· Public charity
National Coalition on Black Ci Participation
The National Coalition serves as an effective convener, coalition builder and facilitator at the local, state and national levels.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of National Coalition on Black Civic Partic’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $800k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GCPA | $150,000 |
| GEORGIA STAND UP | $140,000 |
| FCBCP | $125,000 |
| CLAYTON COUNTY | $125,000 |
| ACBCP | $80,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $65,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $65,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| DREAM WORKS INC | $35,000 |
| CHARITY FOUNDATI | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $148k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To increase voting and civic engagement in the State of Georgia.
The mission of the Southern Black Policy and Advocacy Network is to improve health outcomes and to reduce social and economic disparities impacting Black communities living in the U.S. South.
Community Movement Builders CMB is a member based collective of black people dedicated to being a force for creating sustainable self-determining communities through cooperative economic advancement and collective community organizing. Our…
The National Coalition serves as an effective convener, coalition builder and facilitator at the local, state and national levels. We work collaboratively to address the disenfranchisement of underserved communities through institution…
Empowering and sustaining African American communities through entrepreneurship and capitalistic activity within the United States
Providing education of the public on local and national issues, in order to combat misinformation, through targeted digital marketing, based on data, and community engagement.
NDCC works collaboratively with partners to conduct and contract with others to conduct general organizational training activities including engaging in conferences and membership solicitation to educate, organize and distribute leadership…
The core community coalition seeks to elevate the quality of life for minority and needy citizens through shared advocacy, collaborative leadership, education, and access to opportunities. the coalition shall provide resources and advocacy…
Ambitious Initiatives is radically improving educational outcomes for underrepresented populations and building a new generation of leaders.
Aggressively concentrating on giving Black Americans a fundamental base that will help electrify them to vote through our community organizing, voter registration drives, canvassing voters and mobilization.
By empowering individuals with the education, training and support they need to fine and keep family- sustain employment, build a brighter future for the city by investing in our most valuable resource; our people
Community education, public events, development of aspirational policy agenda, increasing civic engagement on issues impacting children and youth.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Strategic Alliance for New and the most unlike its peers is Hbcu Green Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda ↗
- Who funds Florida Coalition On Black Civic Participation Inc ↗
- Who funds HBCU GREEN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Charity Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALLEN PLACE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
- Who funds Georgia Strategic Alliance for New ↗
- Who funds One Voice ↗
- Who funds MOTHERS OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds MOTHERING JUSTICE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hopewell Fund · Bvm Capacity Building Institute Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Windward Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Ford Foundation · Tides Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Coalition on Black Ci Participation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.