Skip to content

· Private foundation

National Center to Encourage Judaism

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$426k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$927kPhilanthropy$287kFood & Nutrition$148kCivil Rights$91kHuman Services$51kEducation$25kSocial Science$21kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $297k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$5,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$62,900
VARIOUS SYNAGOGUES$45,248
SUTTON PLACE SYNAGOGUE NYC$36,200
Individual grant recipient$30,000
INSTITUTE FOR SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE$30,000
Individual grant recipient$28,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
MISHKAN CHICAGO$25,000
KENESETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION$16,800
Individual grant recipient$16,000
FINCHLEY PROGRESSIVE SYNAGOGUE$13,000
AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HEBREW COLLEGE$6,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SID JACOBSON JCC: $3k → 6%LIMMUD BOSTON: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of National Center to Encourage Judaism’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

National Center to Encourage Judaismlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 48 repeat orgs$443k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
59

Total granted

$1.8M
$296k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+20%

Still filing today

19%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $147k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PK
    Project Kesher
    5× · 2019–2023 · $41k · revenue +193%
  • AA
    ALEPH Alliance for Jewish Renewal
    3× · 2022–2024 · $24k · revenue +44%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • FJ
    FEDERATION JEWISH MENS CLUBS
    one grant, 2017 · $47k
  • JD
    JDC(JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMM)
    one grant, 2018 · $42k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
J Leaders

Our vision is to develop ethical, impactful Jewish young adult leaders to ensure a vibrant Jewish community and make the world a better place. Our mission is to empower and engage Jewish young adults through leadership development and…

Youth Development
3
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Jewish Center for Justice

Founded in 2017, the Jewish Center for Justice (JCJ) is a distinguished social justice, education, and leadership development platform that meets each individual where they are in their journey to inspire change. JCJ's mission is to…

Human Services
5
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

KU Hillel's mission is to connect Jewish students to each other and to their Judaism, to inspire and equip the next generation of Jewish leaders, and to build a thriving Jewish community on campus.

—
6
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
7
Hillel Foundation at Miami University

Hillel at Miami University, the center of Jewish life on campus, seeks to engage, connect, and empower students to explore their Jewish identity creating a vibrant Jewish community and inspiring the next generation of Jewish leaders.

—
8
The University of Iowa Louis Shulman Hillel Foundation

The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…

—
9
Ccf New York Jewish French Community Center of Ny Inc

To further French Jewish Culture, help integration of American in France and French in USA concerning Jewish Culture

Religion
10
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
11
Liumi Inc

Liumi offers spiritual guidance,inspiration and education around jewish life,including joyful shabbat and holiday celebrations, life cycle events and more

Religion
12
American University Hillel Inc

To enrich the lives of Jewish students so that they may enrich the Jewish people and the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judaism Your Way; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Discovery Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $376,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVARIOUS SYNAGOGUES: $244,047 · OtherVARIOUS SYNAGOGUESIndividual grant recipient: $204,175 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEW FED NORTH AMER: $132,250 · OtherJEW FED NORTH AMER+111 more: $1,084,010 · Other+111 moreVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $210,000 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD C…Jewish Federation Of Greater Buffalo Inc: $12,400 · Philanthropy+2 more: $10,800 · PhilanthropyINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE: $105,000 · Arts & CultureALEPH Alliance for Jewish Renewal: $23,600 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $15,454 · ReligionSOCIETY FOR HUMANISTIC JUDAISM: $12,100 · ReligionJEWISH LEARNING VENTURE: $10,000 · ReligionJUDAISM YOUR WAY: $6,000 · ReligionINTERFAITHFAMILYCOM INC: $3,000 · ReligionAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · EducationHEBREW COLLEGE: $6,200 · EducationMakom Community: $2,700 · EducationSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,800 · Human ServicesLIMMUDBOSTON INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesKULANU INC: $1,500 · International
Other$2,041,382Philanthropy$233,200Arts & Culture$105,000Religion$70,154Education$20,900Human Services$4,300International$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $210,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE: $105,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetProject Kesher: $40,868 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetALEPH Alliance for Jewish Renewal: $23,600 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $15,454 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Federation Of Greater Buffalo Inc: $12,400 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIETY FOR HUMANISTIC JUDAISM: $12,100 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH LEARNING VENTURE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHEBREW COLLEGE: $6,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUDAISM YOUR WAY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCharleston Jewish Federation Inc: $5,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEMPHIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Alliance Southern Maine: $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOLKSHULN OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $4,100 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetINTERFAITHFAMILYCOM INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMakom Community: $2,700 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $1,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHILLEL AT VA TECH INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKULANU INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLIMMUDBOSTON INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Project Kesher ↗
  • Who funds ALEPH Alliance for Jewish Renewal ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation Of Greater Buffalo Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR HUMANISTIC JUDAISM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LEARNING VENTURE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Covenant FoundationNY17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Covenant Foundation · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Upstart Bay Area · Lasko Family Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Center to Encourage Judaism funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Center to Encourage Judaism. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Center to Encourage Judaism’s filings →

    More from the funding graph