Skip to content

· Public charity

National Charity League Inc Newport Chapter

To foster mother-daughter relationships in a philanthropic organization committed to community service, leadership development and cultural experiences.

$311k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$577kHuman Services$408kInternational$362kEducation$355kYouth Development$128kFood & Nutrition$95kHousing & Shelter$66kReligion$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $298,696, the rows itemized in this filing. The $311,251 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,555 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $162k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $113k
$16,780
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAKE A WISH$60,000
SCHOLARSHIPS$53,472
HI HOPES HEAD INJURY PROGRAM$33,000
CALIFORNIA HANDS AND VOICES$30,000
HUMAN OPTIONS$24,248
THOMAS HOUSE FAMILY SHELTER$19,366
SOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN$16,780
ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION$13,719
GIRLS INC$13,162
PROJECT HOPE ALLIANCE$11,940
Individual grant recipient$8,551
ROBYNES NEST$8,275
SHARE OUR SELVES$6,183
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $222k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CALIFORNIA HANDS AND VOICES: $30k → 11%SHARE OUR SELVES: $11k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES: $6k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $48k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $27k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $25k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $24k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $24k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $15k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $11k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 15 repeat orgs$260k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$1.8M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+71%

Still filing today

53%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND
    6× · 2017–2024 · $362k · revenue ×14
  • Human Options Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $176k · revenue +33%
  • TH
    THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $76k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • BB
    BACK BAY THERAPEUTIC RIDING CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $70k · revenue +71% · 25% of their budget
  • CC
    CHOC Childrens Hospital Found
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colette's Children's Home Inc

Colettes childrens home provides housing and supportive services to homeless women and children with nowhere to turn. we work to remove the barriers that cause displacement and provide the means for transition from homelessness to stable…

Housing & Shelter
2
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
3
Human Services Network Dba Youth Services Network Inc

Our missions is to restore youth to lives of purpose, meaning and opportunity. human services network, dba youth services network (ysn), was founded in 1985. ysn operates three (3) community-based homes that serve boys from throughout los…

Health
4
Human Services Association

The principal mission of Human Services Association is to provide families with compassionate and comprehensive care to promote wellness and build strong communities.

Human Services
5
Housing Choices Coalition for Persons With Developmental Disabilities Inc

To enhance the lives of people with developmental and other disabilities by creating quality, affordable housing options.

Housing & Shelter
6
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
7
Hope Horizon Mental Health formerly Tulare Youth Service Bureau

The Organizations mission is to provide children and families compassionate, culturally sensitive mental health services that nurture hope, strengths, and healthy relationships at home, school and in the community.

Education
8
Habitat for Humanity of Orange County Inc

Habitat for humanity's mission is to give witness to the christian gospel by working with god's people to build decent habitats for those who are inadequately sheltered in orange county.

—
9
Children's Home of Stockton Inc

CHS guides youth and young adults forward to hope and resiliency.

—
10
Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor

The mission of Laurel House (dba Hope Harbor) is providing a home for teens in crisis, transforming lives, and strengthening families. Laurel House has the only long-term youth shelters in Orange County, CA for runaway, homeless and…

—
11
Hack the Hood Inc

Hack the Hood provides youth and communities of color with tech skill-building programs and career navigation support that are grounded in justice and ensure economic mobility.

Arts & Culture
12
Fair Housing Foundation

The fair housing foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to the elimination of discrimination in housing and promoting equal access to housing choices for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Someone Cares Soup Kitchen; the most unlike its peers is Back Bay Therapeutic Riding Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HI HOPES HEAD INJURY: $453,500 · OtherHI HOPES HEAD INJURYScholarships Incorporated: $328,229 · OtherScholarships IncorporatedSOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN: $85,133 · OtherSOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHENTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER: $76,385 · OtherTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTERH & G STEELE CHLD FDN: $74,500 · OtherH & G STEELE CHLD FDNMAKE A WISH: $60,000 · Other+12 more: $166,762 · Other+12 morePALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $361,680 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S…Human Options Inc: $175,567 · Human ServicesHuman Option…California Hands & Voices: $30,000 · Human ServicesCalifornia H…Share Our Selves Corporation: $16,888 · Human ServicesShare Our Se…Project Hope Alliance: $46,653 · EducationTHINK TOGETHER: $26,450 · EducationBACK BAY THERAPEUTIC RIDING CLUB INC: $70,000 · HealthORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $36,855 · Crime & LegalROBYNES NEST: $8,275 · Youth Development
Other$1,244,509International$361,680Human Services$222,455Education$73,103Health$70,000Crime & Legal$36,855Youth Development$8,275

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $361,680 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetScholarships Incorporated: $328,229 over 9y, 36% of budgetHuman Options Inc: $175,567 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetSOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN: $85,133 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER: $76,385 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetBACK BAY THERAPEUTIC RIDING CLUB INC: $70,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetProject Hope Alliance: $46,653 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $36,855 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCalifornia Hands & Voices: $30,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHINK TOGETHER: $26,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShare Our Selves Corporation: $16,888 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROBYNES NEST: $8,275 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds Scholarships Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Human Options Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOMEONE CARES SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds BACK BAY THERAPEUTIC RIDING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Hope Alliance ↗
  • Who funds ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds California Hands & Voices ↗
  • Who funds THINK TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds Share Our Selves Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ROBYNES NEST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Croul Family Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Frome Family Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · O L Halsell Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Sempra Foundation · California Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Charity League Inc Newport Chapter funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Charity League Inc Newport Chapter. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Charity League Inc Newport Chapter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph