Skip to content
National Alliance for Care at Home Leadership Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Alliance for Care at Home Leadership Foundation Inc

The foundation leads efforts to ensure that individuals living with serious illness-and their families-have equitable access to high quality, interdisciplinary, person centered hospice and palliative care.

$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$650kHuman Services$20k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE FOR CARE AT THE END OF LIFE$150,000
WESLEY AT HOME LLC$20,000
HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE CREDENTIALING CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $290k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE: $35k → 12%TEXAS & NEW MEXICO HOSPICE ORG: $35k → 10%ILLINOIS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE: $35k → 14%ALLIANCE FOR CARE AT THE END OF LIFE: $150k → 9%LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI HOSPICE: $35k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
NV
OH
PA
CA
UT
VA
NC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Non-Profit Hospice Alliance

The Texas Nonprofit Hospice Alliance (TNPHA) is a group of nonprofit hospices dedicated to sharing best practices and providing quality care for individuals with life-limiting illnesses.

Human Services
2
Home Care Hospice & Palliative Care Alliance of New Hampshire

The alliance educates, connects, and advocates for health care organizations to advance the delivery of high quality care.

—
3
The Hospice and Palliative Care Network of Maryland Inc

To promote hospice and palliative care in all settings and advocate for quality end of life care.

—
4
National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care Inc

The national coalition for hospice and palliative care works to improve the care of people with serious or life-limiting illnesses by convening the field, advocating for equitable policies and improved health outcomes, establishing best…

Health
5
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
6
Hospice and Palliative Care Federation of Massachusetts Inc

To advance and promote excellence in end of life care by: advocating for its members, patients, families and the end-of-life care giving community; providing education and enhancing awareness and fostering innovation in end-of-life…

—
7
New Mexico Association for Home and

The organization serves its membership through advocacy, networking, education, and communication by promoting success and best practices for home care, hospice, and related home health support services.

—
8
Missouri Hospice and Palliative

A statewide organization dedicated to supporting and strengthening coordinated care for terminally ill missourians and their families through the advancement of hospice and palliative care.

—
9
Indiana Hospice & Palliative Care Organization Inc

The mission of the organization is to meet the needs of indiana residents choosing hospice services through education, exchange of information, development of hospice programs, and promotion of accepted standards for hospice practices.

—
10
American Health Care Association

Improving lives by delivering solutions for quality care.

—
11
National Hospice Work Group Inc

To influence the future of hospice and advanced illness care through innovation and collaboration.

Human Services
12
Hospice and Home Care of Alexander County Inc

Patient care and family support to the terminally ill.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice & Palliative Care Assn of New York State Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pennsylvania Hospice Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Georgia Hospice and Palliative Care Organization: $35,000 · OtherGeorgia Hospice and Palliative Care OrganizationINFINITY HOSPICE CARE: $35,000 · OtherINFINITY HOSPICE CARECARE SOLUTIONS NETWORK OF OHIO: $35,000 · OtherCARE SOLUTIONS NETWORK OF OHIOHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE ASSN OF NEW YORK STATE INC: $35,000 · OtherHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE ASSN OF NEW YORK STATE INCASSOCIATION FOR HOME & HOSPICE CARE OF NORTH CAROLINA: $35,000 · OtherASSOCIATION FOR HOME & HOSPICE CARE OF NORTH CAROLIN…SOUTH CAROLINA HOME CARE & HOSPICE ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA HOME CARE & HOSPICE ASSOCIATIONOHIO COUNCIL FOR HOME CARE & HOSPICE: $35,000 · OtherOHIO COUNCIL FOR HOME CARE & HOSPICEMAINE HOSPICE COUNCIL & CENTER FOR END-OF-LIFE CARE: $35,000 · OtherMAINE HOSPICE COUNCIL & CENTER FOR END-OF-LIFE CAREWESLEY AT HOME LLC: $20,000 · OtherWESLEY AT HOME LLC+1 more: $10,000 · OtherTHE ALLIANCE FOR CARE AT THE END OF LIFE: $150,000 · Human ServicesTHE ALLIANCE FOR CARE AT THE END OF LIFETexas Hospice Organization Inc: $35,000 · Human ServicesTexas Hospice Organization IncIllinois Hospice & Palliative Care: $35,000 · Human ServicesIllinois Hospice & Palliative CarePENNSYLVANIA HOSPICE NETWORK INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANIA HOSPICE NETWORK INCLOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE ORGANIZATION INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesLOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE…CALIFORNIA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA …Homecare & Hospice Assoc of Utah: $35,000 · HealthHomecare & …
Other$310,000Human Services$290,000Health$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR CARE AT THE END OF LIFE: $150,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetTexas Hospice Organization Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetGeorgia Hospice and Palliative Care Organization: $35,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCALIFORNIA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetHomecare & Hospice Assoc of Utah: $35,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetIllinois Hospice & Palliative Care: $35,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE ASSN OF NEW YORK STATE INC: $35,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HOSPICE NETWORK INC: $35,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR HOME & HOSPICE CARE OF NORTH CAROLINA: $35,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA HOME CARE & HOSPICE ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetOHIO COUNCIL FOR HOME CARE & HOSPICE: $35,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetMAINE HOSPICE COUNCIL & CENTER FOR END-OF-LIFE CARE: $35,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetLOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE ORGANIZATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetHOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CREDENTIALING CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Alliance for Care at Home Leadership Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Alliance for Care at Home Leadership Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Alliance for Care at Home Leadership’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home