Skip to content
Nathan and Lillian Weinberg Family Found at a glance

· Public charity

Nathan and Lillian Weinberg Family Found

See schedule othe foundation was created to carry out the charitable, educational, and religious purposes of the associated jewish community federation of baltimore, inc.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$323kReligion$115kInternational$113kHousing & Shelter$68kYouth Development$38kPublic Benefit$25kFood & Nutrition$20kEnvironment$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $95,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $123,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE$35,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$20,000
HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH ARAB EDUCATION IN IS$10,000
ABRAHAMIC HOUSE$10,000
PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL$10,000
ADAMAH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOCIAL GOOD FUND: $10k → 9%ABRAHAMIC HOUSE: $10k → 14%NEW ISRAEL FUND: $10k → 17%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%ABRAHAMIC HOUSE: $10k → 6%PEARLSTONE RETREAT CENTER: $30k → 11%THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $35k → 19%ABRAHAMIC HOUSE: $10k → 14%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10k → 17%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%ABRAHAMIC HOUSE: $10k → 6%PEARLSTONE RETREAT CENTER: $20k → 11%CHAI: $30k → 19%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $8k → 17%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 14%ABRAHAMIC HOUSE: $10k → 6%PEARLSTONE RETREAT CENTER: $15k → 11%CHAI: $15k → 19%SLINGSHOT FUND INC: $10k → 17%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%ADAMAH: $10k → 11%CHAI: $15k → 19%ADAMAH: $8k → 11%CHAI: $8k → 19%THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $95k → 19%THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $65k → 19%THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $55k → 19%THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE: $53k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$625k · 8 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against -51% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$625k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-51%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyReligionHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ADAMAH INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $83k · revenue +159%
  • CH
    COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING ASSISTANCE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $68k · revenue +30%
  • AH
    ABRAHAMIC HOUSE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • SLINGSHOT FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abrahamic Reunion Inc

The abrahamic reunion works to build sustainable peace with diverse faith communities in the holy land. we foster harmony by exploring common abrahamic values in order to create deep and lasting connections between people.

International
2
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
3
The Jerusalem Connection
—
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
6
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
7
Better Future for Israel

To strengthen israel's future in these areas: 1)providing new immigrants with assistance in a few key areas: representing them as they navigate government ministries and assisting them with their challenges as new immigrants to israel.…

Philanthropy
8
University of Judaism Foundation
—
9
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
10
International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc

The international fellowship of christian and jews is the leading non-profit building bridges between christians and jews, blessing israel and the jewish people around the world with, humanitarian care and life-saving aid.

—
11
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Hillel's mission is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

Religion
12
The Honey Foundation for Israel
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc; the most unlike its peers is Abrahamic House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC: $302,500 · PhilanthropyTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTI…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $17,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyADAMAH INC: $82,500 · ReligionADAMAH INCABRAHAMIC HOUSE: $50,000 · ReligionABRAHAMIC HOUSENEW ISRAEL FUND: $65,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $40,000 · InternationalHAND IN HAND AME…COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING ASSISTANCE INC: $67,500 · Housing & ShelterCOMPREHENS…PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $37,500 · Youth DevelopmentWESTERN STATES CENTER: $25,000 · Public BenefitMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $20,000 · OtherSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $10,000 · Education
Philanthropy$330,000Religion$132,500International$105,000Housing & Shelter$67,500Youth Development$37,500Public Benefit$25,000Other$20,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC: $302,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetADAMAH INC: $82,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE HOUSING ASSISTANCE INC: $67,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetABRAHAMIC HOUSE: $50,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $37,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWESTERN STATES CENTER: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLINGSHOT FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Harry and Jeanett…Jewish Community Fede…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation IncMD13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nathan and Lillian Weinberg Family Found funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nathan and Lillian Weinberg Family Found. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Comprehensive Housing Assistance Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Adamah Inc: 10% of income from government
  • The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nathan and Lillian Weinberg Family Found?

Find your warmest path to Nathan and Lillian Weinberg Family Found through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nathan and Lillian Weinberg Family Found’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home