Skip to content

· Private foundation

Natan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$2.3MReligion$1.4MEducation$341kScience & Tech$200kCivil Rights$160kHuman Services$123kHealth$110kFood & Nutrition$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $290k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$65,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO$750,000
JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL NORTH AMERICA$250,000
THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE$150,000
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$75,000
THE GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION$65,000
JEWISH COLORADO$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO$10,000
CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL$5,000
AMERICA GIVES$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $80k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
CA
UT
CO
AZ
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 37% of Natan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Natan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 32% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 11 repeat orgs$373k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +2% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$3.1M
$366k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
0%

Still filing today

64%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalPhilanthropyEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $225k · revenue +2%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO
    5× · 2020–2024 · $120k · revenue +174%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • AF
    ASSOCIATION FOR WALDORF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2020 · $136k
  • AF
    Association for Waldorf Education in San Diego
    one grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue 0%
  • CD
    CHILDREN'S DENTAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2020 · $80k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
3
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
4
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
5
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
6
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
7
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
8
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
9
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
10
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Genesis Jerusalem Inc

Support for schools in israel conducting post high school programs in various courses of jewish studies, touring and volunteer work all in israel

International
12
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Israel Education Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Turning Point Home of San Diego. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO: $1,370,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGOJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL NORTH AMERICA: $745,400 · OtherJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL NORTH AMERICAIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASSOCIATION FOR WALDORF EDUCATION: $135,505 · OtherASSOCIATION FOR WALDORF EDUCATION+8 more: $128,500 · OtherJEWISHColorado: $1,085,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISHColoradoAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $65,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET I…+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $350,000 · InternationalTHE SHALOM HARTMAN…AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL ED…AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $200,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY F…Association for Waldorf Education in San Diego: $125,000 · EducationGRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION: $75,000 · EducationJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $120,000 · Human ServicesTHE TURNING POINT HOME OF SAN DIEGO: $30,000 · Health
Other$2,529,405Philanthropy$1,152,000International$775,000Education$200,000Human Services$120,000Health$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISHColorado: $1,085,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $350,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAssociation for Waldorf Education in San Diego: $125,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $120,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION: $75,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $65,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TURNING POINT HOME OF SAN DIEGO: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
  • Who funds THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds Association for Waldorf Education in San Diego ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TURNING POINT HOME OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Natan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Natan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Natan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph