing, based on data, and community engagement.

—
7
Peoples Advocacy Institute

Peoples Advocacy Institute (PAI) is a non-profit community resource, training and capacity building incubator for transformation justice in the South.

Arts & Culture
8
Network for Developing Conscious Communities Inc

NDCC works collaboratively with partners to conduct and contract with others to conduct general organizational training activities including engaging in conferences and membership solicitation to educate, organize and distribute leadership…

Housing & Shelter
9
Metro Decatur Black Chamber of Commerce

Improve business conditions for minorty businesses

Community Improvement
10
Core Community Coalition

The core community coalition seeks to elevate the quality of life for minority and needy citizens through shared advocacy, collaborative leadership, education, and access to opportunities. the coalition shall provide resources and advocacy…

Human Services
11
Detroit Unity Fund

Aggressively concentrating on giving Black Americans a fundamental base that will help electrify them to vote through our community organizing, voter registration drives, canvassing voters and mobilization.

Community Improvement
12
Liberation Policy Action Cente

Community education, public events, development of aspirational policy agenda, increasing civic engagement on issues impacting children and youth.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Strategic Alliance for New; the most unlike its peers is Hbcu Green Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GCPA: $150,000 · OtherGCPAGEORGIA STAND UP: $140,000 · OtherGEORGIA STAND UPCLAYTON COUNTY: $125,000 · OtherCLAYTON COUNTYFCBCP: $125,000 · OtherFCBCPACBCP: $80,000 · OtherACBCPIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDREAM WORKS INC: $35,000 · Other+2 more: $40,000 · OtherGeorgia Coalition for the People's Agenda: $103,000 · Human ServicesGeorgia Coali…ALLEN PLACE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesALLEN PLACE C…MOTHERS OF HOPE: $20,000 · Human ServicesMOTHERS OF HO…Florida Coalition On Black Civic Participation Inc: $50,000 · Public BenefitOne Voice: $20,000 · Public BenefitHBCU GREEN FUND INC: $45,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $22,000 · Civil RightsMOTHERING JUSTICE: $15,500 · Civil RightsCharity Foundation: $30,000 · Community ImprovementGeorgia Strategic Alliance for New: $20,000 · Employment
Other$875,000Human Services$148,000Public Benefit$70,000Education$45,000Civil Rights$37,500Community Improvement$30,000Employment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGeorgia Coalition for the People's Agenda: $103,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetHBCU GREEN FUND INC: $45,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetALLEN PLACE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetGeorgia Strategic Alliance for New: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMOTHERING JUSTICE: $15,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hopewell FundBvm Capacity Building…Amalgamated Charitabl…Windward FundNEO Philanthropy IncThe Community Foundat…The Ford FoundationTides FoundationNational Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …
Hopewell FundDC17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hopewell Fund · Bvm Capacity Building Institute Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Windward Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Ford Foundation · Tides Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Coalition on Black Ci Participation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Coalition on Black Ci Participation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Coalition on Black Ci Participation’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home